• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

William Shatner Confirms Talks for Star Trek Return at 93 Years Old

It's an interesting concept but seeing the Burn era in Discovery didn't interest me. I also think taking Kirk out of any interaction with the 24th/25th Century is not a good bet. It feels like Andromeda.
 
I don’t say this often, but this sounds truly bad.
I don’t know, to my mind it sounds kind of fun. And since it’s not Shatner writing this time, there’s no reason to assume it’ll be “Kirk comes in and effortlessly owns the future because he’s such a big damn god” like The Return and its sequels became (fun though they were). Picard did lay the seed, so why not play with it?
 
So they've cloned Kirk and moved him forward in the timelime, giving him the ISS Enterprise from Disco. I toyed with the clone idea for decades, was never satisfied with it.
 
So they've cloned Kirk and moved him forward in the timelime, giving him the ISS Enterprise from Disco. I toyed with the clone idea for decades, was never satisfied with it.
that's the ISS? Good catch! Home(ish)

I know they said 'no other characters' (granted, pretty much everyone is long dead or not born yet!) but what about the EMH (unless that is allowed after they establish his status quo in Starfleet Academy, which tbh is the one thing hooking me to that show! Mind you Frakes has said 'it's for the die-hards')
 
So they've cloned Kirk and moved him forward in the timelime, giving him the ISS Enterprise from Disco. I toyed with the clone idea for decades, was never satisfied with it.
I think you're right! (From startrekcomics.info)

For seven centuries, the United Federation of Planets brought together the entire Galaxy with peace, stability, enlightenment, and the promise of mutual protection. And then, in one terrible moment, it all crumbled in an event known as THE BURN, a Galaxy-wide disaster in which dilithium has gone inert, causing the detonation of every active warp core. The only ship remaining is a hack-and-slash Enterprise-Omega and its ragtag crew. Facing a true Wild West in space, the crew will need to make use of what few resources they have to uphold Starfleet's mission of unity across the universe... and Captain Kirk will have to face a future without the Federation he loved so dearly...
 
Actually, the Burn is in the 31st century, 120 years before Disco's arrival in the 32nd, so even if we're measuring from Kirk's time, that 800 years. But that plot description specifically calls the Federation itself 7 centuries, which unless you're measuring from the 24th century is not accurate from any perspective.

That's what's happening here isn't it? The writers consider the 24th century the real beginning of Star Trek?
 
I think you're right! (From startrekcomics.info)

For seven centuries, the United Federation of Planets brought together the entire Galaxy with peace, stability, enlightenment, and the promise of mutual protection. And then, in one terrible moment, it all crumbled in an event known as THE BURN, a Galaxy-wide disaster in which dilithium has gone inert, causing the detonation of every active warp core. The only ship remaining is a hack-and-slash Enterprise-Omega and its ragtag crew. Facing a true Wild West in space, the crew will need to make use of what few resources they have to uphold Starfleet's mission of unity across the universe... and Captain Kirk will have to face a future without the Federation he loved so dearly...
That description just sounds like they're trying to make Discovery's third season, just with Kirk instead of Michael Burnham.

I'll pass.
 
All you’re talking about is buzz and ratings. I’ve yet to hear anything substantive about a story that justifies a 94-year-old actor reprising a role he hasn’t played on screen in 31 years.
Jeez. More time has passed since his final on-screen appearance as Kirk than his entire run from Where No Man Has Gone Before to ST: Generations.

I don’t need to see a 90+ year old Shatner playing himself rather than playing his character. Because at this point, that’s what we’d get.
This.
 
I just realised something. I kind of wanted this for real!!? haha

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

the Bring Back Kirk Trailer was the closest I guess
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top