Looks more like Doohan than Pegg and he's actually a Scot.And Wow, that is a TERRIBLE looking Scotty.
Looks more like Doohan than Pegg and he's actually a Scot.And Wow, that is a TERRIBLE looking Scotty.
And...you knowHeh ... Scotty probably ages faster from now to TOS because he's constantly worrying about his beautiful bairns.
![]()
Don't I know it....And...you know![]()
Exactly so. This one series is the spiritual successor of the original.Funny, the longer this goes, the more blatantly sure it becomes that this is absolutely the prime/TOS timeline. It feels like TOS. It feels Fun! It can be light hearted one episode, and deeply serious and thought provoking the next. It makes me feel..... young.
Martin Quinn IS great.
I read this a lot and no, that's a load of tribble droppings. Y'all may wanna revisit it. This is not like the original series, even on Gene Coon's most unchaperoned weeks in charge. They had a handful of lighter episodes and a couple of all out comedies and a generous helping of weirdness, but they didn't pull the crew into this sort of thing on a regular and hype it as the main draw.Feels like The Original Series to me. They had all sorts of crazy shenanigans.
when was a date given in Season 2?Centenary could be the word behind her. But that would mean a timeskip as both seasons are set in 2259.
Why wouldn't he be? He's a reoccurring character.I don't know why Kirk is still in it
Looks more like an homage than a parody.Even if its for their parody episode.
Absolutely. Despite the claims of some, nothing is being contradicted or overwritten. Context is being added, that's all.By whose standard, because other than the look being updated for the modern era, the stories feel very much like TOS and the character arcs are being wonderfully fleshed out by my standard.
I just feel like he shouldn't. The show is supposed to be about Pike and his adventures. I just feel having Kirk takes away from that.Why wouldn't he be? He's a reoccurring character.
Seems to working out okay. He pops up for two or three episodes. They've all been good episodes.I just feel like he shouldn't. The show is supposed to be about Pike and his adventures. I just feel having Kirk takes away from that.
I do, frequently. TOS is my favourite series. Has been for almost 40 years.Y'all may wanna revisit it.
Sure it is.This is not like the original series
Well, no. TOS was very much the Kirk, Spock and McCoy show, while SNW is much more an ensemble. That said, the trio were certainly put through some pretty unique situations.but they didn't pull the crew into this sort of thing on a regular
Thanks, I will.If you like this kinda Star Trek, great, enjoy it.
Sure it was. I'll give you that SNW is certainly more condensed, but that's just a reality of modern TV.But the original series was rarely self consciously over the top and campy.
It always seems to come back the musical. I don't understand it. At its core, it was a pretty standard anomaly of the week episode. Not any more hard to believe than a dozens of previous episodes from older series.but show me the musical episode of TOS,
Sure they were. They were part of the fun of TOS. As mentioned my others, that was one of the things that made Trek great. It's ability to pivot from episode to episode."A Piece of the Action" and "Shore Leave" were never Star Trek's main selling points or greatest strengths.
Yes it did. It also continues to be great.SNW started out with great promise
I think I'll pass on further adventures of this version of the Enterprise.
The "previous Trek had bad stuff too" argument never made sense. Do people really want more Spock's Brain, Children Shall Lead, Shore Leave, Way to Eden? (If Wishes Were Horses, Storyteller, The Fight also come to mind)I read this a lot and no, that's a load of tribble droppings. Y'all may wanna revisit it. This is not like the original series, even on Gene Coon's most unchaperoned weeks in charge. They had a handful of lighter episodes and a couple of all out comedies and a generous helping of weirdness, but they didn't pull the crew into this sort of thing on a regular and hype it as the main draw.
If you like this kinda Star Trek, great, enjoy it. But the original series was rarely self consciously over the top and campy. The passage of time and evolving styles made it that way to some people, but show me the musical episode of TOS, or the one where they look like the came out of an old movie.
"A Piece of the Action" and "Shore Leave" were never Star Trek's main selling points or greatest strengths.
SNW started out with great promise, but this is becoming more like a Doctor Who type show, with it's tongue firmly lodged in its cheek, wrapped up in its own cleverness. No thank you, I think I'll pass on further adventures of this version of the Enterprise.
Well, there's "The Way to Eden" and "A Piece of the Action"/"Patterns of Force"/"Bread and Circuses". And there certainly were big musical numbers in the middle of "Charlie X" and "The Conscience of the King."show me the musical episode of TOS, or the one where they look like the came out of an old movie.
IIRC Rigel mission in 2254 was referred to as 5 years ago. The Klingon war that ended in 2257 was said to be 2 years ago. And Im sure Uhura mentions that everything thats happened to her on the Enterprise was all "this year"when was a date given in Season 2?
Season 1 AFAIK is the only one to give a date.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.