• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"Good Episodes" you think are bad?

The Inner Light is an episode that I have soured on over time. Picard was mind-raped and didn't even get an apology.

It's a big happy coincidence but, aside from that Kamen's life was pretty good, Picard really doesn't seem like the kind who would at all mind living decades to experience/learn about, help in some sense preserve another, lost culture, rather he would consider it at least very worthwhile.

DS9's "Hard Time" is basically "The Inner Light" but what if we showed you how horrible it could be.

O'Brien didn't get an apology either.

I've long thought "Far Beyond the Stars" feels a lot like doing another "The Inner Light" (both are real good) and at the end Sisko was very grateful for the experience or at least the lessons it gave.

I really don't get love for "The Wire", it was OK but just reveled in its ambiguity and I didn't think that was real enjoyable or rewarding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JLA
The Empath from TOS is bad to me. The gratuitous torture just makes me turn away. I honestly don't think I've rewatched it in this century.
 
I've seen people who like "Threshold" and dislike "The Visitor". Shows that there really is no accounting for taste.

I'm one of those.

That is to say, I don't dislike The Visitor, but I do think it's overrated. I'd call it merely good but not great. In order for me to rate it great it would need to have more substance than it does, and focus a bit less on the emotions.

Similar for Threshold, I don't deny that in terms of logical consistency and presentation of science concepts it's bad. But I still think it has some redeeming characteristics, even though the episode is plainly ridiculous.
 
So the episode is bad because no other episode ever followed up on it? How is that the fault of the original episode?
It's obviously not. COTEOF is the single greatest hour of Trek ever produced, bar none.

If all the rest of Star Trek magically vanished and was forgotten, this story would still work. You could drop it into the original Twilght Zone and it would make every damn Top Ten list on the Internet.*

*Faint praise, but you get it.
 
VOY’s “One Small Step” — the idea’s fine, but the dialogue’s hokey, especially trembling-voiced Seven telling the astronaut’s corpse who won the ballgame he missed.
 
The Empath from TOS is bad to me. The gratuitous torture just makes me turn away. I honestly don't think I've rewatched it in this century.

Ditto. Gratuitous and with a reason so thin and superficial, it isn't believable.

Data’s Day is a boring, corny non-event of an episode that it seems like a lot of folks like. It’s an immediate “skip” for me.

Ditto. Data would still have reported the Vulcan ambassador to the Captain regardless, and Captain would have made a more educated guess. I'm amazed Data didn't realize the ambassador was a spy at that one moment. This is on par with "Justice" from season 1 where Riker and Yar are written to be out of character for the sake of the plot. Humor is subjective, but as much as seeing the Romulans score a point otherwise being an interesting change of pace, it felt surprisingly shallow too.

I'm one of those.

That is to say, I don't dislike The Visitor, but I do think it's overrated. I'd call it merely good but not great. In order for me to rate it great it would need to have more substance than it does, and focus a bit less on the emotions.

Similar for Threshold, I don't deny that in terms of logical consistency and presentation of science concepts it's bad. But I still think it has some redeeming characteristics, even though the episode is plainly ridiculous.

Same here. "Visitor" works great on initial viewing, but doesn't hold up because it's doing more to tweak the emotions than to tell a deeper story. In rewatches, the plot foibles really start to stand out. Best to watch it every few years, when some of the initial awe-striking moments feel awe-striking again, and in considering that the 24th century has everyone so accustomed to goofy things in space that when a complete old guy stranger says he's seeing his younger father because of a temporal distortion and how he has to kill himself for the timeline to be restored or whatever, the citizens of that era don't call for ambulance to get the person to the inpatient hospital for suicide watch due to delusional thinking (the DSM-V-TR is loaded with lots of things, but what might the DSM-XXIV-R might tell, change their minds on, et cetera? Could modern day viewers even handle a science fiction theory and changes mannerisms?)

"Threshold" is a bit silly with the treknobabble that does wean one off of it, but to be fair nobody really knows what would happen if an organic being inside a spaceship breached the barrier, didn't have their atoms scattered across everywhere and what not as a result, and it'd arguably be sillier if Paris and Janeway mutated into apes because sci-fi was already doing that "what humans will become" trope way too often before the 1990s. Which apparently is no big deal since Doctor "I'm a hologram not a McCoy ripoff" EMH there can easily fix everyone, so transwarp 'em all home and dollop the antidote on 'em before they all fall to pieces and go communicate with Geoge and Gracie's great-great-great-great-great-orso grandcalves, since the whaling flick had its own share of issues too (with warping away while in the atmosphere being the dumbest as the velocity would strip all that pesky air away and all, but most in the audience hooted and hollered with glee so it must all be good.)
 
An episode I revile, but most people seem to think is middle of the road at worst, is "Half a Life". Something about a global genocide bring regarded in even a semi-sympathetic light really didn't sit well with me.
 
When your society decides everyone will die at a certain age maximum, does it give people a greater sense of mortality and purpose than we have, (because we live at most twice that long - 120 instead of 60, or at least (barring tragedy) 70-100) or not?
 
When your society decides everyone will die at a certain age maximum, does it give people a greater sense of mortality and purpose than we have, (because we live at most twice that long - 120 instead of 60, or at least (barring tragedy) 70-100) or not?
Whatever the motivation, I don't really care. I can understand a person who is old and infirm and suffering choosing to end their life, whether by swallowing a pill or the quicker expedient of a gunshot to the head. But mandating the death of healthy, productive people because of a number is just wrong.

My head canon to this day is that without Timcin, his people were unable to restore their sun, making them the instruments of their own demise.
 
My head canon to this day is that without Timcin, his people were unable to restore their sun, making them the instruments of their own demise.
A not entirely improbable scenario.

The episode explores two things:
1. A solution to overpopulation that manages to be rigorously fair, and to avoid offending the sensibilities of those who categorically oppose any interference with fecundity, while remaining a fundamentally bad one (much like Vonnegut's "Welcome to the Monkey House"), and
2. Mandatory retirement, taken to the ultimate extreme.
 
When your society decides everyone will die at a certain age maximum, does it give people a greater sense of mortality and purpose than we have, (because we live at most twice that long - 120 instead of 60, or at least (barring tragedy) 70-100) or not?
No.
 
It's probably proportional to them - every half year of their lives has the same level of importance and productivity as one of ours, or lack of same. So at 30, they have their mid-life crisis.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top