Well, it was quite a mixed bag. I liked it, but it had its fair share of issues.
Kurtzman intentionally killed Legacy?
- Thread starter Beyerstein
- Start date
Well, I liked her in Prodigy. If she never came back as Janeway ever again, she's at least got that.
Or perhaps they simply don't want to have two series running at the same time that both take place onboard an Enterprise.
DING DING DING DING DING!!!
I've been saying ever since the finale of S3 dropped, if they had simply kept that hero ship named the Titan, or even just rename it USS Picard, that might have given LEGACY a slightly better chance at being greenlit.
Matalas said that he set up that end with the idea of it being the Next Next Generation. I really disagree with that take. One of the nice things about TNG was that its main cast were entirely new characters. Aside from a cameo by Bones, the show kicked off with characters that had ZERO ties to the original series. They were literally their own crew and the show had to stand by that, and it's something I wish we would get with a future series one day.
LEGACY would feature Seven, Raffi, and that annoying son who I can't remember the name of. That's not baggage I want for what could be the next TNG. IMO, the next TNG should be set furthest into the timeline. Set it in 3451 for all I care, so long as all the characters are brand new with no ties.
So.. Star Fleet Academy... currently in production and set to Premiere in 2026
So.. Star Fleet Academy... currently in production and set to Premiere in 2026
SFA features The Doctor (Voyager) and several Disco people.
And it's not really a traditional Trek show in the way TOS, TNG, and SNW are. It's a Trek series with its own unique premise just as DS9, Picard, Lower Decks, and Prodigy were. It'll do its thing while SNW serves as the flagship series for the foreseeable future.
Don’t forget the completely boring LaForge daughters!
Wow, had totally forgotten about them already. And even now I can remember the conn officer but not the other!
Clearly leading Star material then.
Yeah, how interesting was Geordi after 10 episodes of TNG? They played a minor part and did fine in that role.
Geordi got interesting?
What I saw of him he did a lot of technobabble spouting and didn't do well with women.
Their only interesting characteristic was being Geordi's kids.
They didn't really develop his character until TNG season seven when we saw his mother. Figured the PIC writers just continued the tradition.
Sidney and Alandra serve their story purpose, limited though it is. They're not really there to be fully-fleshed out characters. They're there to give Geordi personal stakes.
Where did I say that? You said they were under-developed while I think they were developed to the point necessary for the story being told.So now we're just supposed to toss them over the side?
On "The Orville" it's the butt of a joke that the CO and XO are an ex-couple.
But this is what Star Trek fans seem to like...
Oh Alex Kurtzman, thank thee for letting this cup pass from us.
Is there a compelling reason to keep them? TOS turned over two casts.So now we're just supposed to toss them over the side?
Oh Alex Kurtzman, thank thee for letting this cup pass from ye.
Similar threads
