welcome to 2005.
Yes I know..........
welcome to 2005.
After my hospital stay over blood clots early August, I’d be lucky to have 8 bits…
In the article, it says you only use the full 10-bits when you're doing heavily intensive mental processing.After my hospital stay over blood clots early August, I’d be lucky to have 8 bits…
If your mind is idling, you most likely won't be using that many "levels of processing" or "bits of processing."Caltech-based scientists Prof. Markus Meister and Graduate Student Jieyu Zheng wrote the paper, highlighting the disparity between outer brain and inner brain data throughput. They question why the inner brain, where you think about the deluge of data we experience, works so slowly despite being home to approximately a third of the brain's 85 billion neurons.
The researchers say they used an information-centric approach to measuring human thinking speed, applying a wide range of techniques based on information theory. In addition to conducting their own experiments, the Caltech boffins measured human performance in tasks such as reading and writing, playing video games, and solving Rubik's Cubes to come up with their headline 10 bits per second assessment.
"This is an extremely low number," Meister admitted of the result. "Every moment, we are extracting just 10 bits from the trillion that our senses are taking in and using those 10 to perceive the world around us and make decisions. This raises a paradox: What is the brain doing to filter all of this information?" It also remains a mystery why most humans can only think about one thing at a time despite our senses being highly parallel.
So, the research paper seems to have sparked a lot of questions, but Meister and Zheng already have some ideas about the leisurely pace of human thought. "Our ancestors have chosen an ecological niche where the world is slow enough to make survival possible," Zheng and Meister wrote in the research paper. "In fact, the 10 bits per second are needed only in worst-case situations, and most of the time our environment changes at a much more leisurely pace."
There are also some implications here about technologies such as Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs). The researchers ponder, for example, if neural interfaces will be hamstrung at the same effective 10 bits per second. Perhaps this research will lead to a faster way to connect the inner and outer brain processes, making better use of those billions of neurons.
They’ve sold around four hundred thousand, including this 1TB model which has transported me to the virtual shore of a photogrammetric simulation of Trillium Lake with Mount Hood in the distance—replete with ambient audio from the integrated audiopods or my AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C)—as a virtual text input box floats above and follows my Magic Keyboard with Touch ID (USB-C) which is intelligently filtered into the virtual environment along with my hands and arms.Looks like Apple might be in the process of halting production of its Apple Vision Pro as they don't seem to be able to sell them.
They’ve sold around four hundred thousand, including this 1TB model which has transported me to the virtual shore of a photogrammetric simulation of Trillium Lake with Mount Hood in the distance—replete with ambient audio from the integrated audiopods or my AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C)—as a virtual text input box floats above and follows my Magic Keyboard with Touch ID (USB-C) which is intelligently filtered into the virtual environment along with my hands and arms.
Watching movies and videos on a giant 3D OLED screen is incredible and arraying windows and 3D models in physical space is extraordinarily futuristic. Photos can be converted to 3D within a few seconds, and third-party software can convert any video into 3D, either in realtime or through prerendering if you want a better result. Immersive 3D videos are even more impressive and are surely the future of cinema. You can also shoot your own immersive videos and photos. OTOY and The Roddenberry Archive have some impressive content developed exclusively for the Vision Pro. The virtual keyboard is terrible, which is why I bought a physical one, but the eye- and handtracking are incredible.
I bought this Vision Pro (US$3,900) with the official case ($200) and battery clip ($50) plus two years of AppleCare+ ($500) barely used on Swappa for $2,578 and the AirPods Pro 2 ($250 through Apple or $189 through Amazon) new for $154 on Black Friday (along with an extra pair so that I don’t have to wait for one pair to charge), paying full price only for the Magic Keyboard ($150) and Magic Trackpad ($130). I may also add an M4 Mac Mini (starting at $600, or $500 with a .edu email) since it fits in the Vision Pro case and enables the impressive Mac Ultrawide Display. iPhones and iPads can also be mirrored to the Vision Pro.
As Tim Cook said, this is technology of the future made available today.
They’ve sold around four hundred thousand
Development is still fully underway on the next versions (a new Pro model and a cheaper alternative). People are confusing the possible early discontinuation of this model with the cancellation of the Vision line altogether, which is certainly not happening.There are plenty of examples throughout history of revolutionary hardware that never caught on for whatever reason. This is just the latest.
Development is still fully underway on the next versions (a new Pro model and a cheaper alternative). People are confusing the possible early discontinuation of this model with the cancellation of the Vision line altogether, which is certainly not happening.
Lesson learned today. Do not burn disks at higher speeds just to shave some time off.. Drop the speed and you get a much better result.
Seems to work perfectly nearly all the time.
Hard drives are cheaper.
A new Pro version has reportedly been delayed but will inevitably appear eventually as technology improves. There's no chance of Apple permanently abandoning extended reality. Before that, a refresh of the existing model with an M5 chip and Apple Intelligence may appear late this year or next along with a $2,000 version with reduced features.Even if they were to hypothetically continue with a new Pro version and a new lower-end version, it seems highly optimistic to me that they would go through with it given how the first one sold.
They remind me of the TV mini series V.They looked quite goofy
What about the look, to me they just looked very goofy. Surely they could have made them look a bit more attractive.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.