david is dead…this is not the nexus, it's reality, you can see a glimpse of kirk's body having been reanimates as picard season 3.
1. Is this canon?
2. A friend of mine says the young grey-haired Vulcan is Saavik's and Spock's son - does he have a name?
3. Is the number a stardate? Comes back as 15 November 3088.
1. No.1. Is this canon?
2. A friend of mine says the young grey-haired Vulcan is Saavik's and Spock's son - does he have a name?
3. Is the number a stardate? Comes back as 15 November 3088.
This is the best de-aging CGI I have ever seen. I looked for artifacts and other anomalies, but the appearances of everyone and their facial expressions were top notch. I hope that if all Star Trek shows get remastered down the line, such tech can be used to fix all sorts of issues, actor replacements and continuity errors.
That doesn't make sense...to me it's obviously Kirk's essence travelling towards "heaven" but before he can completely cross over, he enters Spock's final resting place (probably from between Star Trek: Into Darkness and Star Trek Beyond) and both of their consciousnesses meet again before they go on together...david is dead…this is not the nexus, it's reality, you can see a glimpse of kirk's body having been reanimates as picard season 3.
That doesn't make sense...to me it's obviously Kirk's essence travelling towards "heaven" but before he can completely cross over, he enters Spock's final resting place (probably from between Star Trek: Into Darkness and Star Trek Beyond) and both of their consciousnesses meet again before they go on together...
Like if this is a regenerated Kirk (I had to go research Picard season 3 since I stopped watching all the shows after Picard season 1), why would he still be wearing his movies clothing? And after he is given back his insignia by the lizard officer, why would everything vanish?
Added Note: in light of all of Spock's tv and film appearances, having someone put on film that Spock and Saavik had a child from a deleted movie scene (these are deleted for a reason- they don't work) is so dreadfully fanboy-ish...AND it ruins Saavik as a character...
Probably not but perhaps.1. Is this canon?
It’s not deaging: they use different actors with prosthetics to look like the originals, enhancing everything with CGI.This is the best de-aging CGI I have ever seen. I looked for artifacts and other anomalies, but the appearances of everyone and their facial expressions were top notch. I hope that if all Star Trek shows get remastered down the line, such tech can be used to fix all sorts of issues, actor replacements and continuity errors.
Makes more sense to me than it being the nexus, as if it was Yor being there is totally preposterous, as was that brief shot of project Lazarus, also why would he see an old saavik (that makes perfect sense in the 24th century) and her and spock’s son?That doesn't make sense...to me it's obviously Kirk's essence travelling towards "heaven" but before he can completely cross over, he enters Spock's final resting place (probably from between Star Trek: Into Darkness and Star Trek Beyond) and both of their consciousnesses meet again before they go on together...
1) good question. Probably the same reason Yor wears a uniform that has no sense with the setting: to immediately making the audience aware of how he is even before seeing the face.Like if this is a regenerated Kirk (I had to go research Picard season 3 since I stopped watching all the shows after Picard season 1), why would he still be wearing his movies clothing? And after he is given back his insignia by the lizard officer, why would everything vanish?
How so?!AND it ruins Saavik as a character...
Gary's scenes used new footage from Lockwood so maybe some deaging there.It’s not deaging: they use different actors with prosthetics to look like the originals, enhancing everything with CGI.
How so?!
I have seen comment elsewhere to the effect that it makes Saavik a predator who molested a vulnerable, teenage-bodied Spock, whose mind McCoy says "is a void".
Which I think is a gross misreading to say the least.
I can understand how people that are not too familiar with amok time may see it that way, but when you consider that McCoy states that without release Spock hormonal imbalances could have killed him it really doesn’t make sense.I have seen comment elsewhere to the effect that it makes Saavik a predator who molested a vulnerable, teenage-bodied Spock, whose mind McCoy says "is a void".
Which I think is a gross misreading to say the least.
It's Colt's service number.3. Is the number a stardate?
About 5'7" if her original actress' height was any indication.I feel like Colt has become OTOY Trek's main character. I wonder what else she'll get up to?![]()
Oh please...you firstYeah, I fail to see how this 'ruins' Saavik. Quite the contrary.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.