I mean, fair enough. It's reasonable to assume the something trashed the ship between then and 2401 where the ship looks nice but isn't space-worthy anymore, at least not for what its designed to do.
If Starfleet is not a military, then someone else is: who?
To move past the war era posturing.
If Starfleet is not a military, then someone else is: who?
And sometimes when not so extreme.
Not directed at you, but this is utterly stupid and invites people to start another war.
You can't just not have a military. This is mind numbingly stupid. It's like not having a police force and expecting no crime. If there's no military, Starfleet fills that role when need be, ding ding ding, Starfleet is the UFP military.
Yeah, it doesn't have to be front lines or anything. Heck, you could just keep it parked in orbit over Earth as a "just in case" thing and use it for non-dangerous missions like hauling people/cargo, maybe more tranquil missions like spending a year checking out a planet. If it can go up against the Borg again with literally no one on board except the bridge, why retire it?
Your video is age restricted.
No idea why the first one was age restricted. Exactly the same scene.
Two questions: How did they move the Spacedock? Do you think any of the shows were "not old enough" to warrant retirement? Not challenging, just curious as to your POV.
Honestly I don't care about how they did it. But I generally like museums
Must have engines, like DS9.
Well, to be fair (and I'm no fan of Matalas), he didn't invent that concept in Star Trek. It goes back to Star Trek III:I chalk this up to bad writing. Matalas thinks a starship's only good for 10-20 years. Stupid.
Wasn't this a dialogue goof, referencing the Enterprise being 20 years old (1966-84) and not the ship's in-universe age of about 40 years (2245-85)?
