• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why is toxic fandom destroying everything?

Were these things in the original text only? I'm pretty sure the only version I have is the one that was revised to bring it into accordance with LOTR.
I've never seen that version of the text.


You can use the "find" function here, but there are references to things like trains and policemen and stuff
 


You can use the "find" function here, but there are references to things like trains and policemen and stuff
Police? As a word exists since the 15th century.

Train could be reference to a robe or dress.

Not sure it's quite the modern experience interpreted as we might from our contemporary perspective.
 
Interesting, I never really thought about how much stuff like that doesn't really fit the more medieval style of most of the books. It seems to all be involving the Hobbits, so maybe they just happen to be advanced than the rest of Middle Earth. Not really sure if I'd count things like the train reference, since that was part of the third person narration, and was just for us modern readers, and necessarily meant to actually fit in Middle Earth.
 
Interesting, I never really thought about how much stuff like that doesn't really fit the more medieval style of most of the books. It seems to all be involving the Hobbits, so maybe they just happen to be advanced than the rest of Middle Earth. Not really sure if I'd count things like the train reference, since that was part of the third person narration, and was just for us modern readers, and necessarily meant to actually fit in Middle Earth.
Indeed.

And it's not really a period piece but an imaginary time with a wide variation of technology and capabilities of various races. It's unique in taking multiple ideas from mythology and folk lore and adding in Tolkien's own love of the rural countryside to create an English spin on different facets of lore.

Add in his own idea that some of the tales came from translating the Red Book and I think anachronistic references could be considered an aspect of translation.
 
From TV Tropes:

Early-Installment Weirdness - The Hobbit: In general, seems like a somewhat fanciful children's tale compared to The Lord of the Rings; Tolkien hadn't even decided it was going to take place in the context of his wider mythology when he originally wrote it. Although modern editions have removed some of the incongruences, earlier versions have oddities like a railroad in the Shire, and Bilbo musing about taking a trip to China.​



... And here's a friendly reminder that The Rise of Skywalker, while mediocre, is still the best Sequel Trilogy Episode. :p

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
From TV Tropes:

Early-Installment Weirdness - The Hobbit: In general, seems like a somewhat fanciful children's tale compared to The Lord of the Rings; Tolkien hadn't even decided it was going to take place in the context of his wider mythology when he originally wrote it. Although modern editions have removed some of the incongruences, earlier versions have oddities like a railroad in the Shire, and Bilbo musing about taking a trip to China.​



... And here's a friendly reminder that The Rise of Skywalker, while mediocre, is still the best Sequel Trilogy Episode. :p

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I love how folks still complain about the "They fly now?" line in ROTS but they were fine with Dune Part 2 having flying Harkonnen troopers.
 


You can use the "find" function here, but there are references to things like trains and policemen and stuff

I would like to get my hands on the first edition Hobbit at this point, but after looking at that article what stands out to me are how some of the references to other, more specific, elements of middle earth changed between editions, presumably as Tolkien's understanding of Middle Earth evolved. There is no context for how the words football, golf, and trains are used but those words have existed at least back to the 1400s and variations of football have been played since before English was a language. The term they do mention "policemen" was meant to used in its context as administrative or government workers and is just referring to how the world there is outside of any administrative jurisdiction.

I would suggest that those words and references were removed for the second edition, not because they would be out of place in a nonindustrial society but rather because he wanted to remove specific "real world" references from the work--which may have been your original point and, if so, I apologize.
 
I'm done responding to you. I've already explained myself clearly and I'm not going repeat myself ad-nsauseum. You've got me pegged wrong and suggest you stop. You're not even barking up the right tree.

Bye then

The biggest criticism are usually around writing, and characters. Those are the most common ones I see. The problem with the dialog that I see is two fold: one, people assume that their experience is universal. That there is some sort of objective standard that characters can abide by and therefore if they won't work then it must be true across the board. Then we end up in circles over whether or not a character is good or not and that detracts from the actual criticism. That doesn't negate the criticism as invalid.

Two, that low performance at the box office or viewership numbers is an indicator of quality. That has nothing to do with criticism but is often wielded as the silencer of dissenting opinion that because it's popular it must be good. Which, really isn't a good indicator one way or the other. It just happens to be the easiest to measure.

Criticism of art is sometimes difficult to nail down. People don't see things the same way, don't connect with characters, don't agree with writing. And criticism is tough because we as people tend to take it very personally, and respond like we've been personally insulted.

That's part of the issue. Too many fans can't take criticism of their criticisms well
 
That's part of the issue. Too many fans can't take criticism of their criticisms well
Sure but that's a learning process right? We are not professionals or have a lot of experience in dealing with criticism. We're not in person making eye contact and talking things out.

Fans not taking criticism is a tale as old as time. Not taking it personally requires more skill, and patience on the part of both parties.

The goal should be an exchange of ideas not a competition. But that requires work.
 
I have never heard anyone complain about flying stormtroopers in Rise of Skywalker.

I think RoS is one of the worst movies I've ever seen in my life and I didn't even notice it had flying stormtroopers.

Plus, didn't Moff Gideon's troopers have jetpacks in Mando season 3, too? Because I loved that season.
 
I actually thought the jetpack troopers were kind of cool. It was the first time it felt like Disney had introduced something 'new' to the trilogy in terms of technological progression. Just like new troopers had been shown off in ESB, with the snowtroopers and jungle troopers. When I saw them, I just considered them a new variation to suit a new environment, thus it didn't bother me too much.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top