Or they could just jump straight over it, like they did with Mordo.How do they do that while she's in Arishem's custody? She needs to be rescued first, hence the need for some sort of follow-up on Eternals. Whether it's in an Eternals sequel or elsewhere, there needs to be some follow-up on her story before she can become an Avenger.
????Why did the first two Deadpool movies make money????
This Deadpool movie would have done very very well even if it wasn't a part of the MCU.
I liked Sam Jackson. I liked Ben Mendlesohn. I liked Emilia Clarke. I liked Don Cheadle.
The plot was a boring, plodding mess.
Rewatching Ms Marvel. Forgot just how fun this show was. First episode was brilliant. Brought back memories of my life as a young nerd.
Ms. Marvel is one of my favorites. Fun, whimsical, innocent and yet full of thrilling moments and risks to Kamala's safety. They got the formula for that series just right.
I honestly didn't even like any of them as much as I should have. The characterization was almost as bad as the plot. The only genuinely great character scene in the show was Rhodey confronting Fury and even that was rendered completely meaningless by the big plot twist.
As a huge fan of the Ms. Marvel comics, Iman Vellani is absolutely perfect casting casting and the show really has the right atmosphere and fun factor. I just wish they'd bothered to make her powers look right and come up with some better ideas on the villain side. Going with a flabby mish mash of Damage Control and Clan Destine was not a great decision.
I might have made a Billion. It kind of depends on what kind of movie would have been made without Jackman.
Take away Jackman, the costume and the other old characters like Snipes and X23 and the movie would've broke even but that's it.
I do believe they call that "moving the goalposts".![]()
I... don't want whatever you're smoking.![]()
I'm saying without the gutless fanservice (mainly Jackman coming back), this movie wouldn't have been as successful
You also said that a sequel to two 785m dollar movies couldn't possibly have broken even (on a 200m budget) without all the extra fanservice that wasn't in the first two movies.
gutless fanservice
You're saying that now. Your original claim was "The only reason DP and W made money was because they brought Jackman back and put him in costume. That's it"I'm saying without the gutless fanservice (mainly Jackman coming back), this movie wouldn't have been as successful
They could have found another fan service hook to reel people in. The more gutless the better.I agree with the idea that a portion of the box office exists only due to Jackman. I think only a fool would claim otherwise.
You also said that a sequel to two 785m dollar movies couldn't possibly have broken even (on a 200m budget) without all the extra fanservice that wasn't in the first two movies.
There's a reason why we waited so long for a 3rd movie, Reynolds admitted he couldn't think of ideas after DP2.They could have found another fan service hook to reel people in. The more gutless the better.
And he came up an idea. Not seeing a problem.There's a reason why we waited so long for a 3rd movie, Reynolds admitted he couldn't think of ideas after DP2.
And it could have been worse, some folks thought this movie would end with them going to Endgame and saving Tony and keeping Steve from leaving and wiping out everything since Endgame out too.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.