It's a tightbeam comms laser and long range sensor dishes: those dishes are also at the front of the saucer section too (they're either side of the thin deflector array), but I wanted the ship to have aft sensor coverage as well.What are those two dish-like objects at the end of the secondary hull? With what seems to be some type of weapon in between?
Thanks guys
It's a tightbeam comms laser and long range sensor dishes: those dishes are also at the front of the saucer section too (they're either side of the thin deflector array), but I wanted the ship to have aft sensor coverage as well.
There are also shorter range sensor clusters in a few locations around the rim of the saucer, and one at the bottom of the engineering hull.
Haha, good eye! Yes, the interiors are a combination of largely era-incorrect star trek images and, umm... old kitchen interior renders of mine that have been hacked and skewed into place.I echo what everyone else has said: Erebus is gorgeous! And do I spy an LCARS display throught that viewport on the close-up of the secondary hull deflector housing?
This got me looking up some real life comparisons and it undercored for me how perception is important when appreciating the size of vehicles. NX Class ships come in at around 225m, which is pretty huge when it comes to flying objects. Real-life aircraft like the Antonov AN-225 are 84m in length, 88m in width, and that thing was a monster. Spacex Starship upper stage is about 50m, which also seems absolutely huge to me. But an NX would dwarf either of those craft if it actually existed.What amazes the most.... She's basically the smallest of all the classes that ever had a ship named Enterprise, yet with all the details you added, you made this class look positively huge! And, let's be honest, if we saw one for real right now, we would be gobsmacked by how big it is.
But this is the first time the NX has actually looked big to me.
Glad you liked the way it turned out!
This got me looking up some real life comparisons and it undercored for me how perception is important when appreciating the size of vehicles. NX Class ships come in at around 225m, which is pretty huge when it comes to flying objects. Real-life aircraft like the Antonov AN-225 are 84m in length, 88m in width, and that thing was a monster. Spacex Starship upper stage is about 50m, which also seems absolutely huge to me. But an NX would dwarf either of those craft if it actually existed.
Conversely ocean-going ships frequently exceed an NX in length:
Iowa Class: 262m
Nimitz Class: 332m
Seaside Giant: 458m
All are easily longer than an NX, but I would still be more impressed by a 225m object that could fly. I think it was pretty smart of Doug Drexler to constrain the NX dimensions to something that we can appreciate and perceive in real-life terms. Because if you start getting into km scale objects, they become totally abstract, and one can therefore no longer perceive if something is big or not.
Glad you liked the way it turned out!
This got me looking up some real life comparisons and it undercored for me how perception is important when appreciating the size of vehicles. NX Class ships come in at around 225m, which is pretty huge when it comes to flying objects. Real-life aircraft like the Antonov AN-225 are 84m in length, 88m in width, and that thing was a monster. Spacex Starship upper stage is about 50m, which also seems absolutely huge to me. But an NX would dwarf either of those craft if it actually existed.
Conversely ocean-going ships frequently exceed an NX in length:
Iowa Class: 262m
Nimitz Class: 332m
Seaside Giant: 458m
All are easily longer than an NX, but I would still be more impressed by a 225m object that could fly. I think it was pretty smart of Doug Drexler to constrain the NX dimensions to something that we can appreciate and perceive in real-life terms. Because if you start getting into km scale objects, they become totally abstract, and one can therefore no longer perceive if something is big or not.
That is true. I've seen the airship hangar at Moffat, and the remains of a base in Miami (it's a railroad museum now, but one corner of the old hangar is still there, and it's startling when you imagine how large the whole building must have been). There's another blimp hangar outside Berlin that was converted into an indoor tropical resort.I think this perception of size also depends on whether you grew up with the massive rigid airships pre-WW1...
Ships like the USS Macon were 239m in length so it would've been a heck of a sight to see back then.
Honestly I always thought the NX class was still too big for Earth’s first true starship. While much shorter, she’s not far off the volume of the Constitution-class due to all those convex rounded shapes… in fact due to the NX nacelles being much smaller than the Constitution nacelles the NX actually has a larger habitable volume! And that’s before the secondary hull refit! The NX should have been much more cramped and submarine-like. Probably would have made the sets harder to film in though.All are easily longer than an NX, but I would still be more impressed by a 225m object that could fly.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.