Pretty sure I learned of this in grad school, a decade ago.As far as I know it's the first anybody has ever seen a non-human animal apply a treatment like that to purposefully treat a wound.
In the spirit of that thought, there is this:I love how we have to keep reedifying what makes humans different from other animals, because every time we come up with something we think only we do, someone stumbles across an animal doing it.
Good for you. Lot of people don't know about this. It's not a fluff piece.Pretty sure I learned of this in grad school, a decade ago.
Perils of having to read academic journals for ten years I guess.I follow this kind of stuff pretty closely, and I've never heard of it being seen before.
I talked to my mom about this this morning, and she thought the same thing you did, so I guess this might not be as big of a deal as I thought.
CBC said:While other primates have been seen self-medicating with plants, or even bugs, the researchers say this is the first time a wild animal has been observed applying a plant that has documented medicinal properties.
Liana, a.k.a. Fibraurea tinctoria, is an evergreen vine known for its antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-fungal and antioxidant qualities. It's used in modern and traditional medicine, including malaria treatment.
"That's why that behaviour is so special, because he treated his wound with a quite potent medical plant," Laumer said.
Not sure why.But I do still stand by my point about having to constantly redefine what separates us from other animals.
I don't always go the extra mile but when I do it's because I've missed my exit.
Was watching the latest Blue Bloods ep and Selleck actually said the phrase "2400 hours". That's not actually a thing, is it?![]()
Yes. In military time, midnight is 24 hundred hours (24:00) or zero-hundred hours (0:00).
Thanks.There’s maybe a bit of clarification in the accompanying article:
So that’s why it’s considered newsworthy, even though other animals have also been seen self-medicating.
Also, it’s probably worthwhile noting that this is in the news cycle right now because the study about it was just published in Nature, but the actual incident occurred in 2022.
I just find it funny that some people are so desperate to prove that we're better than animals, and every time they think they have, they get proven wrong again.Not sure why.
I just go back to our moral sense. It's pretty simple to me.I just find it funny that some people are so desperate to prove that we're better than animals, and every time they think they have, they get proven wrong again.
The problem is the egotistical demand that there *must* be such a fundamental difference in the first place.I love how we have to keep reedifying what makes humans different from other animals, because every time we come up with something we think only we do, someone stumbles across an animal doing it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.