What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?
- Thread starter Amasov
- Start date
Kes was a much better character once she broke up with Neelix, and episodes like Before and After and Warlord showcased that she had some serious acting chops that they had wasted in the first two seasons.
IMHO they should have had Kim die, as they originally had planned, considering he went on to do nothing for the next four seasons, and Garrett Wang's range was limited enough when they gave him chances to shine (like Nightingale) it was generally meh.
Dan Simmons in his "Hyperion" series has a character use the honorific "M" which works as you suggest. The only distinction was that androids were typically referred to with the honorific "A"
One would have to understand the M is an honorific and not first initial. It worked well in the novel(s) because the reader already knew the characters names and the individual was speaking to a group.
As a non-native speaker I get sometimes annoyed by neo-pronouns, because they're hella' confusing (plural singular? What?).
And then there's this shit.
And this is the last post about Mr Mrs Ms Miss or Mx none of which are Star Trek related. Take it to TNZ and discuss at your leisure.
Ok to get back on track, controversial Trek opinion...Archer was the best Trek captain
Carry on
Damn. No need to drop this nuke right away.
How about "Archer was the best Federation President" then?
I mean, Ra-Ghoratreii and Jaresh-Inyo got nearly assassinated and nearly deposed, respectively. Hiram Roth might be the next most strong rival for pardoning Admiral Kirk and crew.
And two of them don't even have canon names.
I mean, Ra-Ghoratreii and Jaresh-Inyo got nearly assassinated and nearly deposed, respectively. Hiram Roth might be the next most strong rival for pardoning Admiral Kirk and crew.
And two of them don't even have canon names.
Faith of the Heart Restored.™
How does getting nearly assassinated make you a poor president? Theodore Roosevelt got shot and he's consistently ranked as one of the greatest US presidents.
How about "Archer was the best Federation President" then?
I mean, Ra-Ghoratreii and Jaresh-Inyo got nearly assassinated and nearly deposed, respectively. Hiram Roth might be the next most strong rival for pardoning Admiral Kirk and crew.
And two of them don't even have canon names.
Going off of what we know in canon...
Archer
- the start of Starfleet keeping the peace for a century
Hiram Roth
- whale probe crisis; maybe the Genesis crisis as well; pardons Kirk and crew
Ra-Ghoratreii
- Khitomer Conspiracy, peace with the Klingons achieved after 70 years of conflict, El Aurian refugees, "death" of Kirk
Jaresh-Inyo
- Changeling infiltration of Earth, Klingons dissolve peace treaty with the Federation, and stars a war with the Cardassians, and Dominion war starts; Battle of Sector 001. Maquis attacks a Cardassian colony with biogenic weapons, and Sisko gasses a planet in return. I suppose you could add losing Voyager and the Ba’ku resettlement conspiracy as well.
Anton Chekov
- 2401 Frontier Day takeover
Liara Rillak
- Federation rebuilt after the Burn, Species Ten-C crisis
Idk, who's the best. But Jaresh-Inyo is definitely the worst of the ones listed.
Last edited:
We now have Anton Chekov in 2401 but hear only his voice as the Borg plot is unfolding and assimilating young cadets and officers. So that makes six Federation Presidents we know the names of.
Best Federation president is Nan Bacco, hands down. And no, she's not canon. 
And sticking with non-canon, the worst president was Min Zife. Would have been "Ishan Anjar", but he was technically only president pro tempore.
TrekLit FTW!
And sticking with non-canon, the worst president was Min Zife. Would have been "Ishan Anjar", but he was technically only president pro tempore.
TrekLit FTW!
Yeah, seriously. We've only had 955 pages to build up to that. You've got to ease us into it more.
My wife thinks he best after Sisko. I am also a big Archer fan, too. He doesn't get enough love, really. (Nor does ENT, actually.)
If you're objectively looking at importance within the overall narrative of the entire franchise, Archer is a linchpin for the entire Trek universe.
- Pulls together all of the races who are the founders of the Federation, and implied to be an important figure in the Earth-Romulan War
- Responsible for reforming Vulcan society
- Saves Earth from the Xindi weapon
- Saves the Prime Timeline and ends the Temporal Cold War
But from season 3 on I thought Bakula and the writers found a groove where I bought Archer as someone who could be the captain of people out in deep space encountering weirdness, who understood the weight of it, but also as someone that aliens like Shran would honestly be like "hey, these humans aren't so bad" if you were dealing with him.
Umm, no. Just...no.Archer was pretty good.
Janeway is best.
Janeway is the best Captain with the name Kathryn. There's that.
Similar threads
- Locked
