• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC Movies - To Infinity and Beyond

If your first big decision in charge of DC films is to say "I have no faith in people turning out for a Superman movie so I'd better stick all these other characters in there," you're not off to a good start.
 
Hey, remember how Gunn's The Suicide Squad was all about Javelin, Savant and Weasel?
Exactly. Fillon had small cameos or supporting roles in several GOTG films and in The Suicide Squad. I’d be surprised if his role here was anything more.

Given also the ages of Corenswet and Brosnahan, as compared to Nathan, I would hazard a guess that his Guy Gardener is just to show that the Green Lantern Corps exist in this universe; they’ll probably use a younger actor to play Hal Jordan or John Stewart in a future film.
 
Gunn responds to concerns about adding these characters to Superman: Legacy:
When a fan asked what moved Gunn to include these characters in Superman: Legacy, the director replied, “They fit the story I’m telling. Story always comes first.”

[...]

A concerned fan asked Gunn to keep the focus on Lois and Clark to which the filmmaker said, “The primary story most definitely revolves around Superman and Lois.”
https://deadline.com/2023/07/james-...-gardner-hawkgirl-mister-terrific-1235434964/

Pretty much what I would have expected him to say, but ... the "primary" story? :shifty: A more reassuring answer would be, "Of course, everything in my Superman movie revolves around Superman and Lois."
 
I'm a big fan of Nathan Fillion so I'm pretty happy with his casting.
I am a little surprised to see other big name heroes in the movie, but I trust Gunn to know what he's doing. Despite what some people seem to think, it is possible for a movie to feature multiple heroes and still focus on the title character.
 
Isn’t this a world where Superman is not the first hero? If so, I’d expect these to be minor appearances to set them up for other projects while reinforcing the fact that Superman is new-ish. A bit early to be panicking, non?
 
Wasn't Edi Gathegi long rumored to be Richard Reeds for the MCU? Or am I mixing names up here?

And yes, rumored does not mean cast. They're no way near that.
 
Should they rename it "Black Adam 2"?

Can't believe they're going back to "Go directly to 'Justice League'. Do not pass Go" again.

It is the nature of the beast (movies) and its source: the DCEU and MCU were created with the (partial) intention of producing a cinematic "world" or "universe", as the days of Rami / Norrington / Singer / Webb were over. In other words, after the DCEU and MCU, the new superhero movie model was going to hint at a larger world or drop representatives of said world in the film, because again, that's the nature of comics which people--even the non-initiated John and Jane Q. Public--are aware of.

Gunn has no choice (rather, Zaslav may not give him a choice) but to come out of the gates building the larger world, and after so many Superman solo films and TV episodes throughout history, one might argue that few want to see another solo film, whether its of the "..rocketed from another planet" variety, or a strict, "all alone in his freshmen year" type of story.

I'm not at all surprised about this news.
 
few want to see another solo film
Just call me "few," then.

Still, I'm trying to accept the counsel of some of my favorite posters not to kneejerk overreact.

And here's more reassurance from Gunn:
I’ve never used one movie to set up another movie. The characters are there because they help to tell Superman’s story better, not so we can set up separate projects in the franchise. Superman and Lois are the very clear protagonists.
https://www.threads.net/t/CumltYyLOxr/
 
Metamorpho?!? Metamorpho!!

The Element Man is one of my favorite characters of all time, and I am thrilled he's finally getting some exposure on the big screen. Wow. Metamorpho.
 
Yeah, it's a little less mealy-mouthed and equivocal than the "primary story" business.

That's open to interpretation as well.
There can be a secondary Jimmy Olsen story, or Ma and Pa Kent story, the villain story or anything peripheral but still important to the Superman and Lois story.
 
So we have the asshole hero, the violent hero, the freak/ outcast hero and Mr. Terrific who could slot into any or all of those in addition to being the brilliant hero.

Superman’s “legacy” will be teaching Guy to be less of an asshole, Hawkgirl to be less violent, teaching Rex that people will judge him by his actions not his looks, and whatever Mr. Terrific needs to be a better hero.

I hope this isn’t the film, but those characters are just an odd collection of characters with little connection to each other outside of Hawkgirl and Mr. Terrific who were in the JSA.


Also, I still miss Superman being the first hero, even after all these decades.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top