I did that with Return of the Jedi then Empire Strikes Back then Star Wars.which established for me, a theme of watching sequels at the movies, without having seen the original, until years later
Strangely, Star Wars remains my favorite.
I did that with Return of the Jedi then Empire Strikes Back then Star Wars.which established for me, a theme of watching sequels at the movies, without having seen the original, until years later
The studio’s desire to make this the last original series movie was, in my opinion a terrible marketing move.
But I don't rate a Star Trek film on its relevance. I rate it on how it holds up as a movie. I liked it more in 1991 because it was exciting and funny. Over time, the seams really show. But none of my opinion is based on whether or not I am connecting with the Russia allegory. Messages in Star Trek were always "bonus" material for me.
Agreed about the allegory. I watch movies and TV to be entertained. I want something that is fun to watch and something that I will enjoy. I don't give a rat's ass about tying a movie into current events. I get enough of that excrement in real life. Some people enjoy and want that stuff. I don't. Keep your damned message out of my entertainment.
On a more positive note, I think I like TUC more now than I did when it was released, the message notwithstanding. Same with TMP. However, Wrath of Khan will always be my favorite original cast Star Trek movie.
Both Wrath and Undiscovered Country are the two best Star Trek movies, period.
Which is reasonable. I do not think any really come close to those two. Maybe First Contact. Maybe.Well, they're certainly your favorites, but whether they are both the best is arguable.
I didn't like Kirk's "they're animals" and "let them die" sentiments (neither did William Shatner, interestingly)
But he did know he had a son.I didn't like Kirk's "they're animals" and "let them die" sentiments (neither did William Shatner, interestingly), particularly when he didn't even know he had a son for most all of his life.
I watched the 4K Blu Ray of The Wrath of Khan last night. I have seen this film at least a dozen times, but this time I looked at it with fresh eyes and got some really good feels out of it. Certain things that I really took note of…
The performances of the regulars are really well done and layered. Whether or not Meyer had to tire Shatner out or not, he got a really well considered performance out of him. Nimoy is also very relaxed as Spock and the sweet banter between these two old friends is really great. I don’t think their relationship felt this natural or warm again. Spock was too busy re-learning, being funny or just “different” in later films. This is really the last time we get OG Spock.
Carol Marcus is charming, tough, smart and brilliant. Bibi Besch was incredibly good in the role and the films lost something when she wasn’t asked back.
Merritt Butrick was also quite good as David and his reconciliation scene with Kirk still hits me harder than Spock’s death.
Kirstie Alley’s performance is oddly stilted in the first 2/3 of the film. I think it’s the bad ADR (this film is filled with bad sonics for the dialog) because unless you’re really good at it, dialog looping can be a few levels down from the stage performance. In the scenes where she doesn’t sound overdubbed, she’s much better. But really, it didn’t bother me when Robin Curtis replaced her because Curtis is frankly a better actor. She just got bad direction.
Khan’s story isn’t nearly as involving for me as Kirk’s. Kirk’s has dimension, Khan has Montalban. He chews the scenery beautifully but for me the real draw is Shatner playing Kirk’s arc.
After this film, Shatner started changing is approach. This is the last time we get the self-doubting Kirk. From here on, the confidence and then the cockiness grows.
Star Trek III is still my favorite, but Star Trek II is rightfully considered the best. Even with the plot holes, so much of it fell into place that those holes don’t really matter. It’s one of the few films that I can start over from the beginning as soon as it ends. Just to stay in that world. Star Trek VI really doesn't hit these heights. It's far too self aware and proud of its own "cleverness" for me. Had they kept some of the forced gags out of it (and made Chekov less of an idiot), it would have worked better for me.
Wrath of Khan hands down. After the letdown of TMP, TWOK was like a breath of fresh air into the franchise and exactly what a Trek movie should be and TMP was not. It gave us a lot of what fandom had be jonesing for in the lean years of the 70's, including realistic character development (the aging crew angle) and the first full-fledged space battle. It also gave us one of the most memorable and emotional plot twists in Trek history by the death of Spock. Even if one suspected it might not be a permanent state, no true fan came away from at least the first viewing with dry eyes.
TUC on the other hand was not a bad movie per say, but just more like what TWOK wasn't and devoid of a lot of its spirit. It was a good send off to the TOS crew and I liked that it bridged the gap between the TOS and TNG era by planting the seeds of the Federation-Klingon Alliance as well as the dramatic portrayal of how even in a utopian future, peace can still be a difficult concept to embrace and change, even for good, doesn't come easy for some. I also liked that after years of the first mention of Sulu being scheduled to command the Excelsior in various extended-universe and non-canon sources, we finally got to see it.
My only two somewhat constant criticisms have been the concept of the wide conspiracy that involved Starfleet members and the level of violence.
For the first, maybe my thinking had been clouded by years of viewing the Federation as this perfect construct and how I wish the future will be, but most likely won't. So, I did take issue with the idea of this vision being somewhat tarnished by revealing there were those that still were willing to keep the killing machinery going, either due to personal benefit or mistrust. I also didn't enjoy the revealing of Valeris being revealed the traitor maybe because I never liked her as a character as she just seemed uninteresting to the point when her deception was revealed, it was like "ho-hum". Having the original concept of Saavik returning and be the traitor would have been shocking and made the movie much better.
For the second issue that of the violence, while it's true TWOK pushed a lot of the boundaries of gore, particularly with its ear worm scenes, the Klingon assassinations really amped it up a level, giving us the first Trek film above a PG rating. While I have no issue with sex & violence being the staple of other forms of entertainment (though over-reliance on it shows lazy story creation), I never felt it should be part & parcel of Trek, even though it had been making creeping inroads (at least the bloody violence part) since TWOK. This is perhaps one of the biggest reasons I despise STD so much as well as the idea that was floated of a Quentin Tarantino Trek; as Star Trek should never be R-rated entertainment.
Kirk in the first half of ST III isn't cocky at all. Still mourning Spock and full of doubts.
Doesn't matter what was in a previous script. What matters is what was finished and what was finished indicates that Kirk knew he had a son and that his name was David.As originally scripted, neither Kirk nor David knew about their relationship. The scene was later reshot.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.