• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Wrath of Khan vs The Undiscovered Country

which is best?

  • Wrath of Khan

    Votes: 79 71.2%
  • Undiscovered Country

    Votes: 32 28.8%

  • Total voters
    111
I love TUC. I was 12 at the time. 13 when it came out on VHS here in the UK. I saved up and rented it from Blockbuster Video at least twice, drove my parents nuts wanting to re-watch it. I loved how it tied in to Unification Part 1 and 2. Star Trek had developed into a modern myth that was neatly bound together in Homeric fashion, its one of the reasons why I think so many fans take issue with DSC et.al.

For me, Star Trek VI is the best of the Original Series movies, a culmination of all the movies that came before it. It combines the epic scale and ideas driven plot of The Motion Picture with the action and excitement of The Wrath of Khan, the emotional heart of The Search For Spock, the humour of The Voyage Home and the sense of family that was explored in The Final Frontier. Its the perfect swansong for the Original Series and elegantly passes the baton on to The Next Generation.

Incidentally, the surround sound on this one is much better than any of the other classic movies and I love the score. I think its still the only Star Trek movie to win a Saturn Award for best Science Fiction film.

The studio’s desire to make this the last original series movie was, in my opinion a terrible marketing move. Star Trek VI would be the 15th highest grossing film of 1991 and have the best opening weekend of any movie in the series up to that date. Star Trek VI had a worldwide take of around a hundred million dollars from a twenty five million dollar budget. This profit excludes VHS, DVD,Blu-Ray and 4K sales.
 
The studio’s desire to make this the last original series movie was, in my opinion a terrible marketing move.

Wasn't a marketing move so much as it was facing reality. The cast was getting expensive (Shatner and Nimoy were each pulling down $6 million per movie by that point) and getting older (Kelley, notably, was already in rapidly declining health). Meanwhile, The Next Generation was one of the hottest shows on television.
 
between the two, I think TWOK was superior, but I like them both. But after the good folks over at OTOY had put out their Memory Wall clips, I find myself thinking more about the "styles of storytelling" we saw in the TOS cast movies. And I find myself appreciating TMP even more than before.

TWOK brought us a fun action flick with great visual effects, a compelling villain, a little bit of humanizing humor, and a gut wrenching ending. It was a somewhat classic framework nd worked well. TUC was similar, but I found it to be more political intrigue in a scifi setting. What I appreciate about both is that, for the most part, they took themselves seriously. The movies in between were slipping into silliness which I didnt like, peaking at TFF. Im glad TUC brought us back to something that wasnt intended to be borderline comedic.

What TMP had was the grand "mysteries in deep space" kinda story telling. Putting aside the production problems, and the edge of your seats script development, it captured the mystique of what I think Star Trek stories *could* have been. More in tune with 2001:ASO style of storytelling.
 
But I don't rate a Star Trek film on its relevance. I rate it on how it holds up as a movie. I liked it more in 1991 because it was exciting and funny. Over time, the seams really show. But none of my opinion is based on whether or not I am connecting with the Russia allegory. Messages in Star Trek were always "bonus" material for me.

Agreed about the allegory. I watch movies and TV to be entertained. I want something that is fun to watch and something that I will enjoy. I don't give a rat's ass about tying a movie into current events. I get enough of that excrement in real life. Some people enjoy and want that stuff. I don't. Keep your damned message out of my entertainment.

On a more positive note, I think I like TUC more now than I did when it was released, the message notwithstanding. Same with TMP. However, Wrath of Khan will always be my favorite original cast Star Trek movie.
 
Last edited:
Kind of a self-serving retweet lol. Anyway, still TWoK. TUC is good, though I think Meyer went a little overboard with the old naval feel. Actual books on the bridge was a bit much.
 
Agreed about the allegory. I watch movies and TV to be entertained. I want something that is fun to watch and something that I will enjoy. I don't give a rat's ass about tying a movie into current events. I get enough of that excrement in real life. Some people enjoy and want that stuff. I don't. Keep your damned message out of my entertainment.

On a more positive note, I think I like TUC more now than I did when it was released, the message notwithstanding. Same with TMP. However, Wrath of Khan will always be my favorite original cast Star Trek movie.

Now that you mention it, the films with the most obvious message are those I tend to enjoy the least - even though I don't hate any of the Star Trek features. Not a single one.

The Voyage Home falls to the bottom of my list in favorites order of the first 6 mostly because I don't like Star Trek as a full comedy and also because the "save the whales" message is delivered with all the subtlety of a gunshot to the face. Hell they STOP THE MOVIE to show us Kirk and Spock watching a documentary on whale hunting when they get to the institute. And Catherine Hicks is just grating. Also Leonard Rosenman.

TUC: same, the message was shouted at me with a bullhorn. "Klingons are like the Russians and we have to WORK TOGETHER!" also "RACISM IS BAD!" Got it. Also. Jokes.

TFF: Don't believe religious cult leaders who are too wrapped up in their own vanity. And "embrace your pain." At least it was fun with a great score.

The first 3? Incredible, easily my favorites. The messages are much more subtle and their aimed at a more serious, dare I say adult, audience. There was far less winking and self-awareness.
 
Both Wrath and Undiscovered Country are the two best Star Trek movies, period. They are very different films though. One is a revenge plot built using the scaffolds of Moby Dick and the other is a political commentary about the end of the Cold War and the way older people interact with the idea that they can/should no longer hate & despise their old enemy.

Of the two, I like The Undiscovered Country more than Wrath but not by much. The two movies are really in a league of their own compared to the other movies.
 
Frankly, I liked Star Trek VI more in the overall because of the fact that it entails the fact that decades of distrust tend to be hard to let go of, and this shows that both sides had serious misgivings about the idea over various reasons.

The fact that it's not uncommon to see plots form in organizations which are not always in the interest of the organization as a whole is also something this covered decently for the time.

I didn't like Kirk's "they're animals" and "let them die" sentiments (neither did William Shatner, interestingly), particularly when he didn't even know he had a son for most all of his life.
 
I didn't like Kirk's "they're animals" and "let them die" sentiments (neither did William Shatner, interestingly), particularly when he didn't even know he had a son for most all of his life.
But he did know he had a son.

Kirk: Is that David?
Kirk: I did what you wanted. I stayed away. Why didn't you tell him?

Kirk always knew he had a son named David but he never believed in the possibility he'd ever reconnect with him. Even cements that idea further when he addresses that his son might even help Khan try to kill him. That scene with Kirk and David in his quarters was a moment Kirk thought would never happen. Here is Kirk beaten and dealing with the loss of his best friend and his son shows him that there is still something he can admire about him. David helped give Kirk new confidence in himself. That's a lot of important stuff that was taken away from Kirk by the Klingons for no reason.
 
As originally scripted, neither Kirk nor David knew about their relationship. The scene was later reshot. Here is the original:

Picture1.jpg
 
In one of the deleted scenes of twok from the theatrical version, when kirk has returned to the enterprise fomr the genesis planet, and theyre climbing through jefferies tubes to get to the bridge, he exclaims " I have a son!" to spock. I think that scene was brought back in later releases but the dialog was scrubbed.
 
I watched the 4K Blu Ray of The Wrath of Khan last night. I have seen this film at least a dozen times, but this time I looked at it with fresh eyes and got some really good feels out of it. Certain things that I really took note of…

The performances of the regulars are really well done and layered. Whether or not Meyer had to tire Shatner out or not, he got a really well considered performance out of him. Nimoy is also very relaxed as Spock and the sweet banter between these two old friends is really great. I don’t think their relationship felt this natural or warm again. Spock was too busy re-learning, being funny or just “different” in later films. This is really the last time we get OG Spock.

Carol Marcus is charming, tough, smart and brilliant. Bibi Besch was incredibly good in the role and the films lost something when she wasn’t asked back.

Merritt Butrick was also quite good as David and his reconciliation scene with Kirk still hits me harder than Spock’s death.

Kirstie Alley’s performance is oddly stilted in the first 2/3 of the film. I think it’s the bad ADR (this film is filled with bad sonics for the dialog) because unless you’re really good at it, dialog looping can be a few levels down from the stage performance. In the scenes where she doesn’t sound overdubbed, she’s much better. But really, it didn’t bother me when Robin Curtis replaced her because Curtis is frankly a better actor. She just got bad direction.

Khan’s story isn’t nearly as involving for me as Kirk’s. Kirk’s has dimension, Khan has Montalban. He chews the scenery beautifully but for me the real draw is Shatner playing Kirk’s arc.

After this film, Shatner started changing is approach. This is the last time we get the self-doubting Kirk. From here on, the confidence and then the cockiness grows.

Star Trek III is still my favorite, but Star Trek II is rightfully considered the best. Even with the plot holes, so much of it fell into place that those holes don’t really matter. It’s one of the few films that I can start over from the beginning as soon as it ends. Just to stay in that world. Star Trek VI really doesn't hit these heights. It's far too self aware and proud of its own "cleverness" for me. Had they kept some of the forced gags out of it (and made Chekov less of an idiot), it would have worked better for me.

Kirk in the first half of ST III isn't cocky at all. Still mourning Spock and full of doubts.
 
Wrath of Khan hands down. After the letdown of TMP, TWOK was like a breath of fresh air into the franchise and exactly what a Trek movie should be and TMP was not. It gave us a lot of what fandom had be jonesing for in the lean years of the 70's, including realistic character development (the aging crew angle) and the first full-fledged space battle. It also gave us one of the most memorable and emotional plot twists in Trek history by the death of Spock. Even if one suspected it might not be a permanent state, no true fan came away from at least the first viewing with dry eyes.

TUC on the other hand was not a bad movie per say, but just more like what TWOK wasn't and devoid of a lot of its spirit. It was a good send off to the TOS crew and I liked that it bridged the gap between the TOS and TNG era by planting the seeds of the Federation-Klingon Alliance as well as the dramatic portrayal of how even in a utopian future, peace can still be a difficult concept to embrace and change, even for good, doesn't come easy for some. I also liked that after years of the first mention of Sulu being scheduled to command the Excelsior in various extended-universe and non-canon sources, we finally got to see it.

My only two somewhat constant criticisms have been the concept of the wide conspiracy that involved Starfleet members and the level of violence.

For the first, maybe my thinking had been clouded by years of viewing the Federation as this perfect construct and how I wish the future will be, but most likely won't. So, I did take issue with the idea of this vision being somewhat tarnished by revealing there were those that still were willing to keep the killing machinery going, either due to personal benefit or mistrust. I also didn't enjoy the revealing of Valeris being revealed the traitor maybe because I never liked her as a character as she just seemed uninteresting to the point when her deception was revealed, it was like "ho-hum". Having the original concept of Saavik returning and be the traitor would have been shocking and made the movie much better.

For the second issue that of the violence, while it's true TWOK pushed a lot of the boundaries of gore, particularly with its ear worm scenes, the Klingon assassinations really amped it up a level, giving us the first Trek film above a PG rating. While I have no issue with sex & violence being the staple of other forms of entertainment (though over-reliance on it shows lazy story creation), I never felt it should be part & parcel of Trek, even though it had been making creeping inroads (at least the bloody violence part) since TWOK. This is perhaps one of the biggest reasons I despise STD so much as well as the idea that was floated of a Quentin Tarantino Trek; as Star Trek should never be R-rated entertainment.

If TWOK had been released in 1984, it would have been a PG-13 rating.
 
Kirk in the first half of ST III isn't cocky at all. Still mourning Spock and full of doubts.

The only time when I think he's particularly cocky in TSFS is when they're stealing the Enterprise, and part of that may be an act to keep his friends' spirits up.

He certainly isn't cocky later in the film.
 
As originally scripted, neither Kirk nor David knew about their relationship. The scene was later reshot.
Doesn't matter what was in a previous script. What matters is what was finished and what was finished indicates that Kirk knew he had a son and that his name was David.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top