I think I saw Shatner in there.
I love the flying car. And it does look like the one that someone posted upthread.
It's not a flying car, and it doesn't "look like" the Aptera, it IS an Aptera.
I love the flying car. And it does look like the one that someone posted upthread.
It's not a flying car, and it doesn't "look like" the Aptera, it IS an Aptera.
My assumption is that in the movie, it will be a flying car.
Go put on some looser shorts, m'okay? It's just a make-believe show.
Jeez.
Would you say the same thing if it were a Toyota Corolla with CA plates in those shots?
Not to speak for T'Bonz, but I'd say no -- because there's a clear difference. 99% of the audience isn't going to have a clue that this is a real, contemporary automobile. It doesn't look much at all like a car of today, and appears clearly to have been designed with a retro-futuristic aesthetic -- one that meshes beautifully with Star Trek.
As for the Corolla, every single person in the audience would think something along the lines of "what's my neighbor's car doing on Star Trek"?
I get your point, but I contend that the car is not a prop for the movie, and won't be seen in the film. If you look at the spy pics, it's clearly well out of the way of all the "action", as it were. In other words, it's clearly "backstage".
Regarding the Car being out of view.. if you notice, it's actually plugged in and getting charged apparently.1. The vehicle was driven along the east-west driveway south of the Quad to time exactly with the walk down the exterior staircase in that scene I referred to as involving Pine and Quinto (although now I’ve been told that Quinto wasn’t actually there; it must have been a look-alike). This was done in such a way so that as the camera swung clockwise from focusing on the pair of them walking down the stairs to follow the action as Pine stopped abruptly and in such a way as to face Pine, the vehicle’s passage would have been visible behind him. This scene was repeatedly a number of times and the vehicle was driven east to west correspondingly. The vehicle sometimes stopped short and returned to its starting place right next to the planetarium building when the director called for a return to places for whatever reason.
2. The vehicle was driven along the same path in both directions during various general takes.
man I hate star trek
I do too. But I really like JJ Abrams. So it's a toss up for me.
Yea Star Trek is wack.
That kind of disapoints me.
I like the comments on this site. So much for the supposed mass appeal of Star Trek.
man I hate star trekYea Star Trek is wack.That kind of disapoints me.Nice pics though.
The computer needs something as reference to tell it where to put stuff, otherwise they'd have to position the CGI manually for every single frame. The bluescreen also has markers on it. I'm guessing they'll insert a shot of the golden gate or something for the bluescreen.
There seems to be 4 groups, which I cut out of the AICN pics: (I see Dan's post, he sees 4 groups too, so I guess I didn't overlook anyone)
...the other "SFA 122.8".
I hope we don't have to go there again.[...], with pants tucked into boots [...]
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.