We wish... but according to Janeway, that salamander thing totally happened.I would add the caveat that if something on screen is so bad everyone hates it, the fans consensus overrules it.
^Again, not how canon works.
Indeed. Here are some definitions (mostly to satisfy my inner word nerd):
Canon (most appropriate definition from Meriam Webster): [Middle English, from Late Latin, from Latin, standard]
a
: an authoritative list of books accepted as Holy Scripture
b: the authentic works of a writer
the Chaucer canon
c: a sanctioned or accepted group or body of related works
the canon of great literature
---vs.---
Continuity: a: uninterrupted connection, succession, or union
NahEverything is canon, except you have to translate the seriousness level and tone to explain how the sillier Treks are canon.
Nah. This isn't a democracy. And if it was, fans wouldn't get a vote.I would add the caveat that if something on screen is so bad everyone hates it, the fans consensus overrules it.
What are we calling a "sillier Trek" for this?Everything is canon, except you have to translate the seriousness level and tone to explain how the sillier Treks are canon.
I,Mudd has a few silly moments. As do the Tribble episodes. I'm sure the Berman shows do too. Silly is canon.What are we calling a "sillier Trek" for this?
I know people will probably say Lower Decks, given that it's animated and a comedy, but "Spock's Brain" is sitting right there as TOS canon too. If that's canon, then everything else as silly as that episode has to be too.
Nah
Nah. This isn't a democracy. And if it was, fans wouldn't get a vote.
It's the only vote.IP ownership certainly isn’t the decisive vote no matter how much they wish it was.
That would make conversations very confusing.that I will overtly choose to ignore those Shows in any conversation about Canon.
IP ownership certainly isn’t the decisive vote no matter how much they wish it was.
That movie is still canon though, so I'm not sure what your point is?It's capitalism and the customers always get the final votes, especially in the age of streaming.
See Solo: A Star Wars Story![]()
"Spock's Brain" is sitting right there
I,Mudd has a few silly moments
Has it been decanonised because of its poor performance?It's capitalism and the customers always get the final votes, especially in the age of streaming.
See Solo: A Star Wars Story![]()
That...doesn't make it less canon.It's capitalism and the customers always get the final votes, especially in the age of streaming.
See Solo: A Star Wars Story![]()
It has. Lucas is personally going door to door in search of it to erase it from the archive record.Has it been decanonised because of its poor performance?
Spock's Brain.What are we calling a "sillier Trek" for this?
I know people will probably say Lower Decks, given that it's animated and a comedy, but "Spock's Brain" is sitting right there as TOS canon too. If that's canon, then everything else as silly as that episode has to be too.
That would make conversations very confusing.
I largely treat anything set after DS9 to be an unknown.
I repeat my statementI largely treat anything set after DS9 to be an unknown.
This is the equivalent of Catholics who don't accept Vatican II.I largely treat anything set after DS9 to be an unknown.
I would add the caveat that if something on screen is so bad everyone hates it, the fans consensus overrules it.
Even with that, there might be some wiggle room.
IP ownership certainly isn’t the decisive vote no matter how much they wish it was.
It's capitalism and the customers always get the final votes,
especially in the age of streaming.
See Solo: A Star Wars Story![]()
As far as I'm concerned, something released on screen as an official Star Trek series is canon, and always will be canon. No amount of fan hate can 'decanonize' it.
And (and this may be a more controversial opinion) in my view, neither can TPTB 'decanonize' earlier material simply because they don't happen to like it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.