Ahahaha! If you say, little boy. If you say.
Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard
- Thread starter pst
- Start date
WTF is your problem?
Ok, I appreciate you taking my side in all this, but lay off Dukhat. We've had a few arguments here and there but he's always been a respectful person, at least to me, and doesn't deserve that kinda treatment.
Yeah this is all getting a bit off the chain and immensely OT.
To be clear, I feel exactly the same way about you, and no hard feelings. I would like to get back to talking about starships instead of picking apart some guy who has a great ship website.
Huge piles of shit ----> mountain of a molehill.
I'm not better than anyone else. Nobody here is, so lets stop throwing stones in glass houses.
(reads current page and quietly puts my "I'm Infinitely Better Than You" t-shirt back in the closet)
Last edited:
because no one, including you, can exclude anyone.
[*Enters thread*]
Sigh.
[*Leaves thread*]
Sigh.
[*Leaves thread*]
You certainly missed a lot of points.
Okay, I'm going to have to note that I had considered locking this thread yesterday to give everyone a chance to cool off; but people seem to have gotten there themselves, and were cooling off...for eight hours. Posters coming in on the fracas late maybe need to read the room before kicking the hornet's nest.
To matters involving the thread title, this topic is not fresh, but I want to mention how I like the black highlights on 25th century successor ship classes in Star Trek Online. I do wish the Star Trek: Picard series had given us closer-up isolated views of the Reliant-class, Sutherland-class, and Gagarin-class.
These three cases especially appeal to me for being logistically written well in PIC in spite of how often STO ends up overusing related trademarks too close together (e.g. Talvath-class and R'Mor-class). The Reliant (NCC-1864) was destroyed in 2285, the Sutherland (NCC-72015) could easily have been retired since last appearing to the audience in 2374, and the Gagarin (NCC-1309) was destroyed in 2257, making 2401 a good time for these lead ships to be (relatively?) new off the drydocks.
These three cases especially appeal to me for being logistically written well in PIC in spite of how often STO ends up overusing related trademarks too close together (e.g. Talvath-class and R'Mor-class). The Reliant (NCC-1864) was destroyed in 2285, the Sutherland (NCC-72015) could easily have been retired since last appearing to the audience in 2374, and the Gagarin (NCC-1309) was destroyed in 2257, making 2401 a good time for these lead ships to be (relatively?) new off the drydocks.
Yeah, the dark patches are one of the few things I kinda don't mind from thr STO ships. They definitely saw the Sovereign class and went from there.To matters involving the thread title, this topic is not fresh, but I want to mention how I like the black highlights on 25th century successor ship classes in Star Trek Online. I do wish the Star Trek: Picard series had given us closer-up isolated views of the Reliant-class, Sutherland-class, and Gagarin-class.
These three cases especially appeal to me for being logistically written well in PIC in spite of how often STO ends up overusing related trademarks too close together (e.g. Talvath-class and R'Mor-class). The Reliant (NCC-1864) was destroyed in 2285, the Sutherland (NCC-72015) could easily have been retired since last appearing to the audience in 2374, and the Gagarin (NCC-1309) was destroyed in 2257, making 2401 a good time for these lead ships to be (relatively?) new off the drydocks.
On a side note... first time really taking a close look at the Sutherland class; that Bridge looks awfully tiny. Has it been in the pool?
Working in the 3d model. Its actually a decent size. Ship is just big.
We're looking at the only little boy in this conversation. Grow TF up and come back in a few years.
WTF ever gave you the idea THIS was an ok comment??
What I said here:
If people want to keep this going, they'll be the ones that I take action against at this point.
