Hopefully with more Captain Teva. Probably one of the more interesting characters, and finally not so irritating.Awesome to see them working together.
Hopefully they'll fold theplanned/cancelled "Rangers of the Republic" into Mando season 4.
Hopefully with more Captain Teva. Probably one of the more interesting characters, and finally not so irritating.Awesome to see them working together.
Hopefully they'll fold theplanned/cancelled "Rangers of the Republic" into Mando season 4.
Not only is it an option, it's better for your health!Is not caring whoever and however Palpatine is or was or whatever in The Rise of Skywalker an option? Because I choose that one.
Assuming that's allowed. At this time.
For me the predictability was kind of the problem. After TLJ it looked like they were deliberately going off the beaten track and actually trying something different . . . and then they just went the most derivative route possible.I believe so. I personally find Palaptine's return very predictable and inoffensive since it's been done before in books. I thought books were considered ok but perhaps I shouldn't any more.
I think we can thank angry fanboys for causing Disney to panic and go running back to the "safe" arms of J.J. Abrams instead of going with whatever Colin Trevorrow had in mind.For me the predictability was kind of the problem. After TLJ it looked like they were deliberately going off the beaten track and actually trying something different . . . and then they just went the most derivative route possible.
I'm not convinced that was even a factor. The box office and critical response to 'The Book of Henry' on the other hand might have played more of a role.I think we can thank angry fanboys for causing Disney to panic and go running back to the "safe" arms of J.J. Abrams instead of going with whatever Colin Trevorrow had in mind.
I'm sure that wasn't the main contributing factor but it certainly didn't help any.
I have the security camera footage.The way people reacted you'd think I just claimed to have broken into LF and secretly altered the holocron entry or something.
What does this even mean? Do you think Abrams controls the visual dictionary? Who is the guy that Lucas personally taught? Filoni? How likely is it that his work would even necessarily address this issue?For those blindly arguing in favour of following the footnotes of the sodding visual dictionary, ask yourself this; who do you think is going to have a greater impact of the greater mythical storytelling in this franchise? The guy that Lucas personally taught, and who respects his vision and the integrity of the world he created . . . or the notoriously shallow (storytelling-wise) director they hired twice because Disney imposed a deadline and they were desperate? And which of them is getting *more* involved in future storytelling, not less?
Didn't Trevorrow supposedly insist on having Luke alive for his film?I think we can thank angry fanboys for causing Disney to panic and go running back to the "safe" arms of J.J. Abrams instead of going with whatever Colin Trevorrow had in mind.
And here I thought you could recognise a Clawdite using a shadow hologram when you saw one. For shame!I have the security camera footage.
Look, I've sliced a couple of security systems it had your fingerprints all over it.And here I thought you could recognise a Clawdite using a shadow hologram when you saw one. For shame!
Also, I was nowhere near the place when I disabled the camera.
I will agree with that up to a certain point. Once I kind of went, "Oh, that's were they're going" then I accepted it and moved on. Again, it's not my favorite film nor is it the decisions that I would have made. But, if I am going to enjoy it, especially because of the characters I like, then I'm going to have to make peace with it.For me the predictability was kind of the problem. After TLJ it looked like they were deliberately going off the beaten track and actually trying something different . . . and then they just went the most derivative route possible.
I admit I'm not a fan of Trevorrow either (see: all of Jurassic World films, although at least Dominion was mostly fun). I'm just lamenting the impulse to run back to the beaten path of Abrams, although I agree he's a good director.I'm not convinced that was even a factor. The box office and critical response to 'The Book of Henry' on the other hand might have played more of a role.
Honestly I'm still not sure why he was sacked (though claims abound) but since I've not enjoyed a single movie he's either written or directed, I find it hard to fault the decision.
For all my problems with JJ's creative decisions, he's at least a competent director (and a legitimately nice person that the crew seem to like) so I understand why they went back to him to round off the trilogy.
Unfortunately, if I recall correctly, I believe that he difficulty meeting the deadlines of what the studio wanted. So, Kennedy went to someone who was reliable and could produce it on time and under budget, which Abrams is very good at doing.I admit I'm not a fan of Trevorrow either (see: all of Jurassic World films, although at least Dominion was mostly fun). I'm just lamenting the impulse to run back to the beaten path of Abrams, although I agree he's a good director.
I'm already imagining Mando's Naboo fighter flying alongside Teva's X-Wing as they fly off on adventures and I like this imagery.Hopefully with more Captain Teva.
It's kind of a pet peeve of mine when a story has a lot of potential and is *almost* good, but makes some key baffling and creatively bereft decisions, it just irks me. They had some good material, but it was material for like three other completely different movies and couldn't decide what to drop, so they just shoved it all in at once . . . and still somehow managed to waste most of the runtime on a pointless McGuffin hunt.I will agree with that up to a certain point. Once I kind of went, "Oh, that's were they're going" then I accepted it and moved on. Again, it's not my favorite film nor is it the decisions that I would have made. But, if I am going to enjoy it, especially because of the characters I like, then I'm going to have to make peace with it.
I didn't even bother with Dominion. JW for me felt like for the original movies what Force Awakens was for Star Wars, but done by someone that wasn't a very good director, and didn't understand what made the original work in the first place (so only half like TFA.) The thing with what happened to the PA rather typifies that.I admit I'm not a fan of Trevorrow either (see: all of Jurassic World films, although at least Dominion was mostly fun). I'm just lamenting the impulse to run back to the beaten path of Abrams, although I agree he's a good director.
All they need is a brand new T-70 in the squadron, and they'll have all three trilogies representing!I'm already imagining Mando's Naboo fighter flying alongside Teva's X-Wing as they fly off on adventures and I like this imagery.
So why was 'when Chewie died' the point where they lost you? At that point - thinking he was actually dead - you should have been suitably impressed by the nonzero stakes, something that happened and actually mattered, etc.Reverend said:I think the point where they lost me was when Chewie died, but when the REALLY lost me was that is was a fake-out. After that, I just couldn't engage or care, however much I might want to. Once you pull a stunt like that, you've basically told the audience that the stakes are at zero, and anything can be reversed, so nothing that happens actually matters.
The Palpatine reveal in the crawl faked out the audience? This makes no sense whatsoever. The other example of the movie playing takebacksies was Rey giving up the saber.Hell if you count the BS Palpatine reveal in the crawl, they did that THREE times in one movie!
I am shocked by it but my wife was glad for it.Also tRoS is the only Star Wars movie that made me feel like I just wasted 2 hours. I think the point where they lost me was when Chewie died, but when the REALLY lost me was that is was a fake-out. After that, I just couldn't engage or care, however much I might want to. Once you pull a stunt like that, you've basically told the audience that the stakes are at zero, and anything can be reversed, so nothing that happens actually matters. And sure enough, they later fake-kill Rey too, and I was utterly unmoved. Hell if you count the BS Palpatine reveal in the crawl, they did that THREE times in one movie! I'm honestly a little shocked they resisted the urge to bring Ben back to life too.
Now see, my opinion of the PT has gone up and down, but I was never not entertained, one way or the other. Same for TFA & TLJ. There are things I liked (mostly the characters & performances) and there are things I didn't, but I was never not engaged. tRoS is the only time I felt *nothing*, and that's a shame because I feel like the cast and crew deserved a better movie.And, I'll freely admit that TPM was the first experience in Star Wars that made me go, "What a waste." And I think that it was rectified by reading the novel, and really engaging with the ancillary material that helped me through that irritation that I had walking out of the theater.
And that's fair.I remember walking out of TPM shaking my head, even as a teen, and ROTS was disappointing. I found myself wanting it to be done. That's not what I'm looking for.Now see, my opinion of the PT has gone up and down, but I was never not entertained, one way or the other. Same for TFA & TLJ. There are things I liked (mostly the characters & performances) and there are things I didn't, but I was never not engaged. tRoS is the only time I felt *nothing*, and that's a shame because I feel like the cast and crew deserved a better movie.
I could have sworn I specifically said the words "head cannon".
Accurate.
Only thing the good captain needs is appropriate sandalsI'm already imagining Mando's Naboo fighter flying alongside Teva's X-Wing as they fly off on adventures and I like this imagery.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.