I think you may have missed a few points.
Spoilers Picard News & Reviews from Outside Sources
- Thread starter The Old Mixer
- Start date
I think you may have missed a few points.
No, I didn't miss anything. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they missed your point(s).
It may not just be my points you missed.
Ya know I have a limited amount of time in a day to talk all things Trek or what's been called Trek here. So I can't spend any more time in a verbal Kirk-Fu of vagueness and innuendo. But have fun with that. I'm headed back to the episode 10 thread so I can praise the finale and give credit to TM for crafting a beautiful and fulfilling final TNG movie.
Do Frakes and McFadden know something we don't? Their looks do betray something else might be brewing!
https://twitter.com/CineKompass/status/1649050294221774848
https://twitter.com/CineKompass/status/1649050294221774848
Considering Pat Stewarts hard-on, they indeed have something in store…
Great. They can toss out everything from Picard now. Except Picard himself though.
Indeed. The words have change but the intent is the same-people treated equality. Star Trek was trying that out, more or less successfully, long before the current struggles with terms of awakeness. And I welcome more equality not less.
Nope. It is the recognition that the status quo is deeply unequal on a systemic level.
Nope. Wokeness is the advocacy for true equality. Those who say otherwise merely embody the maxim that "When someone is accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."
The point being, of course, that you really can put words in whatever order you want.
Not even close. It's an unabashed attempt to force the ideology of the minority onto the majority by hijacking freedom of speech. It's an attempt to blame the majority for the failures of the minority. To abolish all personal responsibility and make the strong suffer for the weak and feckless. And the methods employed are so ugly and inequitable that it savagely violates the idea of unity and segregates society into two distinct categories with no more common ground to be had. 'Woke' ideas of equality are as deeply and tragically flawed as they are purposely disingenuous.
What ideology is that?
What minority is that?
What majority is that?
Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
Oh, really? What failures? Of what minority?
Oh, so you believe that some people are superior to others because they're "strong," huh?
Segregating society is what was already happening. Woke folks just call it like it is.
It doesn't appear so. There's nothing more rabidly obsessed than a liberal that's been exposed to a contrary point of view.
Please stop.
I did stop. Someone else restarted it. Take it up with them.
Your comment I quoted shows otherwise.
Let the record show that it was @LongHauler who brought up the question of "wokeness" for no real reason in this post:
Prior to this post, the topic had been whether or not a television series entitled Star Trek by the owners of the Star Trek intellectual property was "really" Star Trek.
Prior to this post, the topic had been whether or not a television series entitled Star Trek by the owners of the Star Trek intellectual property was "really" Star Trek.
Alright, the discussion of wokeness ends now. And I don't care what side of it you're on.
Note especially @LongHauler , @Sci
Note especially @LongHauler , @Sci
Oh this might be fun.
Let the record show that it was @Racefuel who wrote the following:
To which, I replied...
And that was the end of it. Or it could have been. Until a certain someone that got butthurt by the audacity of another human being not subscribing to his narrow, hate-filled world view.
Let the record show that it was @Racefuel who wrote the following:
To which, I replied...
And that was the end of it. Or it could have been. Until a certain someone that got butthurt by the audacity of another human being not subscribing to his narrow, hate-filled world view.
Similar threads
