The anti-anti-NuTrek people that oppose PICARD season 3, because the anti-NuTrek people like it or because it is too close to Berman-era
Wouldn't anti-anti-NuTrek be PRO-NuTrek?

The anti-anti-NuTrek people that oppose PICARD season 3, because the anti-NuTrek people like it or because it is too close to Berman-era
Oh shit, don't tell me the YouTubers will do a special on me?! (10 Quatloos if you get the reference.)What? There’s no way something like that is allowed. I will protest vehemently, most vehemently to the Council of YouTube Insiders. There WILL be consequences. Mark my words.![]()
We'd have to have one season first...Does one season of Picard justify a campaign to make Terry Matalas showrunner for Star Trek?
Oh shit, don't tell me the YouTubers will do a special on me?! (10 Quatloos if you get the reference.)
Right. I've got to be anti something. Hmm. Can't just like and dislike according to my whims. Got it!
Check your account for a deposit of 10 Quatloos!Well, the folks at home will enjoy the special, in living colour. Plus, we’ll reserve a ten-minute spot for a short film on the latest generation of the Jupiter 8, brought to you by one of our proud sponsors. Now available in both gasoline and EV drivetrains.![]()
Check your account for a deposit of 10 Quatloos!
We'd have to have one season first...
Indeed. Petitions are silly. I have even signed it and I’m friends with Terry.Agreed, the petition is irrelevant. It all comes down to the viewing data which only P+ has. If Picard S3 did very well, he'll be back most likely.
Yes. It's very different than the differences over say ENT. Probably because it bleeds much more into real life.I think he's talking about the divisions as they currently are.
I'd hope so. I try and engage in good faith when I stop by. Unfortunately I've had to use the ignore button more than once on others who have personally attacked me.Can't we all just get along?
This is much more over on Planet Twitter. Anti-anti-NuTrek are the people that are so Pro-NuTrek that they are turned off by anti-NuTrek people that like PICARD season 3. So they don't like PICARD season 3 because people they don't like -- like it. Again, Twitter tribalism...Wouldn't anti-anti-NuTrek be PRO-NuTrek?![]()
Indeed. Petitions are silly. I have even signed it and I’m friends with Terry.
This is much more over on Planet Twitter. Anti-anti-NuTrek are the people that are so Pro-NuTrek that they are turned off by anti-NuTrek people that like PICARD season 3. So they don't like PICARD season 3 because people they don't like -- like it. Again, Twitter tribalism...
It's coming from people more connected to the situation then yourself.
Enough projecting
You asked a question you knew the answer to, just to have a circular argument.
Instead of me playing along, Mike and Rich's commentary on Kurtzman Trek on this is far more entertaining.
That's according to your own limited perspective. RMB, Popcast, Cullen, Critical Drinker and the others were given the episodes way in advance and were actually informed about all of this.
And they are still in contact with Terry,Chris and all the others, with interviews coming up.
Kurtzman stepped off to do "Man Who Fell to Earth" and had no creative input on Pic S3, according to them. Terry Matalas was given the budget (a limited one) and full creative control of the season.
Hyperbole, thy name is Fireproof78.
If you're actually so concerned with the divisiveness here, you wouldn't make such silly exaggerated statements as above.
Even under the guise of jest.
I'm debating whether I should reply ban you from your own thread, or just close the damn thing.Well continue to bury your head in the sand all you want then.
Until you prove you have a better track record than these guys, who are actually in contact with the production and have proven it, you've got nothing.
That's unfortunate to hear. You seem to be a supporter of Terry, but a fairly reasonable one as far as I can tell.I'd hope so. I try and engage in good faith when I stop by. Unfortunately I've had to use the ignore button more than once on others who have personally attacked me.
Probably because it bleeds much more into real life.
Might be wise to leave it to Twitter then. Sounds nonsensical, like "May that be your last Battlefield " level.This is much more over on Planet Twitter. Anti-anti-NuTrek are the people that are so Pro-NuTrek that they are turned off by anti-NuTrek people that like PICARD season 3. So they don't like PICARD season 3 because people they don't like -- like it. Again, Twitter tribalism...
I think they've stonewalled themselves in. DS9 went from "the Star Trek series that was different from the norm" to "the Star Trek series that should be the norm!" And once you think Star Trek should be one way and one way only, you get stuck.Well, if they hold DS9 up on a pedestal, I'm with them on that!
But there's certainly be tons of great Trek both before and after that timeframe.
I don't fault him for that either. In fact, in general, I believe it's good thing to meet with your critics and hash things out. A lot of people simply aren't brave enough to do that. So, kudos for him for taking that approach.I think they've stonewalled themselves in. DS9 went from "the Star Trek series that was different from the norm" to "the Star Trek series that should be the norm!" And once you think Star Trek should be one way and one way only, you get stuck.
To be honest, I don't fault Terry Matalas for reaching out to people who don't like the rest of New Trek. He wants people who normally wouldn't give another season of Picard the light of day to check out his season.
I can even understand the motivation behind Terry-Trekkers putting out this petition. Between DSC and PIC, I'll have had 95 episodes of what I wanted. Over a span of seven years (2017-2024). I'm all set after this. I'll have had my turn. I consider anything beyond it to be "extra". I'm prepared to let the Star Trek ship sail without me. But them? They've only had 10 episodes of what they want and are hungry for more. So I can understand them wanting more.
Sorry, I wish I could do an analogy but those are so culturally specific. Some people don't like something because other people are supporting it.I'm confused ...![]()
Haha I came back to NuTrek because Terry was involved in season 2That's unfortunate to hear. You seem to be a supporter of Terry, but a fairly reasonable one as far as I can tell.
Well, you do get direct access to most of the writing staff and actors, so it's worth a lurk...Might be wise to leave it to Twitter then. Sounds nonsensical, like "May that be your last Battlefield " level.
And, the elephant in the room is time marching on. Certain things possible now just might not be possible in 5-10 years.I can even understand the motivation behind Terry-Trekkers putting out this petition. Between DSC and PIC, I'll have had 95 episodes of what I wanted. Over a span of seven years (2017-2024). I'm all set after this. I'll have had my turn. I consider anything beyond it to be "extra". I'm prepared to let the Star Trek ship sail without me. But them? They've only had 10 episodes of what they want and are hungry for more. So I can understand them wanting more.
Especially on a live stream! And some YouTubers DON'T LIKE DISCO... but they have great interviews with other writers and actors. Worth a watch... and it shows how much care and attention to detail they put into the season.I don't fault him for that either. In fact, in general, I believe it's good thing to meet with your critics and hash things out. A lot of people simply aren't brave enough to do that. So, kudos for him for taking that approach.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.