• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Starfleet Museum

What ships will we see in the Starfleet Museum?


  • Total voters
    89
Yeah, that is absolutely a TOS Connie. There is nothing else it could be.

only question is which one. Cant be Enterprise, Defiant or the one destroyed by the space amoeba.
A lot of Vanguard readers would be happy if it was the Endeavour.
 
. Cant be Enterprise, Defiant or the one destroyed by the space amoeba.
My guesses - Yorktown (Because that was the original name in the original 1960's pitch by Roddenberry), Intrepid (Because why not), or the Constitution itself to name check the class.
 
https://www.starfleet-museum.org/
See every single one in there! :techman:

It certainly looks.. original connie ish..
there were 12 in the fleet, surely not ALL of them meet with a dastardly end.. and not refit..
The only thing I remember reading (non-canon of course) is in FASA's games, the Enterprise was the only one to return from the initial run of Connies, with others built before the refit. However, that's not on screen, so I'm thinking we'll at least see one of those original 12 (maybe Constitution herself) alongside the 1701-A as the earliest surviving Connie class Enterprise.
 
does the space dock seem.. small?
I doubt an excelsior class could get out the doors.. seems small.

Geordi has slowly refit the NX to todays standards, but still looking like a 22nd century ship.. she can go toe to toe with an inquiry class now.. :razz:
 
Last edited:
does the space dock seem.. small?
I doubt an excelsior class could get out the doors.. seems small.

I almost don't want to say it, but the scales seem different. Those Connie's look rather large when compared to the Constellation, Intrepid and Akira. Could we be getting the larger scale from SNW, while retaining a retro look?
 
I've always preferred the 400 meter range, that's the only way to fit the set heights in the ship. That's the length Doug Drexler used for his Connie cutaway if you measure the people (even if he still says the ship is 289m)
 
I've always preferred the 400 meter range, that's the only way to fit the set heights in the ship. That's the length Doug Drexler used for his Connie cutaway if you measure the people (even if he still says the ship is 289m)
Agreed. I see absolutely no problem with the Enterprise being 442m. It solves every single size issue with the ship and still looks fine on a size chart when you compare it to other ships.

*What I would love for them to do is fix the scaling issues with the Excelsior. She's always been listed as WAY too small.
 
Last edited:
Agreed. I see absolutely no problem with the Enterprise being 442m. It solves every single size issue with the ship and still looks fine on a size chart when you compare it to other ships.

*What I would love for them to do is fix the scaling issues with the Excelsior. She's always been listed as WAY too small.

I’m also fine with the TOS/TMP Connies being larger, along with the other TMP-era ships such as the Excelsior, Reliant and Grissom. I think back in the day of TNG they purposely made those ship scales smaller to emphasize how large the Galaxy class was, and it just stuck for the next 30-odd years.

The only thing that annoys me, Starfleet ship scale-wise, is how much longer the Crossfield class is in relation to the Galaxy class, because of those ridiculous and unnecessarily-long nacelles they gave it, which wasn’t part of the original design.
 
which wasn’t part of the original design.
Yeah, they were added so late in production, some of the early Season 1 episodes still have the short nacelles on the bridge consoles.

I believe the concept art with the long nacelles was dated December 2016. 1 month before filming and 9 months before airing. Though that doesn't explain why the official key art a couple months before airing still used the short nacelles.

Edit: yep
0AdptoO.png
 
Last edited:
In "Relics," Picard said that there was a Constitution class in the fleet museum; and the implication was that it was a TOS-configuration ship, as he was recognizing it by its bridge.
Good catch! I'd forgotten he said that. I guess they edited out the part where he said "Oh, there's also the NCC-1701-Bloody A as well."
 
The only thing that annoys me, Starfleet ship scale-wise, is how much longer the Crossfield class is in relation to the Galaxy class, because of those ridiculous and unnecessarily-long nacelles they gave it, which wasn’t part of the original design.
The Crossfield class is a poor design. Best left at a museum.
 
The Crossfield class is a poor design. Best left at a museum.

Actually, the design itself would have been just fine for a ship built post-TUC/pre-TNG. The original design was based on Ralph McQuarrie’s Planet of the Titans Enterprise, which was a post-TOS design. The study models for that ship actually showed up both in STIII and TNG’s “Unification.”
 
Actually, the design itself would have been just fine for a ship built post-TUC/pre-TNG. The original design was based on Ralph McQuarrie’s Planet of the Titans Enterprise, which was a post-TOS design. The study models for that ship actually showed up both in STIII and TNG’s “Unification.”
I'm aware of the history.

I stand by my opinion.
 
With the exception of the oddly long Nacelles, I kinda dig it. It has very basic shapes and hull lines that I think make it a pretty good contemporary to the Constitution. I especially like sphere in the middle of the disk.
Everyone of course as their aesthetic preferences. I recall looking at the concept art for the design. I tried really hard to like it because, as you say, it could work as a contemporary of the Constitution. But the shapes just...suck.

Again, it belongs in a museum.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top