T’Pol didn’t go to the academy either and she was given a field commission of commander. Seven has had far more years serving on a Starfleet vessel to be able to earn a commission.
It absolutely feels that way. No joy in viewing a show; just nitpicking and finding fault.Does anyone thing fans are being even more nitpicky than usual? Even for Star Trek fan standards it's ridiculous.
Every week there's hundreds of posts complaining about the year, the age of characters, the plausibility of technology. Every throwaway line is analysed to the Nth degree against almighty Canon.
This week it's "how could Jack Crusher POSSIBLY be in a bar aged 18” for Christ's sake.
Are people so unimaginative that they need everything explained to them with diagrams before they'll get it go? I've always been able to fill in the gaps for myself quite happily. Others just poke the holes but can't think around it for themselves.
I know I shouldn't be surprised, but even when the showrunners try to engage and explain their thinking, that just opens up a whole slew of new nitpicks. I don't know how Terry copes with being on Twitter!
10 forward is a bar in LA
On forward street
Because the writers didn't watch tng and think that's how Easter eggs work
People on reddit claim that subtitles spoiled (didn't see this myself despite also watching on subtitles)
Jack hearing the Borg queen apparently.
One small group. Borg still exist in some way, regardless of Janeway's efforts.Or they are just one small group? Is there still original mean Borg?
Older Worf with his hair down.
![]()
T’Pol didn’t go to the academy either and she was given a field commission of commander. Seven has had far more years serving on a Starfleet vessel to be able to earn a commission.
Does anyone think fans are being even more nitpicky than usual? Even for Star Trek fan standards it's ridiculous.
Kelvin Kirk was listed as lieutenant, so his rank was lieutenant, and he was a cadet under instruction, similarly to SaavikKelvin Kirk becomes Captain as a cadet. So does Tilly, though acting.
When us "Older" Trek fans nitpick, it almost always involves finding creative ways to make what we've been presented with "FIT" into canon, not decry that the Producers don't give a damn.Or -and just hear me out- or, maybe you're viewing the nitpicking Trek fans of old through the very same rose-tinted antique time-travelling spectacles that today's nitpickers accuse the less nitpicky fans of viewing past Treks through.![]()
When us "Older" Trek fans nitpick, it almost always involves finding creative ways to make what we've been presented with "FIT" into canon, not decry that the Producers don't give a damn.
That is a Hell of a lot more fun, than just tossing ones hands up in the air and figuratively walking away shaking ones head in disgust.
Not in my experience. In the past, and even with older Trek, efforts were made, head canon designed, to make things fit. As @DaveyNY notes it is to be creative to fit things together. It is to treat it as a big continuity, and to play inside the sandbox, despite inconsistencies.Or -and just hear me out- or, maybe you're viewing the nitpicking Trek fans of old through the very same rose-tinted antique time-travelling spectacles that today's nitpickers accuse the less nitpicky fans of viewing past Treks through.![]()
It's more than that. It's angry, and defensive, and very "black and white" thinking of what makes Star Trek Star Trek. There's no effort to make it fit; just a measure stick to beat the production team about the head and rub their noses in mistakes. It isn't accepting; it's "us vs. them."That is a Hell of a lot more fun, than just tossing ones hands up in the air and figuratively walking away shaking ones head in disgust.
The latter is not being a "Fan", it's being a bitch and has no intrinsic value.
Not in my experience. In the past, and even with older Trek, efforts were made, head canon designed, to make things fit. As @DaveyNY notes it is to be creative to fit things together. It is to treat it as a big continuity, and to play inside the sandbox, despite inconsistencies.
It was, in a word, fun...
It's more than that. It's angry, and defensive, and very "black and white" thinking of what makes Star Trek Star Trek. There's no effort to make it fit; just a measure stick to beat the production team about the head and rub their noses in mistakes. It isn't accepting; it's "us vs. them."
I saw it. And laughed, I cried and it moved me.See above reply...![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.