And? What are you arguing against? Nowhere have I said "7 years of Maquis/Starfleet conflict. " so I'm not sure what's being argued here.Look, how long was the Fleeter/Maquis thing SUPPOSED to last? The entire run of the series is just ridiculous.
Eventually it had to 100% end. Just like Sisko's conflict with Kira and Odo.
Heck, let's look at modern stuff. How long did Gamora and Nebula's conflict with each other last in the Guardians of the Galaxy movies?
And? What are you arguing against? Nowhere have I said "7 years of Maquis/Starfleet conflict. " so I'm not sure what's being argued here.
One.I'm just asking when is enough enough? DS9 resolved it's major internal conflicts in 1 season, so how long was VOY supposed to run on Fleeter vs Maquis? Just how many seasons were we expected to see them butting heads before it became annoying and outstayed its welcome?
One.
One season would have been sufficient for me with the butting of heads from time to time between the Maquis and Starfleet crews. One episode really wasn't enough. I don't think we needed a mutiny or anything but you'd think that the two crews would have been a bit more at odds since the Maquis were branded "terrorists." UPN didn't want that kind of strife though. Their tag line was "One Ship. One Crew." if I recall correctly in many of the promos they ran for the show.
Yes.Would it be acceptable THEN that they finally decide to start working together as a functional group?
The crew didn't need to literally have knives at each other's throats. But a difference of opinion or differing strategies to the issues they faced, forcing both crew's to learn from and trust each other over the course of that first season, wouldn't have been out of line.Massive hyperbole.
Basically, the Maquis consisted of...
* A person who had the sort of ruthlessness you'd expect a Maquis to have... but was a Cardassian agent.
My theory is that they were taken into custody upon Voyager's return to the Alpha Quadrant and tried for several crimes, including mass murder and violation of the Prime Directive. They received a degree of clemency because of the extreme circumstances, but probably spent at least some time in the New Zealand penal colony.I have also wondered how they fared when they got back home. Were they tried for what happened on the Equinox? Was Janeway a voice of leniency for them? I imagine they were likely kicked out of Starfleet, but you never know.
Imagine if they'd done "Worst Case Scenario" but for real and in the first season, maybe as the finale? The thing is, how do you come back from that? Or could Chakotay do it in a way that's against Janeway but not against the ship itself? But could she ever forgive him?
I agree. I'd started thinking that in a version of Voyager that had more continuity a coup arc like WCS would have been inevitable and dramatically interesting for writers but now I think it would have been a mistake. I think they might have gotten away with it if say Seska or even a new prominent Maquis character was still on the ship and had rebelled with a bunch of Maquis and a bunch of Starfleet. Maybe they do a version of "Prime Factors" that would get them home but kill a bunch of people in the long run. They know the coup won't last but it only needs to last until they get everyone back to the Alpha Quadrant. Then once it's foiled they could deal with the conspirators or maybe they go on the run and that's how you get Seska. Again I don't know if this works or would have been good.The problem is that...well, you can't come back from that sort of thing. In Babylon 5, when Garibaldi betrayed Sheridan they had to have it be revealed he'd been brainwashed into doing that because the writers realized it would be the end of his character in the show if he did it honestly.
NuBSG, they killed off most of the conspirators who helped the Cylons and when one of the actually important characters did this they had to contrive him being a secret spy for the good side so they'd spare him.
With VOY there'd be no way to really justify the Fleeters not just getting rid of the Maquis if they pulled this. That's why Seska had to be revealed as a Cardassian Agent.
I agree. I'd started thinking that in a version of Voyager that had more continuity a coup arc like WCS would have been inevitable and dramatically interesting for writers but now I think it would have been a mistake. I think they might have gotten away with it if say Seska or even a new prominent Maquis character was still on the ship and had rebelled with a bunch of Maquis and a bunch of Starfleet. Maybe they do a version of "Prime Factors" that would get them home but kill a bunch of people in the long run. They know the coup won't last but it only needs to last until they get everyone back to the Alpha Quadrant. Then once it's foiled they could deal with the conspirators or maybe they go on the run and that's how you get Seska. Again I don't know if this works or would have been good.
I do like the idea that if you take a chunk of Voyager's crew away you're going to need to replace it and then I think it would be interesting if Voyager had started a recruitment drive or regularly picked up strays along the way to be civilian crew members. Once I started thinking about it made me wonder what Voyager would look like when it arrived in the Alpha Quadrant after seventy years and all the original crew had died from different horrible disasters and it's just Ensign Kim and a bunch of aliens.
Yes, why didn't Janeway use that knowledge?I mean heck, Kirk and Picard both had the same "Trapped far away" plot happen to them and they always resolved it within 1 episode.
Yes, why didn't Janeway use that knowledge?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.