Did I see that correctly? A building gets imploded, sucked up, then dumped on a city and ONLY 118 people die?
When you can fix just about anything by running a light over it...
Did I see that correctly? A building gets imploded, sucked up, then dumped on a city and ONLY 118 people die?
I believe Matalas has confirmed it's the 250th anniversary of the maiden flight of the NX-01, not the Federation.
Memory Alpha jumped the gun and labeled everything 2411. I get why they did so, though I would have held off for more context. It's been confirmed to be what @eschaton says above - so they had to jump back into all those pages and rewrite them to 2401. By then, the 2411 news had spread.
I get the impression M'Talas Prime is the smuggling / black market hub for the Federation core systems.Plus this might not be the most heavily populated planet. M'talas Prime might not have teeming cities and spaceports.
Not necessarilly, most of the victims could've been the ones who had the building fall on them.The city was empty, too?
If it's 2401 and not 2411 then why does Raffi's granddaughter look like a 10-year-old child and not like a 12-24-month-old toddler?
Raffi's daughter-in-law was pregnant in 2399.
2399:
![]()
2401: How?
![]()
Oh boo fucking hoo. Swearing is a normal part of language.but laments the... swearing.
Look at the Oklahoma City Bombing, 168 dead, 680 injured.How many were killed when the United Earth Embassy on Vulcan was bombed in 2154? 43, including Admiral Forrest? Trek has a history of blowing up large buildings in populated areas and keeping the death tolls fairly small.
That was the intent according to Michael Dorn and Terry.He reminds me of Pai Mei from Kill Bill.
Indeed, I actually noticed that this time. It had a very roughly rendered quality to it. I mean, it doesn't necessarily bother me, because it's not real in the first place, but it was noticeable.I'll be honest, the ships and their interactions in this episode felt off. The graphics definitely felt lower quality.
I don't think that's the case at all.haw's change of heart at the end of the episode bothers me because it was already established that Jack was Beverly's son. But suddenly when he's Picard's son it's more important to keep him safe. Is this show as "empowering" to Beverly's character as the showrunners were hyping? Because it doesn't feel like it so far, and her having an action scene to supposedly show otherwise now feels like a gimmick.
Matalas said on Trekmovie that S3 is the 250th anniversary of Enterprise NX-01's launch in April. That means S2 had to have taken place in January 2401, and only 3 months have passed. It's already been discussed endlessly here and on reddit how implausible Seven's a first officer already cracking under Shaw in 3 months, how Picard was a chancellor 3 months ago and suddenly isn't, Raffi's sudden change in job and emotional stability etc. in 3 months, the absurdity of harvesting wine in January, etc. But it comes from Matalas himself, so there it is.Where was Beverly in the "two weeks ago" flashback?
Season 2 was in 2401 (Picard's wine bottles) and Matalas had previously said season 3 takes place a few years later. Are we now thinking seasons 2 and 3 take place in the same year?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.