FX Break Down for the Titan in spacedock
https://twitter.com/shawnvfx/status/1626752770866020352
https://twitter.com/shawnvfx/status/1626752770866020352
And the point is missed.They don't have a leader.
All the Drones, and all the Queens are the same person.
Hey, needs of the many as some Vulcan once said! Who cares about a ship when you save billions? lol
Here's my thing though... Shaw's a fictional character completely controlled by the writing staff. Presumably they want us to hate him, because they're making it so obvious that they might as well show us that he spends his off-time in the holodeck dressed up as a Nazi, but I just don't get why. lol
Like if it's because Shaw's like Sisko and he hates Picard, then fine. At least with Brooks and how Sisko was written at that point, I totally get why he disrespects Picard the one time they meet each other. But the characterization of Shaw and his actual actions in this episode are just confusing to me.
He's either smart because he suspects them for having ulterior motives, or he's an idiot who somehow failed upwards into command of a C-tier ship that even Mariner wouldn't want to serve on... or is he both?
And the point is missed.
Except ... only in the sense of being subsumed into a collective mind against one's will.
It's been pretty explicit for decades that an individual assimilated into the Borg is the equivalent of a rape victim.
FX Break Down for the Titan in spacedock
https://twitter.com/shawnvfx/status/1626752770866020352
Trekyards speculated that maybe it's the 24th century equivalent between civilian and military spec weapons in the United States, where civilians might be able to obtain a phaser rifle, but it's not "automatic" and might be semi-auto with the pump action and limited power packs.That was pretty good.
The boarding of the Titan sequence was very nicely done. Really felt like Star Trek.
Minus one point for Beverly using a pump-action phaser rifle. That’s pretty dumb.
9
Then why they heck would they write him going to sleep right after?
If he really cared, he'd presumably keep an eye on them, especially since he hates Seven and presumably doesn't trust her either.
I'm only a quarter of the way in but isn't there a bit of a contradiction in saying "I am not a man who needs a legacy" mere minutes after talking about writing your memoirs?
Some interesting discussion here about Seven of Nine's name. I've always disdained that name, and do see it as an imposed designation. However, I do understand that is Seven's preferred identifier, so if I knew her in real life, I would respect her choice. I'd say, as opposed to a trans dead name allegory, she is shown to not consider it dead per se, or at least she didn't. I got the impression that she let B'Jayzl (or whatever her name was) call her "Annika" so her birth name was more an intimate name than a dead name. It may have "died" when she found out the one person she let in to her heart in that way ended up murdering her beloved child.
My issue is if he presumably dislikes Seven on a personal level and doesn't trust her on a professional level, having to remind her to remember where her loyalties lie...
Never said that.
These notions that the current team behind trek, are some how evil, machivellian schemers out to do harm and rip people off is bizarre and unhealthy.
Chabon would probably still get residuals given that he was one of the creators of the series. Also the series is still using Raffi and Laris so he'd get residuals from those characters regardless of much or little they are used.
The simple truth is that Matalas wanted all of the TNG crew cast back. Bringing on board Todd Stashwick and Ed Speelers would not have been cheap either. There was no room in the budget or in the story matalas envisioned for any of the original Picard characters other than Raffi and Laris.
To me, Shaw forcing Seven of Nine to answer to a name she never really had for most of her life and has trouble identifying with would be the equivalent of Picard having forced Worf to answer to "Lt. Rozhenko" aboard the Enterprise (since, arguably, Rozhenko is Worf's adopted last name given that Alexander carries it).
It's a level of personal insensitivity that you would expect a progressive society like the Federation to not allow among their officials and organizations.
Also, the Borg (or at least a segment of the Borg), are members of the Federation now, guarding the portal in space that opened at the end of season 2. So the idea that Borg designations aren't real names doesn't fly, since if the Borg are Federation members their "culture" and the norms of that culture would be just as valid as any others.
Shaw strikes me as a very solid, reliable captain (They wouldn't have given him a ship with a legacy if Stafleet didn't find him competent). Its also hinted in the 5 years since he took command of his ship he's kept them safe, likely without much in the way of casualties or issues. Unlike Picard, Riker or Seven he obviously follows orders and enjoys the structure of ship/starfleet life.
To Shaw, Riker and Picard are rogue elements, to him Picard likely is his own version of a Badmiral, especially when he tries to take his ship to god knows where, using the Titan's old captain to try and do so.
I mean, Shaw quite literally lists half of the things Picard and Riker got up to during the TNG days and it's an utter disaster when listed. Between them they destroyed the Enterprise D, embarked in numerous escapades that were against orders, disobeyed orders on multiple occassions and nearly sparked several border conflicts and wars through their actions.
Anywhere else, they'd have been drummed out even if "their heart was in the right place". Instead, one was promoted to Admiral and gets hero-worshipped and the other got command of his own ship and also enjoys hero worship, even if he never made the Admiralty.
It's way better done on screen and in character/in universe than Admiral Clancy spitting out "Sheer fucking hubris" at him in a scene which lasts under 3 minutes in which she doesn't do any real dialogue rather than "OMG WE SWEAR IN TREK NOW!" like in Season 1.
The question is, though, is how much of the events of Generations through Nemesis are common knowledge in the Fleet? We (the audience) know Picard saved the galaxy multiple times and destroyed his ship every outing, but how much is classified or considered heresay amongst the Fleet captains? I suppose since the events of First Contact would've been nearly 30 years ago, most of the events surrounding the Battle of Sector 001 were probably classified and swept under the rug by the Department of Temporal Investigations.
Shaw would've been probably a teenager hearing about Picard's exploits. Also, since the TNG movies were more action-oriented, in-universe Picard would have probably developed a cowboy reputation for going in guns blazing, which would have had an affect on Shaw's impression of Picard. Going through the Academy, moving up through the ranks, it's also possible Shaw despises what older Picard and co. stood for and wants to run his ship more on rules and diplomacy.
My personal justification for the stupid pump-action phaser is that it was old and faulty. In my mind, normally you have to pump it once to activate it and that's all but because it no longer works properly Beverly has to prime it before every shot, and the power cell is almost completely run down.Trekyards speculated that maybe it's the 24th century equivalent between civilian and military spec weapons in the United States, where civilians might be able to obtain a phaser rifle, but it's not "automatic" and might be semi-auto with the pump action and limited power packs.
The flashlight he held reminded me of the time he investigated the Amargosa Observatory in GEN. More than three decades later Will's still got the touch.
Even if the "Borg Commonwealth" was not fully a member, or just provisionally in the process, their position would arguably be the equivalent of Bajor during the events of Deep Space Nine.I mean, Picard was willing to start the bureaucratic process on the Jurati Borg spin-off (let's call them the Borg Commonwealth just so we have something to call them separate from the Collective) applying for Membership. That doesn't mean that they're Members yet, or that their application has been accepted or rejected.
And I could plausibly imagine the Federation pushing back on using Borg names during the period between 2378 and 2399, and that those bureaucratic barriers to XBs using their Bog names not yet being fully dismantled as of whenever this season is set. It would be inconsistent with Federation values, but clearly the Federation has its biases and blind spots even when it represents real and meaningful progress over real-life issues.
Even if the "Borg Commonwealth" was not fully a member, or just provisionally in the process, their position would arguably be the equivalent of Bajor during the events of Deep Space Nine.
Would it ever be conceivable that a Starfleet captain would tell a Bajoran that their preferred name wasn't valid? Ensign Ro has that specific conversation with Picard when coming onto the Enterprise about how to address her and that family/surname comes first in Bajoran culture.
Her choice. She was "Seven of Nine" since she was a child.20 years later and she still uses a Borg Designation.
It's way better done on screen and in character/in universe than Admiral Clancy spitting out "Sheer fucking hubris" at him in a scene which lasts under 3 minutes in which she doesn't do any real dialogue rather than "OMG WE SWEAR IN TREK NOW!" like in Season 1.
I'd place it in 2401 as all the Frontier Day posters on Earth say "Celebrating 250 Years..." and if that's in reference to the first Earth Starship launched to explore the Frontier; that would be the NX-01 in 2151.
2151+250 = 2401.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.