Yup.or is he both?
Yup.or is he both?
Here's my thing though... Shaw's a fictional character completely controlled by the writing staff. Presumably they want us to hate him, because they're making it so obvious that they might as well show us that he spends his off-time in the holodeck dressed up as a Nazi, but I just don't get why. lol
Like if it's because Shaw's like Sisko and he hates Picard, then fine. At least with Brooks and how Sisko was written at that point, I totally get why he disrespects Picard the one time they meet each other. But the characterization of Shaw and his actual actions in this episode are just confusing to me.
He's either smart because he suspects them for having ulterior motives, or he's an idiot who somehow failed upwards into command or a C-tier ship that even Mariner wouldn't want to serve on... or is he both?
I really want season 3 to be both good and successful. Its greatest challenge will be getting people that bailed over the course of NuTrek to come back and give this a chance. RLM has almost 1.5 million subs on YouTube. Their past Star Trek videos can gain over a million views. So getting them to even watch an episode after saying they were done is a big big deal for viral marketing.
I was actually on the edge of my seat watching their review. They didn't... dislike... the episode, and will be open to reviewing more episodes. I can see why they're so skeptical... season 2 did start well and fell off a cliff. They just don't seem to appreciate all the behind the scenes changes that have happened. And I really wish they'd gotten screener access. But, their foot is in the door, and their interest has been sparked... so I'd call it a win.
Meanwhile the Critical Drinker (1.6 million subs) has already seen the first six episodes and has given it a positive review.
Paramount is apparently looking for the season to have a presence on social media, so having the two largest YouTube channels that have (critically) covered Star Trek in the past be happy with it is a major accomplishment.
Human beings really shouldn't be put in charge of starships.Yup.
I don't know about the spoilers, but I could buy that. But if I hated someone and met them for the first time, my first instinct wouldn't be to go to sleep. Maybe that's just me. lolI mean if the spoilers some have posted are true, Shaw is kinda of what Sisko might have become if hadn't worked through the trauma of Jennifer's death while communicating with the Prophets. Just a bitter, grumpy, pissy man who keeps to himself most of the time.
Human beings really shouldn't be put in charge of starships.
I don't know about the spoilers, but I could buy that. But if I hated someone and met them for the first time, my first instinct wouldn't be to go to sleep. Maybe that's just me. lol
He got sleepy on the wine and Romulan brisket.
Nope. But, we're all we got.Human beings really shouldn't be put in charge of starships.![]()
The most commonly used launch date for the Ent-D I see online is 2363. The Neutral Zone being in 2364 could work if apply Lower Deck's stardate system, where 1000 stardates does not equal exactly one year.
My issue is if he presumably dislikes Seven on a personal level and doesn't trust her on a professional level, having to remind her to remember where her loyalties lie... and he's supposed to be a hardass captain that's all about the numbers and doing things by the book, the writers could have found a way to have him unable to interfere that wasn't him literally taking his eyes off the ball.What's your issue? I mean he goes to bed at some point but Shaw left the room not because he was tired but because he very obviously couldn't stand being in the presence of both Picard and Riker. It's perfectly normal behaviour to not want to spend time with people you dislike.
Would you like them in a house?I know green meat would make me excuse myself from the table before the meal ended.
And even less need to call someone a jerk.No need to be a jerk.
Or a ninny.Why are you being such a ninny.
Wait a minute, why is the quote showing as my post? I'm confused.It doesn't have to be either-or. He might be a generally competent captain who's got a blind spot/trauma response he's never bothered to work through and is making it everyone else's problem.
Wait a minute, why is the quote showing as my post? I'm confused.
ouch! It wouldn’t be the first time this kind of thing happens that that would really suck.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.