So it was, my memory-Alpha foo was failing me. It would only give me the ship from TOS lol
Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard
- Thread starter pst
- Start date
Looked like the Voyager concept model.
So I say after 3 beers and a highball....
Indeed. They could probably restart the line on the ships sown in PIC S3 alone. Here's hoping MR does a well-enough job with a limited license to handle the legacy EM stock, they'll be given a full license to produce new things going forward. Probably take a year or two to square away the legal details, sadly. Going to be a long wait either way...
Seems like a mixup with Shuttle 03.
Based on the ventral view of the original model of the Shangri La that Bill built, there are two shuttered openings labeled "1" and "2" underneath the fantail. I would have personally numbered the main bay "1" and the others "2" and "3", but I didn't build it, so...
Last edited:
Those feel more like cargo bays, unless they've started dropping shuttlepods out like the NX-01 did. No decent underside shots of the Titan A yet, to see if the doors made it.Based on the ventral view of the original model of the Shangri La that Bill built, there are two shuttered openings labeled "1" and "2" underneath the fantail. I would have personally numbered the main bay "1" and the others "2" and "3", but I didn't build it, so...
I would agree. There doesn't appear to be that much room for full-sized shuttles there. Since the Neo-Connie appears to be an homage/reboot of the original Shangri La-class, I predict (when ventral views do emerge of the Titan-A) those same doors also exist and are numbered similarly, explaining the "3" on the main doors.
Based on the ventral view of the original model of the Shangri La that Bill built, there are two shuttered openings labeled "1" and "2" underneath the fantail. I would have personally numbered the main bay "1" and the others "2" and "3", but I didn't build it, so...
Seems odd to have two drop-down doors right underneath the main shuttlebay. I agree that they seem better suited for cargo, but if that’s the case, why not just use the main door for that?
Dunno. Perhaps dedicated cargo loading doors won't bottleneck the main shuttlebay while replenishing supplies in dock?
I suppose you could always IM Bill. He's still on the board, so far as I know. Although, when the first pictures of the Titan-A started emerging, some of the comments elsewhere on the board from arguably less-talented individuals were less-than-polite; he saw it and I'm guessing hadn't returned. Bona-fide (and politely-worded) questions about certain aesthetic design choices may induce him to interact with us.
I suppose you could always IM Bill. He's still on the board, so far as I know. Although, when the first pictures of the Titan-A started emerging, some of the comments elsewhere on the board from arguably less-talented individuals were less-than-polite; he saw it and I'm guessing hadn't returned. Bona-fide (and politely-worded) questions about certain aesthetic design choices may induce him to interact with us.
Subtle homage to Voyager's "shuttlebay two" perhaps?
Still pissed it's not the Luna..
Voyager B? So I looks like someone's going to wreak the Voyager A then?
Voyager B? So I looks like someone's going to wreak the Voyager A then?
It's Starfleet. It's gonna end up burning through Enterprises and Voyagers like baby back ribs at a Texas diner.
Something something refit something something.
Correct.
