Am i the only one who feels this comment is part of a lowlevel misogynistic behavior? (i.e. dehumanizing women to how they look)
Predict denial or avoidance of being called out about that.
NO, i think it is strategic, influenced by Zaslav. The last 2 have movies YET to come out. Based on the interviews, it sounds like if Auqaman 2 ALSO becomes a bliion dollar blockbuster, Zaslav will want to hold on to Jason Maoa as Aquaman and squeeze out that money befor ehe gets a chance to be Lobo.
The problem with your theory is that A2 could be a hit, but the character is a part of a now-dead film universe (or will be after A2 is released, based on the way Gunn explained the order of the four films). All anyone knows about this version of Aquaman is tied to the MoS continuity--he is as much a part of that continuity / universe as Gadot's WW or Affleck's Batman, and with Gunn being clear that he's starting a new universe, I doubt the MoS continuity Aquaman will just be dragged over.
The Gunn films are recasting everyone, and that should apply to Aquaman. That, and Momoa has not been silent about wanting to take on the Lobo role--which would be a part of the Gunn-verse, so that pretty much brings an end to his Aquaman.
As for Ezra Miller... with all the money they sunk into it, a tax writeoff ain't an option. They won't say a bad word about the movie or actor (in fact Gunn literally hyping it as one of the best Superhero movies ever) . They will wait until the movie has made the most money they can before quietly putting away Ezra Miller and moving on.
The first instinct is to believe WB would wash their hands of Miller after the release of the Flash movie, but Gunn has been going on and on about the film to the degree that I would not be shocked if Gunn (with Zaslav's approval, of course) dropped Miller into the Gunn-verse.
The thing is, even if it is really good, i just don't seeBatgirl being so popular that it will keep rolling wiht free postive publicity or adding more subscribers the way Game of Thrones House of the Dragon is doing for HBOMax.
A bigger problem is that Batgirl has never been the headliner DC wanted her to be; at no point in the character's 56-year history has she been a major magnet for readers (as in becoming the A-lister on the level of The Big Three), no matter how well some stories were written, or the critical nods received, so the idea of a Batgirl movie drawing so much interest as to attract a notable number of new subscribers a dubious notion at best.
In my opinion, there were parts that were poorly written/directed, and the reason why Man of Steel wasn't a bllion dollar movie, and that deflated momentum.
Every superhero film does not need to be a billion dollar movie to succeed. Even the Donner Superman film--with star names, star talent behind the camera with one of the most swollen budgets up to that time, was a hit, but did not become the biggest film of all time--or of its release year, earning $300.5 million (worldwide) yet the musical / romantic comedy--Grease--outperformed it with $366.2 million.
“Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow” --sounds like Argo City won't survive? Again, this might be messy depending on how it goes with The Flash.
Messy? How so?