• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The new (massive spoiler) ship!

We see Galaxy Class parts (presumedly) being built on the surface of Mars in one of the timelines Worf hops to in Season 7.

I think someone from production said the parts and ferried to space for final assembly.

IBCXIxD.png

Maybe it is Apple's new Martian headquarters?? :biggrin:
 
Perhaps the ENTERPRISE-D superstructure was preassembled on the ground for ease of guarantying everything fit properly and then was disassembled into smaller sections for transport to the drydock in space.
Much easier to do the preliminary work without having to worry about a lack of atmosphere if something goes wrong.
(also don't have to worry about several hundred workers having to do it in spacesuits)
:shrug:
 
Since the shot of the Galaxy class parts on the surface of Mars was technically in an alternate universe, it could be hand waved away as not being the case in the prime universe, if someone really wanted.
 
Which is kind of weird because we'd already seen the Enterprise-D being constructed in space in the Drafting Room 5 simulation in TNG: "Booby Trap":
FELTcpuXIAIfJSw.jpg


Voyager would go on to show Galaxy-class ships being constructed in space again in "Relativity":
tumblr_m89pu6GVz51rzu2xzo1_1280.jpg


And of course the TNG Technical Manual explicitly states that the Enterprise was constructed in space, without any mention of components being built on the surface.

Perhaps it's a training facility is used to ensure trainees can learn about starship construction methods safely on the ground and in an atmosphere before they are let loose on the real thing? Or perhaps it's a Galaxy-class starship being deconstructed or wreckage being reconstructed, some sort of forensic analysis? Could it be the Yamato, or the unnamed ship Admiral Hanson was on at Wolf 359?

Or maybe it's just a trick of perspective and it's actually in low orbit, the background just makes it look like it's on the surface :shrug:
Doesn't the TM have a line about an initial six ships constructed and an additional six spaceframes being stored for future use? Could be what we're seeing here.
 
I wish they would go back to using physical models instead of CGI. But I know that will never happen.
You know the sad thing? I've seen more realistic looking CGI ships here on this board (and around the internet) than some of what we get in various TV shows (ST among others).

Shows like ST are always getting behind because of post-production work and they're always saying it costs so much to do those effects. Yet some on-line CGI artists are doing equal or better work at home. It's crazy.
 
It's a matter of time and resources. Fans can afford time to tinker and rerig and such. Not saying there isn't a way to streamline the process but I have no doubt that there is. Just that studios and the freelance artists they hire are not operating the same as fans.
 
Doesn't the TM have a line about an initial six ships constructed and an additional six spaceframes being stored for future use? Could be what we're seeing here.

It does say that, yes, but in the context of the episode Geordi uses the holodeck to recreate the laboratory in which the Enterprise-D's engines were designed (specifically the warp core, based on the graphics on the set and all the dialogue about power generation, modifying the the dilithium articulation, and aligning the matter and antimatter streams). When he first enters the simulation Geordi looks out the window at the Galaxy-class ship outside, in which we can see welding flares flickering amongst the exposed framework, and muses "right back where it all started". The strong implication is that the ship is the Enterprise herself, still under construction.
 
I wish they would go back to using physical models instead of CGI. But I know that will never happen.

Never say never... The Orville did that. Traditional physical models and motion control cameras, augmented with lashings of modern CGI of course, to deliberately evoke the glory days of 90s Trek. One might say the best of both worlds.

modelA.jpg
 
I wish they'd keep that warp effect
Nah. Every series has had its own warp effect.

You know the sad thing? I've seen more realistic looking CGI ships here on this board (and around the internet) than some of what we get in various TV shows (ST among others).

Shows like ST are always getting behind because of post-production work and they're always saying it costs so much to do those effects. Yet some on-line CGI artists are doing equal or better work at home. It's crazy.
The Star Destroyers in Rogue One looked really good.
 
Never say never... The Orville did that. Traditional physical models and motion control cameras, augmented with lashings of modern CGI of course, to deliberately evoke the glory days of 90s Trek. One might say the best of both worlds.
All comes down to money, time and emphasis.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top