• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Andor season one

Is the Empire radicalizing more people, or have they always been terrible and can just get away with it more now under the Empire?
Based on current real world examples it seems like these people were always there and when the wrong kind of people take power they are free to be the worst they can be. But clearly there are others who just don't know what they are getting into, something recent Star Wars has shown a lot of.
 
Based on current real world examples it seems like these people were always there and when the wrong kind of people take power they are free to be the worst they can be. But clearly there are others who just don't know what they are getting into, something recent Star Wars has shown a lot of.
There is also a corrupting influence that goes along with it, in identifying different values, like a desire for peace or security, or order, and then ramping up what is needed in order to maintain those values. As you say, some probably didn't know what they were getting in to but their desire to maintain that order, or security, became a part of them. Sadly, it doesn't take long, as I recall a story about a man who survived a concentration camp and was liberated. When he got home he discovered it was his own son who had turned him in.
 
In 1977 that was just some hot chick that Luke was going to bone, and probably marry some day.

Besides a 19 year old senator?

That is ridiculous, Unless this is the last days of Rome where everything is decadent and emperor's new clothes. I say that t he character was probably supposed to be almost 30? The same age as Han Solo.

If Leia was "supposed to be" 30, they would have cast an actress that was around that age. Carrie Fisher is younger than Mark Hamill. Ridiculous or not, Leia was supposed to be young. Lucas having absurdly young political figures in his movies was obviously deliberate, since he doubled down on it in TPM.
 
If Leia was "supposed to be" 30, they would have cast an actress that was around that age. Carrie Fisher is younger than Mark Hamill. Ridiculous or not, Leia was supposed to be young. Lucas having absurdly young political figures in his movies was obviously deliberate, since he doubled down on it in TPM.

Incaitas couldn't have been older than 4.
 
Show: There are seven levels, all with seven rooms, all with seven tables, all with seven workers.

My brain: Math problem accepted.
 
Still wonder if we will get the Ezra Bridger broadcast at the end. It was a galactic broadcast call for Rebellion during this year. I believe even Mon Mothma mentioned hearing it.

His broadcast was in 4 BBY. AFAIK Andor is still in 5 BBY.

The Broadcast happened in "Call to Action' which was after the episode "Empire Day" , which was 15 years after the founding of the Empire in 19BBY.

Though I guess the series could end in 4BBY. Season 2 is said to cover 4BBY to Rogue One, so it could also happen in that season.
 
Last edited:
But no apparent use of the Force when he did appear. So all it needs is for Sly Moore to appear in the senate* to be on equal grounds with Solo. And that's if Cinta isn't Force-sensitive.

* I suppose her not being shown during the dinner where supposedly she was a guest on suggests we might not.
 
He used the force to pull his saber to him.
Loved that. There was a sinister look to Maul that I felt was well done. Also, interestingly, I felt it gave the hint that Qi'ra might be trained in the ways of the Force.

But, then, for me, Maul was a dumb character in the Phantom Menace and really didn't get some sort of interesting story until Rebels. Solo's scene was odd in it's placement and rather unnecessary but I still think it made Maul menacing.
 
I didn't. And I believe Maul should have remained dead after "The Phantom Menace".
Just like everything related to the prequels, blame George.
At least the idea to bring him back. How he was brought up, George left up to Filoni and Co. (though he always got final approval on everything)
 
Last edited:
I didn't. And I believe Maul should have remained dead after "The Phantom Menace".
I would generally agree, but then I got the give the Twin Suns duel the highest marks. So, his resurrection was worth it for the scene. His ongoing beef with Sidious in TCW was...annoying. But, Sam Witwer's performance elevated otherwise less than interesting material.
 
Yeah, the person present when Maul dies remains the same. It just happens 30 years later and on a completely different planet.
 
It was absurdly brief, but as such it recalls stuff from Japanese cinema so I guess it's fine.
It's briefness makes it more appealing to me. Yes, Star Wars is fiction but certain facets like sword fighting had become too fantastical in the prequels. So, that fight was storytelling in one beautiful scene.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top