Two observations:
If Aledo is NA-01, what would be the registry of the presumed class-ship, the USS Texas? Or are pilot ships no longer named for the class now?
Also, that NA-01 registry reminds me of the mission patch in "First Flight" that was (mistakingly) labeled NA-01 instead of NX-01. It's canon now lol.
Good point about the registry. Unless the Texas’s registry is NA-00. Or maybe there is no USS Texas.
Going back to the episode, Buenamigo does say the Aledo is the 'first of three' automated starships... So maybe there is no USS Texas indeed.
Unfortunately, given the real-world-time precedent of the Sagan-class U.S.S. Stargazer (NCC-82893) from PIC season 2, I suspect the Kurtzman team disposed of previous Trek trends to avoid having any U.S.S. Sagan or U.S.S. Texas.There are 2 ways to pick a class name. Usually its after the first ship, but if you decide to give the entire class themed names then you can choose to call the class by the theme instead. Sometimes you might initially name it for the theme but later decide to switch to the first ship. For example, I think Starship class vessels are all named after famous starships. Later, Starfleet changed policy and switched the class name to Constitution. Danube class ships may have had something similar happen. Luna class ships are actually both since Luna means moon.
The novels had it both ways with the Vesta- class. Originally there were seven ships built, named after the for the seven hills of Rome, with Vesta just being the theme/project name, but eventually the writers needed another one, so they retconned that there actually had been a USS Vesta but its frame was overstressed during its shakedown cruise and the ship was mothballed until it was eventually repaired and brought into service.
Heh, in that case, though, I find the U.S.S. Vesta (82601) to have an acceptable registry in the system.Whoa, I had thought that there had been a Vesta all along, and wondered which 1 of the 7 hills had been left out.
There’s no evidence that a USS Sagan doesn’t exist..Unfortunately, given the real-world-time precedent of the Sagan-class U.S.S. Stargazer (NCC-82893) from PIC season 2, I suspect the Kurtzman team disposed of previous Trek trends to avoid having any U.S.S. Sagan or U.S.S. Texas.
Did you listen to Seven of Nine's dialogue in PIC 2.01? I really do not think she is the kind of person to not know what she is talking about when the matter is Borg technology.There’s no evidence that a USS Sagan doesn’t exist..
She said the Stargazer is the first of a new class of ships with Borg technology. Perhaps class here can mean “generation”? As in, the Sagan is a run of the mill Sagan class but the Stargazer is Starfleet’s first Borg-augmented ship.
It could just mean the Stargazer was first to get those upgrades.Did you listen to Seven of Nine's dialogue in PIC 2.01? I really do not think she is the kind of person to not know what she is talking about when the matter is Borg technology.
Someone commented, not sure where (probably another thread or the episode thread) that they did not list all the California class ships, as the person listing off the names was cut off in dialog.It is also interesting that USS San Francisco (in beta canon a Galaxy-class) and USS Los Angeles are not part of the California class as shown in the finale, though Dallas was one of the Texas class.
Someone commented, not sure where (probably another thread or the episode thread) that they did not list all the California class ships, as the person listing off the names was cut off in dialog.
It makes me think of STO's ship customizations.I loved seeing all the Cali color variations. Being not-front-line ships like the Galaxies and Sovereigns and whatnot, they seem to have a kind of "Pirate Fleet" flavor. They don't have to worry about raising the eyebrows of tight-assed admirals, so they boost their morale and crew pride by giving their ships custom paint jobs. I hope we get to see them all in official top-views, one day.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.