Speaking as a person who answered 'no', I'm surprised that that 'nos' have the majority.
Was just thinking this. I started with TOS repeats on Saturday mornings and on laserdisc when I was 9 or so. That's over 30 years. Mind you, I did a hell of a lot of catching up this year. But still, I wasn't behind on anything before 2010, except TAS.I guess it depends when you start watching Trek. I started in the mid 70s with TAS and reruns of TOS, so it was pretty easy to keep up the new series as they came out, but someone starting the journey pretty recently (within the last 10-15 years or so), it would be like trying to drink from a firehose.
I'm not. It's why I posted the thread. I have to imagine that the people who have seen everything currently available are growing smaller in number than those who haven't, even among fans. The longevity, the diversity of style, look, format, platform, intent. It's gotten hard for me to even believe that all of it, in all its variation, could actually appeal to a single viewer, at this point. I've come to think that the only reason anyone would want to see all of it, is because they've made that a goal for themselves, & they choose that because they truly already identify as a fan, who is willing to go with it wherever the winds of time take it... a do or die fan.Speaking as a person who answered 'no', I'm surprised that that 'nos' have the majority.
I'm a fan of Farscape, Firefly, Dark Matter, Killjoys, Red Dwarf, Hyperdrive, Babylon 5, Doctor Who, Stargate, Futurama, Cowboy Bebop, Outlaw Star, The Orville, Star Wars, The Expanse, Battlestar Galactica, Lexx, Andromeda... well okay maybe not Andromeda. Give me a crew of people having adventures in a spaceship or spacestation or space in general and I'm usually interested, and I assume a lot of people here are the same. So I think it would be weirder if the Star Trek series didn't all appeal to me. Though I do struggle with some of them sometimes, for various reasons.It's gotten hard for me to even believe that all of it, in all its variation, could actually appeal to a single viewer, at this point.
Oh I totally get that, & I'm sure you're not alone, but I get the feeling lately that it's the anomaly. Old 60's sci-fi like TOS, Lost In Space, etc... or even old 80s/90s sci-fi like TNG, Babylon 5, etc... are just so very different than what's happening now, that I find it hard to think it's all universally appealing. I mean the whole reason why a franchise puts a new spin on something like Daniel Craig's Bond, is because Sean Connery's Bond is antiquated. I mean people might still like it, but are they equally as appealing to both audiences? Probably not as much?I'm a fan of Farscape, Firefly, Dark Matter, Killjoys, Red Dwarf, Hyperdrive, Babylon 5, Doctor Who, Stargate, Futurama, Cowboy Bebop, Outlaw Star, The Orville, Star Wars, The Expanse, Battlestar Galactica, Lexx, Andromeda... well okay maybe not Andromeda. Give me a crew of people having adventures in a spaceship or spacestation or space in general and I'm usually interested, and I assume a lot of people here are the same. So I think it would be weirder if the Star Trek series didn't all appeal to me. Though I do struggle with some of them sometimes, for various reasons.
Oh I totally get that, & I'm sure you're not alone, but I get the feeling lately that it's the anomaly. Old 60's sci-fi like TOS, Lost In Space, etc... or even old 80s/90s sci-fi like TNG, Babylon 5, etc... are just so very different than what's happening now, that I find it hard to think it's all universally appealing. I mean the whole reason why a franchise puts a new spin on something like Daniel Craig's Bond, is because Sean Connery's Bond is antiquated. I mean people might still like it, but are they equally as appealing to both audiences? Probably not as much?
I can agree with that... but just looking at it statistically, what are the odds any given viewer now would invest the effort into doing so? It's a hefty commitmentI dunno. When I first really got into Trek I did it in the early 00s and as you said above, watching Trek from TOS-ENT in order was something I had to make quite a lengthy effort to do. Just shy of five years.
In the 00s I saw 1960s/80s/90s shows and they looked like what they were but I was invested enough in the concept to look past it. It kind of makes it less monolithic when it’s broken up into spin-off series from different decades and to a greater or lesser degree each show stands apart due to the time they were made in.
The thing about TOS or the Berman shows is they may look of their time, but they were the best looking thing of their time as far as production quality goes. No science fiction show Pre-Streaming Trek looked as good as it’s Trek contemporaries.
Babylon 5 is a good example. It looks like a typical 90s science fiction show. Put it alongside DS9 and you can feel a lot more money went into the latter.
I think TV shows are different now, but if someone comes to Star Trek through say DSC or SNW and likes the core values of those shows then they may be able to find something to love in the older shows.
I can agree with that... but just looking at it statistically, what are the odds any given viewer now would invest the effort into doing so? It's a hefty commitment
I caught TOS on repeats, had a long wait for the BBC to get TNG and hoovered up everything including the less stellar Voyager and Enterprise. And loads of novels.The longevity, the diversity of style, look, format, platform, intent. It's gotten hard for me to even believe that all of it, in all its variation, could actually appeal to a single viewer, at this point.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.