Of course not. But, I don't want a film sold to me on fan service. Sell me a good story, with fan service as spice not the main course. And prefer none if possible.But one does not necessarily preclude the other.
Of course not. But, I don't want a film sold to me on fan service. Sell me a good story, with fan service as spice not the main course. And prefer none if possible.But one does not necessarily preclude the other.
I am just ok with Holland as Spiderman. But, I like Dr. Strange which was my big draw. And it was a heart warming well constructed story that had some flavorings of fan service. It worked very well, and better than I expected.No Way Home was a great story. A great *Holland Spider-man* story. I know this because I absolutely loved it and I don't care about Garfield and absolutely hate Maguire and his entire movie universe.
I don't care how much it was 'sold' on the basis of fanservice.
Point of order: I'm no fan of the Maguire films, even after I recently rewatched them for the first time since their initial release leading up to No Way Home. I actually like the first Garfield film (more so than I did the first time around) but the second one is just terrible.In reality, most people who like the MCU like the old Spidey-Movies and the other way around. It was an exciting and satisfying way to bridge a gap and after 2 decades at the cinema, Spidey is a character who deserves a bit of fan service.
I like all the Spider-Men. It was joyous to see Maguire, Garfield (a seriously underrated Parker IMO) and Holland together.
Point of order: I'm no fan of the Maguire films, even after I recently rewatched them for the first time since their initial release leading up to No Way Home. I actually like the first Garfield film (more so than I did the first time around) but the second one is just terrible.
I talked quite a bit about that in anticipation thread and discovered that I was far from the only person who felt this way.
I'm still not even sure I understand the context of calling the film gutless. What would make the film more courageous?
I enjoyed this movie.![]()
In the temple at Wundagore there's not just a carving of Wanda but also much smaller carvings next to her and a brief close-up made it pretty clear that one of those is Wiccan/Billy, so I assume the other one is Speed/Tommy. Also, when America tried to fight Wanda in the end the first portal she opened up - before showing Wanda to Billy and Tommy - opened into a literal hellscape. Plus Chthon is referred to not just as a demon but as 'the FIRST demon'.
Not conclusive, of course, but I'm more convinced than ever that there are plans to continue Wanda's story from here and quite probably in a big way involving a literal trip to/stay in hell itself.
Yeah I'm basically the same; I liked the first two Rami films when they came out (still only seen SM3 once and no interest in revisiting), though feel like they haven't aged all that well. Maybe I've just gotten more cynical, but I bump up against the cheese and the saccharine drama way more than I used to. I basically skipped the Garfield movies when they were new. only getting around to watching them a few years ago, and I liked the first one way more that I expected to (though not without it's flaws), while the second one was just a hot mess of a film.Point of order: I'm no fan of the Maguire films, even after I recently rewatched them for the first time since their initial release leading up to No Way Home. I actually like the first Garfield film (more so than I did the first time around) but the second one is just terrible.
I talked quite a bit about that in anticipation thread and discovered that I was far from the only person who felt this way.
Yeah I'm basically the same; I liked the first two Rami films when they came out (still only seen SM3 once and no interest in revisiting), though feel like they haven't aged all that well. Maybe I've just gotten more cynical, but I bump up against the cheese and the saccharine drama way more than I used to.
It's all melodrama either way. Honestly I just wish they gave her more to do in general besides just being the prize for Peter to covet, reject and/or rescue. Her choices never bothered me since none of the movies gave her much agency to begin with.I still have a hard time believing people had much sympathy for MJ the way she ditched John on their wedding day to run to Peter. I KNOW it was a homage to "The Graduate" but at least there the people involved in the wedding were all unsympathetic.
I don't know if it was specific to the IMAX version, but certain scenes had a high frame rate, which to me looks really weird in a feature film.
Kor
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.