I like Star Trek Continues....
I like dill pickles, which are as relevant to a discussion of Trek canon as STC is.
I like Star Trek Continues....
Of course, the plot of Beyond made no sense whatever...
It truly is a rabbit's hole - "Amok Time" makes no sense...None of the Kelvin movies made any sense…
On the whole, though, they were pretty fun. 1 and 3, in particular.
It truly is a rabbit's hole - "Amok Time" makes no sense...![]()
If there is anyone who demonstrated a clear lack of Cannon when they took over the franchise it was Rick Berman and Brannon Braga. I'm like the people who were running the franchise today, they were not fans and never even watched TOS until very late in their stewardship of the franchise. ( and in fact were encouraged to not ever watched TOS by Gene Roddenberry himself.)My point is that when the owners change and the new owners show a clear lack of interest in following the previous canon, what they add is clearly not the same canon as what came before. To add to canon you need to pay attention to what came before or you are literally making mistakes and continuity errors. In 2005 CBS came into the picture and they have imposed changes that are obviously based on business and not creative decisions.
Great.Star Trek Beyond felt like Star Trek, unlike the previous two films, and I'm glad to hear MA was useful to Simon Pegg. I wish he was writing the next one.
There is no disagreement here. You're just plain and simply incorrect.I think we will have to agree to disagree on this. Like I said somewhere above, about all they are paying attention to from TOS is a rough timeline. The finer details that a lot of us pour over are ignored.
Even Roddenberry didn't have that power really. He declared TAS non-canon and said as much about Star Trek 5 to the point TAS isn't in the 1990s Trek Encyclopedia and his opinion of 5's apocryphal status is mentioned. But now that he's gone, TAS and 5 are fully on Trek's official website database as canon.Yup, I strongly dislike about 75% of Voyager not to mention all the TNG movies and season 4 of Enterprise. That dislike doesn’t make those entries not canon.
Even Roddenberry didn't have that power really. He declared TAS non-canon and said as much about Star Trek 5 to the point TAS isn't in the 1990s Trek Encyclopedia and his opinion of 5's apocryphal status is mentioned. But now that he's gone, TAS and 5 are fully on Trek's official website database as canon.
Sorry I'm going to have to point out that I think Kurtzman's stance is that any words seen on screen or dialogue is canon. Because obviously with Robert April or Kyle... Basically, since no dialogue or words were ever mentioned about their race, that's open to change, whatever was onscreen aside.Exactly. Canon is a decision by those who are in charge. Now Alex Kurtzman runs the show. He’s decided that anything onscreen, live action or animated is canon. But I feel like we’re just going in circles at this point.
Cool.Sorry I'm going to have to point out that I think Kurtzman's stance is that any words seen on screen or dialogue is canon. Because obviously with Robert April or Kyle... Basically, since no dialogue or words were ever mentioned about their race, that's open to change, whatever was onscreen aside.
"The Menagerie" makes so little sense that not even light can escape...
Sorry I'm going to have to point out that I think Kurtzman's stance is that any words seen on screen or dialogue is canon. Because obviously with Robert April or Kyle... Basically, since no dialogue or words were ever mentioned about their race, that's open to change, whatever was onscreen aside.
Cobbled together so they could use the original pilot to get ahead on the production schedule, IIRC. The framing device doesn't stand up to close scrutiny.We just watched that the other night, because my wife had no memory of it, and I wanted her to understand all the Pike stuff from SNW.
It is really….weird.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.