I'm more worried about why Frenchman Jean-Luc Picard speaks with an English accent.
I always assumed that Picard, his family and friends all speak with English accents simply because the local English teacher in La Barre did.
I'm more worried about why Frenchman Jean-Luc Picard speaks with an English accent.
I'm sure they could could have cut the arbitrary submarine for something as momentous as the first man in space.Gagarin's achievement was great, but there was not room to put that in there,
Perhaps he was conceived as such, but he was apparently from the U.S.A., not that I could tell the difference, of course, for as with Uhura, and Kirk their ethnicity could not really be felt. One might make an argument McCoy is a slight U.S.A. folksy stereotype, but certainly not by much and he too could have been from anywhere.Sulu was conceived as a "pan-Asian" (which, at the time, would be East Asian) so that "covers" Japan/China/Korea. That he is played by an actor of Japanese descent, or that he later became a character of primarily Japanese descent is immaterial in the '66-69 context.
People say it is a function of the time, and I find myself disagreeing, as anything after T.O.S. became even more U.S.A.-centric.For television of the time, Trek's casting was extremely progressive. Compared to contemporary litSF, it was about par.
No, I know well the U.S.A. is the third most populous country on the planet with about 300 million inhabitants, with the first and second both being slightly more than a billion.One of us knew it, at any rate. The other should probably have taken time to check their figures before making a rash assertion.
I'm sure they could could have cut the arbitrary submarine for something as momentous as the first man in space..
Ah, now I see why they didn't do it. Apparently some people are offended at the display of Soviet achievements.they already had several scenes of people in space helmets. maybe they could have put that dog the russians killed in orbit, on the screen, instead.
As I noted earlier in the thread, the Writers' Guide explicitly said that McCoy was from Georgia. He also references Georgia in a few episodes, like "This Side of Paradise", where talks about making a Georgia-style mint julep:One might make an argument McCoy is a slight U.S.A. folksy stereotype, but certainly not by much and he too could have been from anywhere.
KIRK: I'll bet you've even grown your tonsils back.
MCCOY: Sho'nuf. Hey, Jim boy, y'all ever have a real cold Georgia-style mint julep, huh?
I'm fond of Gagarin. I celebrate Yuri's Night, sometimes when I know anyone around doing so. I think stepping into that Vostok capsule, or even moreso, jumping out of it to before it hit the ground is one of the great acts of bravery. I'm not dismissive of Soviet space achievements though I will state that apart from being a year or two ahead in some areas, they were generally behind and Russian space activity would be a historical footnote except for the US bankrolling their own efforts on ISS to keep it going, politically. I'm also realistic that there was less than two minutes in a credit scene (my favorite of any Trek series) packed with stuff, and Gagarin being included would have been awkward.Ah, now I see why they didn't do it. Apparently some people are offended at the display of Soviet achievements.
As I noted earlier in the thread, the Writers' Guide explicitly said that McCoy was from Georgia. He also references Georgia in a few episodes, like "This Side of Paradise", where talks about making a Georgia-style mint julep:
Yes, that is the impression I gained but I wasn't too sure. It being for a U.S.A. audiences these references are of course more subtle than what a European can easily determine.McCoy is clearly from the American South. A specific part of the American South. Sounds like my Dad.
Certainly the first artificial satellite and human in space are monumentous achievements in space exploration worthy of inclusion in a title about space exploration.I'm fond of Gagarin. I celebrate Yuri's Night, sometimes when I know anyone around doing so. I think stepping into that Vostok capsule, or even moreso, jumping out of it to before it hit the ground is one of the great acts of bravery. I'm not dismissive of Soviet space achievements though I will state that apart from being a year or two ahead in some areas, they were generally behind and Russian space activity would be a historical footnote except for the US bankrolling their own efforts on ISS to keep it going, politically. I'm also realistic that there was less than two minutes in a credit scene (my favorite of any Trek series) packed with stuff, and Gagarin being included would have been awkward.
I'm sure they could could have cut the arbitrary submarine for something as momentous as the first man in space.
Perhaps he was conceived as such, but he was apparently from the U.S.A., not that I could tell the difference, of course, for as with Uhura, and Kirk their ethnicity could not really be felt. One might make an argument McCoy is a slight U.S.A. folksy stereotype, but certainly not by much and he too could have been from anywhere.
This is strangely offset by Scott and especially Chekov being caricatures of their ethnicity.
People say it is a function of the time, and I find myself disagreeing, as anything after T.O.S. became even more U.S.A.-centric.
Sounds like the roll call for a squad of US soldiers in a WWII flick."Cohen", "Leahy", "Andersen", "Alessandro", "Papandreou", "Kowalski
I was a bit shocked to find some blatant yellow face in some 80's Doctor Who.Things don't progress linearly. TOS was very progressive TV casting for its time. Subsequent Treks were on par for their times.
Interestingly the US was apparently capable of lobbing a satellite into orbit before Sputnik using the Jupiter-C rocket, but as that was derivative of the V-2 and an Army missile for partly political reasons they went with Vanguard instead and literally blew it (up). Only after several Vanguard embarrassments did they give the go-ahead to use the Jupiter-C, but they went with JPL’s satellite instead of von Braun’s.
Sounds like the roll call for a squad of US soldiers in a WWII flick.![]()
Lt. Rahda, a female character of Indian descent, occupied the helm in "That Which Survives" and "Requiem for Methuselah."
Apparently in this case means that it was something that was mentioned at one point but did not make a particular impact.I'm not sure what "apparently from the U.S.A." means. He came off as American as Kirk, who was explicitly not American (again, "Iowa" notwithstanding, he at least spent his young teens on Tarsus IV). And Uhura spoke Swahili in her very first appearance.
I can't say it made as much of an impact on me as it did on others amidst the sea of other “North American English accents” on characters that should not be having them.McCoy was not a slight U.S.A. folksy stereotype. He was as Southern Gentleman from Georgia as Scotty was from Aberdeen.
Well, firstly, I never used the word “progressive”; the last time I got into a debate about that, I found that people have very different definitions of that word, I used “U.S.A.-centric” to be more specific, but it can be specificity to any country.Things don't progress linearly. TOS was very progressive TV casting for its time. Subsequent Treks were on par for their times.
Apparently in this case means that it was something that was mentioned at one point but did not make a particular impact.
I can't say it made as much of an impact on me as it did on others amidst the sea of other “North American English accents” on characters that should not be having them.
Ordinarily I would simply say that all of them are “North-American” because they speak with North-American English accents, but that falls logic has proven wrong when many characters in Star Trek that are not North-American do so, and of course Picard appears very English to me, despite being French. The characters seem to mostly follow the accent of the actors in practice., which is perhaps why Scott and Chekov were the only ones that felt so excessive, as they were faking theirs.
Well, firstly, I never used the word “progressive”; the last time I got into a debate about that, I found that people have very different definitions of that word, I used “U.S.A.-centric” to be more specific, but it can be specificity to any country.
And I find myself not agreeing that other Star Trek was on par for it's time at all, but rather a far bit worse in terms of science fiction drama. They aired concurrently with say, StarGate, Neon Genesis Evangelion, FarScape, Earth Final Conflict, Dragon Ball, and, The Tribe, which didn't fall into similar trappings and also, at least to a far lesser level, did not fall into the irksome idea of aliens having human cultures and genders that Star Trek is so known for though FarScape was certainly full of that.
I'd also point out that before television, literary classics very often were not unduly centred around the country the auctor resided in when this would be narratively implausible.
Hm. IMDB lists it as one of her appearances.Rahda isn't in "Requiem for Methuselah," but your good point stands.
Hm. IMDB lists it as one of her appearances.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.