Au contraire, mon ami.Hell, James Bond is Scottish and then he's Australian and then he's English...
even Star Trek's Q couldn't keep up with all of that change.
They said that but I wonder how truthful they were being when they said it. I guess only they would know the answer to that question.
In interviews the producers of Voyager have said they felt Locarno's actions in that episode made him "irredeemable". (TNG Season 5 DVD-special feature, Memorable Missions Year Five: "The First Duty")
It also comes down to how much money may have to be spent. 26ish episodes a year might add up quite a bit, over 10 episodes with a character with more limited time. Though, I have no idea how that actually works so I could be completely wrong.If this is true then I am not sure the reason used to explain why Nick Lacarno became Tom Paris holds up. 'The First Duty" was written by Ronald Moore and Naren Shankar who were both staff writers.Well Moore was. I think Shankar was but not sure.
Au contraire, mon ami.
![]()
Au contraire, mon ami.
![]()
Because they don't want to.
And dude, you don't get away with "hmmm interesting..." You now explain exactly why you find that so interesting, or we have every right to assume that we already know. And it's a pretty ugly look.
Never understood why Locarno was supposedly irredeemable. Jeri Taylor's once quasi-canonical Pathways gave Paris basically the same backstory (except with him ending up joining a terrorist group after).
Same here. To me, Paris is a bit more unforgivable given he basically joined a known terrorist organization.I never understood that either. Locarno seemed like a okay kid that got in over his head but he was still looking at saving the team and basically took the fall for all of them.
I came to like him after a while. But he was trying too hard to be the 'bad boy' at the beginning, and RDM just didn't pull it off. Plus, he said something weird and racist to Chakotay in the pilot.I did like Paris but in the end I feel like they could have did the exact same arc with Locarno.
Actually, Roddenberry was never able to completely acquire the rights to Trek.Changing a character's race in casting does not make them a different character. Paramount still owes the Roddenberry estate for Robert April.
I think I would have preferred Locarno to Tom Paris. Paris turned me off immediately, but I might have had some interest in his redemption arc.
Just like Gene would wantFans are so invested in the universe all they see is alternate timelines. This is the same timeline as TOS, but it's a distinct real-life adaptation of that timeline.
If this is true then I am not sure the reason used to explain why Nick Lacarno became Tom Paris holds up. 'The First Duty" was written by Ronald Moore and Naren Shankar who were both staff writers.Well Moore was. I think Shankar was but not sure.
Never understood why Locarno was supposedly irredeemable.
Jeri Taylor's once quasi-canonical Pathways gave Paris basically the same backstory (except with him ending up joining a terrorist group after).
Same here. To me, Paris is a bit more unforgivable given he basically joined a known terrorist organization.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.