• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Season 3 Cast Announcement

Yeah, you can't change Worf -- he's too iconic. I suspect that if the creators of DIS had known that they would bring Worf back a few years later, they might not have re-designed the Klingon makeup so extensively.

yes…because the Discovery folk are well know for being super concerned with visual continuity.
 
And today I feel bad for Alison Pill, Michelle Hurd, Evan Evagora (Even though they basically wrote him out of Season 2 early), Isa Broines, and Santiago Cabrera. In 5 or 10 years time they won't be remembered for being in a Star Trek series. They became afterthoughts today.

Oh god, I hope these young actors will have something else in their resume besides Star Trek! Do you know how many of the TOS cast didn't want to be associated / typecast with Star Trek so they could move on? It was only when everyone got older that they realized it was a decent and reliable cash cow. Look up "I Am Not Spock"... then look up "I Am Spock" to see how Nimoy backpeddled.
 
Sci said:
Yeah, you can't change Worf -- he's too iconic. I suspect that if the creators of DIS had known that they would bring Worf back a few years later, they might not have re-designed the Klingon makeup so extensively.
yes…because the Discovery folk are well know for being super concerned with visual continuity.

Being willing to change visual continuity in a new production is a very different thing if you think you're never going to re-use the old elements again. You make those changes with the assumption that the audience can suspend disbelief with you since the older elements aren't present in the newer production.

But if you start bringing in those older elements, then that completely changes the "ask" you're making of the audience re: suspension of disbelief. It's perfectly legitimate to have totally different Klingons if you're confident you'll never use the old Klingon design again; but if you bring back an iconic old Klingon character with his old makeup, then suddenly the level of suspension of disbelief you're asking for is very different.

So, no, I don't think the creators of DIS would have gone with as extensive a redesign of the Klingon makeup if they had known they'd be bringing back Worf in a couple of years.
 
Yeah, you can't change Worf -- he's too iconic. I suspect that if the creators of DIS had known that they would bring Worf back a few years later, they might not have re-designed the Klingon makeup so extensively.

Personally, I think the best bet would be to include both TNG-style and DIS-style Klingons, and throw in a line saying that the DIS-style Klingons were another mutation caused by the Augment virus.

Plus we might be seeing a TNG style Klingon in SNW season 2 if that actor selfie was real
 
Maybe those who don't want these elemenets could simply avoid these posts.

And I don't see why fans of Star Trek: Picard should not want or prefer Star Trek: Picard characters. Why shouldn't they want more?
I'd welcome that - saves wasted time and effort for both.

PIC characters have been in both S1 and 2 (except Zhaban, who no one so far seems to be missing *). Who else do you think they should add in S3 to get more PIC characters? Again: Even if each of the new characters from TNG get a whole episode for just themselves, that leaves 7 episodes for all the rest.

They prefer looking at the future instead of the past
Yes, because TUC was in the past, before the previous movies, and not after.
Just like seeing these announced characters in 2401 means seeing them in 2379. Or 2364? I'm confused where in the past we'd be looking.
:p

* Correction: There is one single post indicating this in the whole PIC forum.
 
Last edited:
Wasn’t the whole reason they brought Data back and unplugged him was because Spiner didn’t want to do the makeup anymore?

I thought it was just to frustrate me by pointlessly and annoyingly killing my favorite character every time he pokes his head up.
Spiner should have been recast if he didn't want the gig anymore, Data's life had only begun.

BOOOO!!! Boo, I say!
 
Random, and probably overthinking:

So in the season 3 teaser, at the point at which Brent Spiner starts talking, the music changes to the opening from The Search for Spock. And a few seconds later, Riker talks about it being time to take a road trip and Troi assures Picard he won't be alone.

Search for Spock music, a currently dead character, and a loyal crew telling the captain they'll go on an adventure with him? Seems kinda... on the nose, doesn't it?

Or am I thinking about this too much?
 
I will concede that the writers for modern Trek do tend to "fall back" on legacy character, but three things: 1) Star Trek is an almost 60 year old franchise with a huge playground of characters and canon, it's almost impossible not to bring back legacy elements...this isn't like in 1987 when there were only 79 episodes and four movies. 2) Many long-term fans have been dying for a proper ending for the TNG cast for 20 years after Nemesis. 3) Unlike in the latter-half of the Berman era, Trek producers seem to be more keen on listening to fans (SNW is only happening because fans wanted it) while still trying to do unexpected things (with mixed success e.g. Picard season 1).

We are sort of handcuffed. It is either mine the past or go forward and Discovery jumping ahead makes that tough not only because it is hard story wise to go beyond that and even more difficult from a production and aesthetic perspective.

Maybe that can be patched by retconning the Discovery/Strange New Worlds into a distinct time line and leave the burn and all of that to the side so you aren't constrained by that destiny and don't have it hanging over the audience even if you just ignore it and play in the sandbox before that all goes down.
That also allows the possibility of side stepping the choke point for SNW and allow Pike and company to have an open ended story that can go anywhere for any length of time.
 
Bringing the characters back period.
They also get upset when people want more TOS looking designs, so whatever.
Oh at least we can all be sure these people will not look like in 2363-2379 ;)
(Btw, Riker's beard seems to be shorter than in S1, more like in TNG :p)
 
Bringing back Data again would be awful, even if they do better with the de-aging this time. It would basically be invalidating the entire story of Season 1. Whatever other issues Season 1 had (and there were many) the final scenes with Data and Picard were beautifully written. Save for the fact that Geordi didn't get to be there, it was the perfect sendoff.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top