Being long lived would also do that.They set a precedent when she appeared the same age in the 19th century as the 24th.
Being long lived would also do that.They set a precedent when she appeared the same age in the 19th century as the 24th.
They made an effort, but unless one wishes to spend an inordinate amount of money removing 30 years off of human flesh, there comes a point where you, the viewer, has to suck it up and realize it's just not possible, nor reasonable, to assume production companies will spend hundreds of man hours and thousands more dollars spiffying up someone's age lines for the appeasement of said viewer. Reasonable expectations, yes. Diminishing returns at high cost? No.Since the dawn of motion pictures, filmmakers have used make-up and later digital effects to alter the appearance of actors, very often to make them appear a different age as the character who is doing the performing. It's part of the game.
if you write yourself "ageless" characters and decide to dust those characters off 3 decades later, yes, it's highly advisable to make a minimal effort to address the inconsistency, whether in dialogue or by employing those aforementioned effects. It's how you create and maintain the illusion.
It doesn't make someone "entitled" to expect that that effort will be made.
Between 20 and 30, most people look the same in terms of age progression. Between 30 and 40, most people start to show their age. 40 to 50? It becomes far more noticeable. There are also some people who, as they get older, appear to age more or less rapidly. There are 40 year olds that look 60, and 60 year olds that look 40.They set a precedent when she appeared the same age in the 19th century as the 24th.
To be fair, that's been the struggle with dramatic presentations for a long time. That's why we get special editions and director's cuts.One line from Guinan, and one line from Q, saved thousands of dollars, and all it made upset were people who are unreasonable in their willingness to understand human bodies have limits, as do budgets.
Very true, but some people are presenting this as a fault of the producers, rather than as just something that happens to all humans eventually. If the viewer has any grace, they will understand this and accept that stopping time, even in the virtual world, requires significantly more resources than what may be available.To be fair, that's been the struggle with dramatic presentations for a long time. That's why we get special editions and director's cuts.
While reasonable, I believe this falls back on an emotional reaction that may not be reasoned with.Very true, but some people are presenting this as a fault of the producers, rather than as just something that happens to all humans eventually. If the viewer has any grace, they will understand this and accept that stopping time, even in the virtual world, requires significantly more resources than what may be available.
Orla Brady.60 year olds that look 40
Fun fact, the Borg beamed through the Enterprises shields in Q-Who.
That, I think, is right at the heart of it.While reasonable, I believe this falls back on an emotional reaction that may not be reasoned with.
100%.Orla Brady.
Yes, but I'm unevolved.
Note: this is me making a joke.
I guarantee you my jokes are not funny.Perhaps the joke was not funny.
Drunkenness and diplomacy is de rigueur from time out of mind.
There are 40 year olds that look 60, and 60 year olds that look 40.
The Sisko's Defiant could Beam through Kirk's shields (In Trials and Tribblelations) because their technology was several orders of magnitude more impressive.
Correct about Trials and Tribble-ations:Whilst I agree with the gist of your overall argument, I believe this specific thing is not correct. From what I recall the Enterprise didn't have her shields up; rather, they had to time the beaming to the Enterprise's sensor scan cycle so the transport wasn't detected.
However, in TNG: "Relics" that the Enterprise-D seems to be able to beam through the Jenolan's shields without much of an issue, suggesting that it is quite possible given large enough differences in technological generation.
Plus, Guinan and Q are still mysterious aliens for god's sake.They made an effort, but unless one wishes to spend an inordinate amount of money removing 30 years off of human flesh, there comes a point where you, the viewer, has to suck it up and realize it's just not possible, nor reasonable, to assume production companies will spend hundreds of man hours and thousands more dollars spiffying up someone's age lines for the appeasement of said viewer. Reasonable expectations, yes. Diminishing returns at high cost? No.
One line from Guinan, and one line from Q, saved thousands of dollars, and all it made upset were people who are unreasonable in their willingness to understand human bodies have limits, as do budgets.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.