And I said that in my post. But knowing something intellectually and being told all your life again and again and again that such a thing is wrong is going to elicit involuntary emotional reactions, even if your brain can parse it out that nothing illegal/inethical is happening.There's no question that Picard is abusing a power dynamic here. On the contrary. Laris makes the move on him, he does not reciprocate and they leave it at that.
Captain Freeman's crew has had a couple of encounters with him as well.From Picard's point of view he hasn't seen Q in almost 30 years. He may have heard stories of Janeway's encounters with him but that may have been the extent of his Q experience between 2370 and 2400.
I don't really get this. It's not at all that he's her boss and she's an employee. It's the 24th (25th?) century - Laris isn't there because she has to be, but because she wants to be with him.
It was made abundantly clear in the first season that she and Zhaban had a long association with Picard and had a lot of loyalty to him. They also clearly enjoyed being there.
There's no question that Picard is abusing a power dynamic here. On the contrary. Laris makes the move on him, he does not reciprocate and they leave it at that.
And I said that in my post. But knowing something intellectually and being told all your life again and again and again that such a thing is wrong is going to elicit involuntary emotional reactions, even if your brain can parse it out that nothing illegal/inethical is happening.
Well this is an issue that time as come and gone long before the period we are in. The issue of is your consciousness, the nature of who you are capable of retaining itself in different environments and still be you would likely have been a major concern when transporter technology was approved for living beings. But lets be utterly clear. We have had consciousness in the a ship, in a computer, in transporter buffers, switched into other beings, duplicated in two copies, we have had them in energy forms and out in vacuum, and these issues have never, ever been an issue with considering if someone is the same being. Hell we have had a computer program that is considered sentient in a biological body as well. The biggest issue we have seen is consent. Now we can argue that is an issue that could be rationally debated. But the debate about if someone is still the same should have long been a settled idea. Really about the only thing that is done is a medical exam. And that certainly wasn't ever shown to take much time at all.It's more the handwavy nature of it. Worf theoretically gets in trouble, even if it amounts to nothing because of main character plot armor. And sure, the same applies to Juranti too, but it's kind of like... as someone watching, I guess it's meant to be a bit of a joke now?
Maybe it'll come up again and inform her character as a past trauma, but they way they presented it makes it feel like she just made a "whoopsiedaisy".
I know Trek is all about ignoring continuity, but also this is a different era of TV and even then, I know I wasn't the only one who thought her murder was pretty unforgivable in the context that they presented it on the show.
Combining these since my answer is the same, but I guess it's a question of "what is human" I suppose. Juranti jokes that Picard is "positronic" now, so all his actions are based on the programming of the body's positronic brain. Is that still Picard, or a very close programmatic reproduction of Picard? Is there a difference?
This is like the question of whether transporters murder you every time you use one, but taken to the next level, because the idea of a singular consciousness is still kind of amorphous in the realm of Star Trek. Clearly you can transfer "minds" through techniques like the Vulcan mind meld, so the idea of a "soul" is something tangible that you can scientifically manipulate. If the mind/soul is just another "organ" you can transplant, then maybe it just doesn't matter if it's placed in Doctor McKoy or an Android body.
But also I'm not sure if the show is even going to go there. lol
I've seen complaints of Picard going blank and outright admitting he didn't know what to do during the Borg attack, and that it's out of character. I don't think it's out of character since Picard is old, he's lost the edge he once had, and just isn't that grizzled military heavy hitter anymore.
I'm surprised the Borg thing wasn't called a mile away. Voice of a legion, requesting Picard by name--all happened in Best of Both Worlds.Picard had reservations about even going out there again, saying to the Admiral that there are better highly qualified people to deal with it. We even saw on the La Sirena in season 1 Picard was slower. Age does that to people. This is not the same Jean-Luc Picard as his days on the Enterprise, nor should it be.
You're forgetting that the only reason Picard is on the Stargazer is because the unknown transmission (from the BORG) specifically asked for him.I've seen complaints of Picard going blank and outright admitting he didn't know what to do during the Borg attack, and that it's out of character. I don't think it's out of character since Picard is old, he's lost the edge he once had, and just isn't that grizzled military heavy hitter anymore.
What is out of character is, knowing all that, Picard apparently re-entered Starfleet anyway and Starfleet accepted him and put him back into that position. He just shouldn't be out there anymore in a military setting like that. Even the Ambassador thing hinted at in TNG's finale would have been a better choice.
Picard had reservations about even going out there again, saying to the Admiral that there are better highly qualified people to deal with it. We even saw on the La Sirena in season 1 Picard was slower. Age does that to people. This is not the same Jean-Luc Picard as his days on the Enterprise, nor should it be.
It seems my point isn't clear. I get that Picard changed. What I don't get is why anyone in-universe would, knowing that, put him back out into Starfleet. Admittedly I do realize now the distress call asked only for him.Just like Kirk in TWOK was no longer the fist-throwing explorer he was the first time he encountered Khan. Kirk in that film is at least 43 years younger than Picard is in this episode but the message is the same: we all grow older and often lose touch with what we used to be.
He was there as an advisor and a SME........we do that in the military now with people who aren't even prior service......It seems my point isn't clear. I get that Picard changed. What I don't get is why anyone in-universe would, knowing that, put him back out into Starfleet. Admittedly I do realize now the distress call asked only for him.
But Picard back in Starfleet just felt all wrong and backwards to me and still does.
I think he's been busy with other things.......he had a fairly large part in CSI: Vegas and several other things in post right now.So, what's the reason to write out Jamie McShane's character of Zhaban?
Is it to create this love-interest sub-plot between Picard & Laris?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.