he got enough of that lately
Yeah but that was years ago, I think it was even before 2009 when Star Trek was pretty much dead.
he got enough of that lately
i know, i meant to shut up for the time beingYeah but that was years ago, I think it was even before 2009 when Star Trek was pretty much dead.
it'd be controversial to call tos series #3 goodIs it controversial to say The Cloud Minders is not very good?
it'd be controversial to call tos series #3 good![]()
i didn't say that, did it? especially the tholian web is one of my alltime favourites but to me tos 3 is the worst season of all trek which means the one with the most drop-outs during a binging sessionThe Tholian Web... Requiem for Methuselah... The Savage Curtain... The Paradise Syndrome... they're not all to be avoided.
I don't understand though why there would be any need for some over-complicated "frame story" of people in the Star Trek future "sending back information and sometimes pictures/film" to the "Star Trek present for them to make shows out of".
Why not just see Star Trek as the fictional show it is, why is there any need for this additional layer?
I like The Empath.
There isn't one.
i still don't like it but i'll try againThat's not only controversial to some in our fanbase but I'll go one better. I adore it.
It has a truly beautiful soundtrack, Kathryn Hays turns in a wonderful physical performance as Gem and the Vians are two of the more interesting aliens in Season 3, both in motivations and makeup.
I’ve always liked the term Terrans.
I wish that was how we referred to ourselves.
![]()
it'd be controversial to call tos series #3 good![]()
I've never been attached to the name "Terran," but I do kinda wish it was common to refer to the Moon as Luna. My brain might be weird here, but if travel to and from the Moon becomes commonplace, "He's going to Luna" sounds better in that context than "He's going to the Moon." "Going to the Moon" sounds momentous; "going to Luna" sounds like a normal activity.
I agree. I live in New Jersey, and folks here refer to New York City as just "the city." Similarly, the Jersey Shore is simply "the shore."I disagree here, at least as far as the humans of Star Trek's Earth would use it. "The Moon" sounds exactly like the kind of local colloquialism for a nearby place.
I disagree here, at least as far as the humans of Star Trek's Earth would use it. "The Moon" sounds exactly like the kind of local colloquialism for a nearby place. Like for example people living along the shoreline referring to a single, close-by island simply as "the Island", even though it has a proper name.
So for the inhabitants of Earth I would see calling Luna "the Moon" in everyday conversation would seem very natural to me, and something visitors might find a quaint habit of the locals.
like:
Local: "Do you want to come along to the Moon?"
Visitor: "Which one?"
Local: "Buddy, there's only one moon we call 'the Moon' around here."
The Lunarians on the other hands might prefer to call it Luna, and in the wider Federation it would probably also be called Luna, or Earth's Moon.
Yes. Yes, I did.Of course, I'm also slightly biased because GoldenEye was the first Bond film I saw in the theater.
Cue anyone older than me saying, "Oh my God... "
I think the problem is that English (and, I'm sure, other languages) has no good word for this.The problem is, in my opinion, more that Star Trek doesn't really have a word that can be used to encompass all sapient lifeforms. Even calling humanoids "humanoids" is problematic in this context, since it assumes human as the basis/standard.
Marvel comics occasionally uses "Sapient/Sapients" as a noun to encompass all sapient life. I think that's a much better terminology.
Well, to be fair, 10-year-old Lord Garth wouldn't have been that interested in going to see License to Kill. So the next opening took six years.Yes. Yes, I did.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.