• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Like I stated "TATV..." is a bigger insult. It's less forgivable. But at least it's not "Shades of Grey" or "Code of Honor."
I like your “biggest insult” vs “worse episode” distinction. Part of why I greet TATV with a shrug is that I stopped watching ENT in early Season 3 after contracting a serious case Trek burnout compounded by law school. I didn’t have the emotional investment to be insulted and I like watching Jonathan Frakes on screen. (I never said it was good, just that I don’t hate it the way that other fans (who all probably far more invested in ENT) do
 
I like your “biggest insult” vs “worse episode” distinction. Part of why I greet TATV with a shrug is that I stopped watching ENT in early Season 3 after contracting a serious case Trek burnout compounded by law school. I didn’t have the emotional investment to be insulted and I like watching Jonathan Frakes on screen. (I never said it was good, just that I don’t hate it the way that other fans (who all probably far more invested in ENT) do
count me in there - i happened to like enterprise
 
Yeah, ENT got screwed. First by UPN and then by Berman and Braga's awful idea for a "Valentine" to the fans to wrap everything up in a nice bow.

It wasn't intentional but a slap in the face is still a slap in the face.
 
I agree that "PRECIOUS CARGO" is an objectively worse episode than "THESE ARE THE VOYAGES...". I would count "Shades Of Gray" and "Sub Rosa" as worse, too... though the former can be excused somewhat because of the budget and strike situation that season 2 faced. (Plus, the idea that your memories can be used to actually fight off a parasite is an interesting premise... just horribly executed.)

But TATV gets my vote as THE worst episode in the franchise because it focused on lead characters from a show that had already been off the air for over 10 YEARS!

At least the bad episodes of other series were about characters from their own show.

(I will concede that TATV might have been a better episode if it was made as anything other than a series finale.)
 
"TATV..." is definitely amongst my Worst Episodes of Trek Ever. And ranks up there in the numbers.
 
"Sub Rosa" is objective hot garbage whose only redeeming quality is the jokes and memes that came from it. It's not my worst Trek episode ever but if there's a Thunderdome throwdown for the Bottom 10 Episodes of Anything Star Trek "Sub Rosa" would suplex several of the others.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Trip died for no good reason. I know what defenders of the script will say. "He saved his friend the Captain so he could go on to make the Federation Charter Speech." He still died for no good reason. Anyone else on Enterprise could have sacrificed themselves to stop the alien intruders looking for Shran and his daughter and even with a crew this small compared to future starships it carried security officers. Trip was sacrificed because Berman and Braga couldn't think of anything better and felt it would grab the viewers' attention.

It did alright, just not in a good way.
 
I'm genuinely surprised anyone can look at Precious Cargo and think "This is signficantly worse than the six episodes that came before it". It's not my favourite story, but it's not what I'd pick as the nadir of season 2.
 
It's kind of amazing how badly TPTB misread their own fandom on this one.

I mean, they truly believed this was a "Valentine to the fans". They did not set out to make the worst finale in Star Trek history.

Certainly this stands as a strong data point (among many) that B&B were past the point of severe creative burnout by the end of ENT.
 
got a most likely very controversial opinion myself

using the word human instead of terran is kinda racist

reason: each and every species is named after their planet. only terrans are called humans and consider the term terran as derogatory. so what makes us 'deserve' a special name while we call everybody else by the place where they come from / evolved?

as i see it would make a lot more sense to enlarge the term human to include all sentient species (even the bad guys of the week) thusly using the scientific name of homo vulcani sapiens sapiens for vulcans and homo terrae sapiens sapiens for terrans (i'm not sure whether this would be supossed to be a genitivus or another adjective but you get my point)

Two counterpoints:

1 Using the term humans have always used to describe just themselves and nothing else as a catch-all for all intelligent life would be just as racist and kind of non-sensical since Humans are far younger/newer to the interstellar scene than most other major species.

2 Using the term Terran to refer specifically to homo sapiens and no other species is racist towards Dolphins and Humpback Whales. Humans (in Star Trek) aren't intended to be the only intelligent lifeform to have evolved on Terra.
 
A better way to have Trip die would be if he'd been saving the ship from a Romulan Attack during a decisive battle that ended The Romulan War. "These Are the Voyages" could have shown what led to the founding of the Federation. Riker and Troi could've been looking at highlights, basically showing us what Seasons 5-7 would've looked like.

If you need a story reason: Riker's a History Buff, he has a particular interest in the 22nd Century, and so one of the teachers aboard the Enterprise has Riker and Troi speak to their class, but the kids don't care, they're bored, they're a stand-in for the fans who didn't want a prequel, so Riker decides to take them to the Holodeck to see and then that makes the kids interested. By the time Riker and Troi finish showing all these kids the highlights, they want to know more.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top