• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Orville season 3 - first look

Parody is considered fair use under US copyright law, so if you want to blatantly rip off something without getting sued, you say it's a parody. If you don't want to do a parody and you don't want to get sued, you come up with your own ideas. That's part of the problem with The Orville. McFarlane had to play it as parody early on, no matter that he wanted to do more serious Star Trek-style storytelling. The problem is, I'm sure I'm not the only viewer who can't take Mercer seriously in a less parodic episode because the guy's a joke. His character wasn't built to carry the weight of a serious story.
 
Nope. If the Orville is a ripoff of Star Trek than you can argue that Babylon v, Star gate and many more series are.

Under that law they could actually use the Star Trek trademark and characters (see for example the SNL Star Trek sketches), but this is not what’s happening here.

Is for setting similar? Sure. Would it have issues in court because of that? No. There are plenty of shows that have settings similar to each other.
 
Nope. If the Orville is a ripoff of Star Trek than you can argue that Babylon v, Star gate and many more series are.

The Orville tries so hard to imitate Star Trek that it has Star Trek writers and cast members on the show, it borrows the look and feel of Star Trek, especially TNG, tells similarly structured stories, and has episode music recognizably in the Star Trek style, not as a one-off, but as standard practice. Nobody else has done anything that obviously indebted to Star Trek without being Star Trek.
 
Sure, but it’s still not a parody of Star Trek nor does include any copyrighted material.

On the contrary, they are developing their universe quite well and it doesn’t look like the one of Star Trek, if not for the obvious parallel union:federation, that still have some interesting differences and are pretty much the kind of direction one may optimistically see humanity take.

And with Brannon Braga producing the show one may argue he’s pretty much doing the same thing he always does.
 
Parody is considered fair use under US copyright law, so if you want to blatantly rip off something without getting sued, you say it's a parody. If you don't want to do a parody and you don't want to get sued, you come up with your own ideas. That's part of the problem with The Orville. McFarlane had to play it as parody early on, no matter that he wanted to do more serious Star Trek-style storytelling. The problem is, I'm sure I'm not the only viewer who can't take Mercer seriously in a less parodic episode because the guy's a joke. His character wasn't built to carry the weight of a serious story.
That's probably the hardest part for me regarding the Orville and why I didn't go back. They had a super comedy episode and then a super serious one and the gears stripped for me in trying to follow this character who is basically characterized as near incompetent who could only regain his mojo because of his manipulative ex and an admiral. That's not inspiring, and it is very jarring.
 
Season 1 tended to be uneven in tone, season 2 did much better IMO.
It tried, I'll give it that. It had a stand out episode and then a complete downer and that was pretty much it for me. The overall look and feel of the show so close to something that I could enjoy but it falls out of alignment quickly and I can't keep up.

I'll revisit it someday. But, as a show it isn't doing much to hook me.
 
It tried, I'll give it that. It had a stand out episode and then a complete downer and that was pretty much it for me. The overall look and feel of the show so close to something that I could enjoy but it falls out of alignment quickly and I can't keep up.

I'll revisit it someday. But, as a show it isn't doing much to hook me.
What was the stand out episode?
 
At least they're not flagrant swearing and acting like a bunch of fast food workers after getting out of Senior High. Check that, Orville's done that as much as DSC had as well, with that stupid smartphone episode being the most flagrant case of being an uninspired Trek ripoff (the hollow asteroid with colony being the other.) But, as for swearing with the belief they're somehow being more sophisticated, Orville has kept it remarkably mature and is a step above DSC in that regard, if nothing else.
Yes, they swear on DSC, but I don't remember the other behavior you're talking about, and swearing has been pretty tastefully done.
Hell, it's pretty hard to find non-kid shows that don't have swearing, and when it comes to Trek if they wanted taken seriously as prestige series, they were going to have be at least a bit more mature than the old shows were. Discovery is still very tame compared to a lot of the other streaming shows out, shit they can even say fuck on basic cable these days.
I think a single episode of Yellowstone or The Magicians last couple seasons have more fucks in them than all of DSC has.



That silliness aside, you are quite right. The "not real star trek" is not new. But people also noticed TNG got up to 3~6x million more viewers than the current shows. DSC started out with nearly 10 million, but by season 4 dropped to 1.4M. (Sources: EW and Variety)
TNG started with 15M, quickly dropped to 8M, then went back up... but by its 4th season was 12M. Season 5 peaked at 13M. Between the seasons the ratings were comparatively steady.
Not many shows these days get the kinds of numbers shows regularly did back in the '80s, people's attention is spread out a lot more now.
Plus, TNG wasn't behind a paywall. There's no way around that one. Partly because people aren't going to go spend $70/mo for Hulu+Live just to see the new Orville episodes. (Unless the $7 and $12 plans for their library content include newly made episodes, which seems unlikely - especially as you apparently can't make a TV show anymore where a single episode costs < $1M to make.)
I pay $6.99 a month for Hulu and I have access to all of their original series and movies, all the Live gets you is access to content from more cable channels and stuff like that.
 
I think it might have originally started off as a parody, but as the show went on, especially with season 2, the show became more of its own thing. It's done a lot to expand its own lore in a variety of ways, and I consider it more of a loving homage.
 
But even when it had elements of "parody" in the first season, there were still a number of episodes that were more 90s Trek than anything we'd seen in a long time.
 
Episode 2x01: Ja'loja
one of my least favorite episodes.

Yes, they swear on DSC, but I don't remember the other behavior you're talking about, and swearing has been pretty tastefully done.
Hell, it's pretty hard to find non-kid shows that don't have swearing, and when it comes to Trek if they wanted taken seriously as prestige series, they were going to have be at least a bit more mature than the old shows were.
never got how swearing should be “mature”...in fact the ones that swear a lot, in my experience, are teenagers trying to sound “mature”.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top