Especially these soundtrack selections:
Season 3 may be the weakest link for TOS is so many respects but when the budget got cut you can see how Fred Freiberger told them to still make the series as attractive as possible, including the musical orchestration. Heck, in Season 3 the uniform shirts were finally made of a better material than velour. They were rayon or nylon or something like that but you can clearly see how much better they looked and sat on the actor's torsos.
To be honest I was more interested in his internal conflict over saving Edith Keeler than their romance.
I do like the canon Ambassador's saucer, neck, and secondary hull – like a chunky, updated Constitution-class, with nice and strong curvilinear lines. However, I think that the "original concept" version of the Ambassador-class, as realised by Tobias Richter – what Star Trek Online calls the Narendra-class – is the single best saucer-secondary-nacelles-style starship design we've ever seen, anywhere. Never mind the Enterprise-C, I wish this had been the Enterprise-D.
How's that for a controversial Star Trek opinion![]()
I like the texture/appearance of the S1-2 uniform fabric, but the fit of the S3 uniforms.Season 3 may be the weakest link for TOS is so many respects but when the budget got cut you can see how Fred Freiberger told them to still make the series as attractive as possible, including the musical orchestration. Heck, in Season 3 the uniform shirts were finally made of a better material than velour. They were rayon or nylon or something like that but you can clearly see how much better they looked and sat on the actor's torsos.
I tend to agree, though I would say there are a few exceptions to the rule. But overall, Star Trek's history with romance is poor and I would prefer it flat out ignore it all together.Is there are no good romances of the week a controversial take?
Yes, like most people, I like The City on the Edge of Forever. But it wasn't the romance per se which made the episode, it was Kirk's internal conflict.
I tend to agree, though I would say there are a few exceptions to the rule. But overall, Star Trek's history with romance is poor and I would prefer it flat out ignore it all together.
That's a fair point and one that probably resonates far more with other audience members than myself. I usually don't require a lot of legwork to get me to care about a character but getting me to care about their romantic life? I barely care about that with people I know in real life. What is going to make me do so in fiction?I think part of the issue is honestly to have a romance that works onscreen the viewer must care about both the characters - but the legwork of getting us to care about the guest character is basically never done.
Season 3 may be the weakest link for TOS is so many respects but when the budget got cut you can see how Fred Freiberger told them to still make the series as attractive as possible, including the musical orchestration. Heck, in Season 3 the uniform shirts were finally made of a better material than velour. They were rayon or nylon or something like that but you can clearly see how much better they looked and sat on the actor's torsos.
The optical effects were much improved, too. Mike Minor’s contributions and the advancing state of the art added much to program. The Melkotian, all of “The Tholian Web”, as well as “The Lights of Zetar”, were a visual feast.I agree. There was also something more modern about the cinematography during S3 that I liked. Some of S2 looks very grainy and even herky-jerky at times. S3 has a slick look to it, even with the reduced budget they were dealing with.
Janeway/Chakotay would have been good if they had pulled the trigger on it early on. But the longer the show went the less it made sense.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.