We have fire extinguishers on bridges in the 23rd century and flamethrowers on them in the 32nd. Clearly something went wrong. 

I guess maybe they're just super-confident about flame spurts in the 32nd century. I... guess I could see it.We have fire extinguishers on bridges in the 23rd century and flamethrowers on them in the 32nd. Clearly something went wrong.![]()
Its certainly nowhere near that level. Ya it looks like a Rammstein gig but its only a small background thing where as the turbolift caverns change the whole physics of the ship.Flamethrower reason:
They’re trolling us. We accepted the turbolift pocket dimension too easily, so now they’ve got to up the ante.
![]()
Why would it be different? You're just changing the hormones and changing your genes wouldn't radically re-sculpt your body, it wouldn't really do what hormones don't already do. The human body (and likely any other humanoid species in Trek) is already pretty good at dealing with different hormones. Once the hormone balance shifts in a person, genes just express themselves based on that hormone. A trans person on hormones goes through the puberty of their gender. The only advances that would make sense would be some way to fully change the reproductive organs, you could do showing a pregnant trans female character.While I understand the reason to mention Grey's transition in terms of real life representation, considering gender confirmation surgery was available in the space of a few hours in the 24th century, it's hard for me to imagine the transition process being anything like what trans people experience now.
Of course, I can headcanon this as being because they were on a relatively low tech generation ship.
They have... Star Trek VI... The Undiscovered Country ring a bell?
Also we got a little scene in DS9 with Bashir
Anyone else find it really weird how blasé everyone is about it. I mean it raises a ton for practical and ethical questions and the captain is just like "oh that's cute"
And ffs, why does the bridge of a 23rd century starship, modified in the 31st century still emit fire from its walls? Looks like a 90ies Universal Studio live action attraction…
He could have at least left her on Discovery for the mission. Unless of course she has magic powers we don't know about yet
Picard's fate as a Synth is his only footnote in history?
Janeway in "Concerning Flight(VOY)" only remembered that James T. Kirk once claimed to have met Leonardo da Vinci, nothing else about his career.
My main problem was that the bridge was still belching fire randomly even when the ship wasn't shown as being hit by anyting; not to mention the fact that the resolution was high enough that you could tell there was just a port there that looked like it was designed to shoot a flame out.Fire shoots out because it's visual storytelling and they need to show the ship got hit and it's it bad. There would be no sense of danger if they just all leaned to side suddenly and kept saying how low the shields were. It's a tv show, not a physics demonstration.
It wasn't relevant to the conversation.
Do you recite the entire history of Alexander every time you mention him to someone?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.