Imagine being one of the power players on MB and thinking the Litverse shouldn’t be the site’s predominate focus.![]()
As I said, there should be no "predominant" focus. A reference source should be unbiased, giving fair and equal attention to everything.
imagine being misguided and thinking that a divergent continuity of several dozen novels that take place in an alternate reality from the rest of Star Trek should take the focus from hundreds of other comics, RPGs and video games that greatly outnumber them (taking 55 years of Star Trek history and cutting a cake slice out of 13-17years of it and saying "this" and then calling people names when they point out the illogic of that)
Now, that doesn't make sense either, because those other comics, games, etc. occupy many different, mutually contradictory continuities. So they don't "outnumber" anything. And it wouldn't matter if they did. It's nonsensical to argue over which of various imaginary stories are more "real" than each other. They're all just stories. Continuity is just a device that some stories use. It's not a measure of a story's worth, and it's certainly not a bludgeon to hit other fans over the head with.
I've been reading Trek tie-ins since the 1970s, and the one thing that's been clear to me over all that time is that continuity has always been the exception, not the norm. Even over the past 20 years of the novelverse, it's been just one of multiple tie-in continuities alongside the comics and games, and has never included every novel. Continuity in Trek tie-ins has always been optional. So it shouldn't be a priority to Memory Beta. Alpha is the "canon" site that worries about what's "right"; Beta's job is to catalog all the stuff that isn't canon, that's all equally apocryphal whether it's consistent with current canon or not (because any tie-in consistent with today's canon might well be contradicted by tomorrow's canon). It should try to acknowledge the reality of Trek tie-ins, which is the great freedom they've had over the decades to experiment and take different paths, and the ways in which they've evolved in response to changing canon. They've never been one uniform thing, never had one single "right" version, and a truthful reference guide should reflect that.