• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Introducing Fact Trek

Is this really worth discussing? What Roddenberry meant by “get” when idly asking asking about how to obtain some reference material?
 
Stills from the movie (or maybe they were photos taken separately; it's not always readily apparent) already existed in the form of lobby cards, but those probably didn't show all the parts of the ship interior that they would have wanted to look at. My gut feeling tells me that if they had the equipment capable of making stills on paper from a borrowed film print, then they would have gone ahead and done it anyway for their own internal use, even if there were legal technicalities that said they really weren't supposed to. Of course, that's pure speculation on my part about the "behind the scenes" goings-on of the show business industry, which hasn't necessarily always been known as a bastion of ethics and integrity.

Kor
 
Last edited:
Is this really worth discussing? What Roddenberry meant by “get” when idly asking asking about how to obtain some reference material?

I don't understand. You run a website that's all about meticulously detailed research into arcane bits of Trek trivia that most people wouldn't consider important enough to be worth discussing. I'm trying to do the same thing, as an exercise in curiosity. Is it "worth" discussing? Obviously that depends on the individual. I find it worthwhile to ask questions and wonder about things and try to solve puzzles. I thought you did too.
 
I don't understand. You run a website that's all about meticulously detailed research into arcane bits of Trek trivia that most people wouldn't consider important enough to be worth discussing. I'm trying to do the same thing, as an exercise in curiosity. Is it "worth" discussing? Obviously that depends on the individual. I find it worthwhile to ask questions and wonder about things and try to solve puzzles. I thought you did too.

Fact Trek is hardly just a "meticulously detailed research into the arcane bits of Trek trivia [website] that most people wouldn't consider important enough to be worth discussing."

It has a clear mission that goes beyond looking into the arcane, where it busts myths built up over decades of telephone. And it's not about speculation, but based on documentation and fact.

This discussion into an unclear statement made in one memo on a film print is pure speculation. There are no hard facts to look into. There's a clear difference.
 
insufficient-data-25296927.png
 
I bristle of the characterization “arcane bits of Trek trivia”. We’re trying to add to and correct the historical record around a bunch of stuff that is steeped in pop culture mythology, and to set the show in the historic context of media of the time as opposed to the tendency to portray it as a wholly unique exemplar. What Gene Roddenberry may have meant by the word “get” does not qualify.
 
A number of people did collect actual films, 32 mm or 16 mm film on reels, obtained legally or otherwise.. A number of otherwise lost movies now exist in full or in part only from copies preserved by such private collectors. For exmple, a number of copies of lost episodes of Doctor Who have been preserved only in private film collections.

I remember looking at a film catalog in my high school back in the 1960s listing various feature films which could be rented or bought, I don't know which. I think that I remember that the science fiction film The Damned or These are The Damned (1962) was one of them.

And I remember lookig at another film catalog in another location during the 1960s. I noted that among the films which could be rented or bought were some science ficiton films - I think I remember Battle of the Worlds (1961).

So if my memory is correct it would have been possible in the 1960s to rent or buy copies of some films, although I don't know whether The Forbidden Planet was one of them.
 
Last edited:
I have the 1961 Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea feature on 16mm reels so sure, it's possible. A local tv station probably tossed it and fruitful dumpster diving eventually got it to me.
 
A number of people did collect actual films, 32 mm or 16 mm film on reels, obtained legally or otherwise.. A number of otherwise lost movies now exist in full or in part only from copies preserved by such private collectors. For exmple, a number of copies of lost episodes of Doctor Who have been preserved only in private film collections.

I remember looking at a film catalog in my high school back in the 1960s listing various feature films which could be rented or bought, I don't know which. I think that I remember that the science fiction film The Damned or These are The Damned (1962) was one of them.

And I remember lookig at another film catalog in another location during the 1960s. I noted that among the films which could be rented or bought were some science ficiton films - I think I remember Battle of the Worlds (1961).

So if my memory is correct it would have been possible i the 1960s to rent or buy copies of some films, although I don't know whether The Forbidden Planet was one of them.

I think availability might have been different for those in the industry, versus the general public.

Kor
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top