Is this really worth discussing? What Roddenberry meant by “get” when idly asking asking about how to obtain some reference material?
I don't understand. You run a website that's all about meticulously detailed research into arcane bits of Trek trivia that most people wouldn't consider important enough to be worth discussing. I'm trying to do the same thing, as an exercise in curiosity. Is it "worth" discussing? Obviously that depends on the individual. I find it worthwhile to ask questions and wonder about things and try to solve puzzles. I thought you did too.
The underlined above is inferring something unsupported by the memo cited. Nothing there says they went to MGM, the memo says "we saw MGM’s 'FORBIDDEN PLANET'". It's more likely they got a print to screen at Desilu. Careful about jumping to conclusions; that's how Cash Markmans are born.![]()
I specifically put that there for Indysolo.
A number of people did collect actual films, 32 mm or 16 mm film on reels, obtained legally or otherwise.. A number of otherwise lost movies now exist in full or in part only from copies preserved by such private collectors. For exmple, a number of copies of lost episodes of Doctor Who have been preserved only in private film collections.
I remember looking at a film catalog in my high school back in the 1960s listing various feature films which could be rented or bought, I don't know which. I think that I remember that the science fiction film The Damned or These are The Damned (1962) was one of them.
And I remember lookig at another film catalog in another location during the 1960s. I noted that among the films which could be rented or bought were some science ficiton films - I think I remember Battle of the Worlds (1961).
So if my memory is correct it would have been possible i the 1960s to rent or buy copies of some films, although I don't know whether The Forbidden Planet was one of them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.