Funny Angles was the best standup comedy lounge of the 1980s.
That's acute observation.I always found the humor rather obtuse.
Funny Angles was the best standup comedy lounge of the 1980s.
That's acute observation.I always found the humor rather obtuse.
It's right there, in the second image that you quoted.
42, actually lmaoThis thread is now offset by 35 degrees.
Here are some more images, from TrekCore, at different resolutions.All I see are a bunch of little screens which have tiny little vague images on them, and a bolt of lightening. I don't seen any clear images of anything in the little screens show in the image in question.
All I see are a bunch of little screens which have tiny little vague images on them, and a bolt of lightening. I don't seen any clear images of anything in the little screens show in the image in question.
47. Must allow for it being a inflationary universe, after all.42, actually lmao
dJE
Try a different slant to look at it.
Why?
The Enterprise was rushed through refit to intercept V'ger. It's not at all unbelievable that a display interface that would be activated only in circumstances that quite possibly never occurred in the interim* and that in any case did not itself require metrical fidelity might get "left behind." It was actually the class ship representation, as one can tell by the registry number, and not specifically a graphic of the Enterprise herself [https://movies.trekcore.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=401&page=2]. In universe, it's possible that during the refit a place-holder schematic was inserted into the security subsystem for certain types of alerts, and it was never looked at again, because an officer had marked the schematic as adequately set during the launch prep. Metrical fidelity would be more necessary in the quarters plan in the second graphic, so we can conclude that the follow-up graphic is more likely supposed to be accurate (whatever its source IRL, which could well be FJ, I've not checked, doesn't matter that much).
Admiral Morrow said that command felt the Enterprise had had her day, and perhaps there was good reason that he and they believed that the best course of action was simply to retire her. There being computer code and corresponding data in need of an overhaul believably could have been one of those reasons.
* - And, yes, in case you're wondering, perhaps to the subsystem, this type of breach was classified differently than when the Ilia probe came aboard.
The post I was responding to said:If I recall correctly, the dialogue here is "It's running our records! Earth defenses. Starfleet strengths!"
Some say this diagram has to be ignored because it does not contain the current configuration of the ship. There is no reason it WOULD contain a current schematic, if it was running through "records", i.e. documents made in the past about whatever time they were made.
While I'm at it, has anybody actually analyzed the directions the crew get thrown about, to see if the way the crew reacts actually reflect a forward facing bridge?
...I mean, if the ship gets hit with a phaser blast and then everyone leans or goes flying directly to the right of the set, how do we know that the phaser hit the ship directly broadside? The way the crew leans and flies about might actually support the idea of an offset bridge, insomuch as very few obstacles would actually hit them 100% head on...
Scenes of combat are tricky to analyse because the ship is usually also doing maneuvres at the time.While I'm at it, has anybody actually analyzed the directions the crew get thrown about, to see if the way the crew reacts actually reflect a forward facing bridge?
...I mean, if the ship gets hit with a phaser blast and then everyone leans or goes flying directly to the right of the set, how do we know that the phaser hit the ship directly broadside? The way the crew leans and flies about might actually support the idea of an offset bridge, insomuch as very few obstacles would actually hit them 100% head on...
Yeah, and I won't deny that IMO that's solid evidence in the camp of "bridge faces forward."Scenes of combat are tricky to analyse because the ship is usually also doing maneuvres at the time.
However, a great and clear example is in Arena where the ship is brought to a rapid stop and all the crew are flung towards the viewscreen:
![]()
Or they are being yanked in the direction of the Metrons' star system by their 'tractor' beam.Yeah, and I won't deny that IMO that's solid evidence in the camp of "bridge faces forward."
However, team "bridge at an angle" can claim it too, by calling into question how inertial dampeners work or whether the ship was maneuvering, just to name two issues.
Which just happens to have a bearing of 36 degrees to port. Boom.Or they are being yanked in the direction of the Metrons' star system.![]()
However, team "bridge at an angle" can claim it too, by calling into question how inertial dampeners work or whether the ship was maneuvering, just to name two issues.
At this point in the episode the Gorn ship had stopped and the Enterprise was barelling towards her target at Warp 8 - then she was stopped dead in her tracks.Or they are being yanked in the direction of the Metrons' star system by their tractor beam.![]()
Just like there is usually no maneuvering mentioned when non-viewer-direction tosses are shown. And the E did not stopped instantaneously; Sulu counts down the velocities. So they were dragged to a stop in some direction...At this point in the episode the Gorn ship had stopped and the Enterprise was barelling towards her target at Warp 8 - then she was stopped dead in her tracks.
No yanking to the side was required or even mentioned![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.