• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

They left behind a transtator and communicator on Sigma Iotia II and didn't even go back for it. I mean, this is 100 years AFTER the Prime Directive went into effect.

Kirk was like the honey badger of the late 23rd century. He didn't give a damn.
 
They left behind a transtator and communicator on Sigma Iotia II and didn't even go back for it. I mean, this is 100 years AFTER the Prime Directive went into effect.

Kirk was like the honey badger of the late 23rd century. He didn't give a damn.
He's not supposed to feel or show emotions, damns included.
 
They left behind a transtator and communicator on Sigma Iotia II and didn't even go back for it. I mean, this is 100 years AFTER the Prime Directive went into effect.

Kirk was like the honey badger of the late 23rd century. He didn't give a damn.
He's also handing out guns*. Killing computer overlords. Changing the course of civilization. The man's a menace.

*Yeah, yeah the Klingons did it first.
 
And Starfleet clearly teaches he was a hero for his deeds so they like to have their cake and eat it, too. "The Prime Directive is sacrosanct, but did you SEE what an ultimate badass mofo Kirk was?" So, yeah, don't violate it but if you have to make it count.
 
Why didn't the Federation jump on the So'na sooner then events in Insurrection when they knew those guys were supplying the Dominion with all the Ketracel White?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top